[PATCH v3 10/13] mm/huge_memory: separate out the folio part of zap_huge_pmd()

Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle) posted 13 patches 2 weeks ago
[PATCH v3 10/13] mm/huge_memory: separate out the folio part of zap_huge_pmd()
Posted by Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle) 2 weeks ago
Place the part of the logic that manipulates counters and possibly updates
the accessed bit of the folio into its own function to make zap_huge_pmd()
more readable.

Also rename flush_needed to is_present as we only require a flush for
present entries.

Additionally add comments as to why we're doing what we're doing with
respect to softleaf entries.

This also lays the ground for further refactoring.

Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle) <ljs@kernel.org>
---
 mm/huge_memory.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index 673d0c4734ad..9ddf38d68406 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -2325,6 +2325,37 @@ static inline void zap_deposited_table(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd)
 	mm_dec_nr_ptes(mm);
 }
 
+static void zap_huge_pmd_folio(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+		pmd_t pmdval, struct folio *folio, bool is_present,
+		bool *has_deposit)
+{
+	const bool is_device_private = folio_is_device_private(folio);
+
+	/* Present and device private folios are rmappable. */
+	if (is_present || is_device_private)
+		folio_remove_rmap_pmd(folio, &folio->page, vma);
+
+	if (folio_test_anon(folio)) {
+		*has_deposit = true;
+		add_mm_counter(mm, MM_ANONPAGES, -HPAGE_PMD_NR);
+	} else {
+		add_mm_counter(mm, mm_counter_file(folio),
+			       -HPAGE_PMD_NR);
+
+		/*
+		 * Use flush_needed to indicate whether the PMD entry
+		 * is present, instead of checking pmd_present() again.
+		 */
+		if (is_present && pmd_young(pmdval) &&
+		    likely(vma_has_recency(vma)))
+			folio_mark_accessed(folio);
+	}
+
+	/* Device private folios are pinned. */
+	if (is_device_private)
+		folio_put(folio);
+}
+
 /**
  * zap_huge_pmd - Zap a huge THP which is of PMD size.
  * @tlb: The MMU gather TLB state associated with the operation.
@@ -2340,7 +2371,7 @@ bool zap_huge_pmd(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 	bool has_deposit = arch_needs_pgtable_deposit();
 	struct mm_struct *mm = tlb->mm;
 	struct folio *folio = NULL;
-	bool flush_needed = false;
+	bool is_present = false;
 	spinlock_t *ptl;
 	pmd_t orig_pmd;
 
@@ -2369,14 +2400,11 @@ bool zap_huge_pmd(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 
 	if (pmd_present(orig_pmd)) {
 		folio = pmd_folio(orig_pmd);
-
-		flush_needed = true;
-		folio_remove_rmap_pmd(folio, &folio->page, vma);
+		is_present = true;
 	} else if (pmd_is_valid_softleaf(orig_pmd)) {
 		const softleaf_t entry = softleaf_from_pmd(orig_pmd);
 
 		folio = softleaf_to_folio(entry);
-
 		if (!thp_migration_supported())
 			WARN_ONCE(1, "Non present huge pmd without pmd migration enabled!");
 	} else {
@@ -2384,33 +2412,14 @@ bool zap_huge_pmd(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	if (folio_test_anon(folio)) {
-		has_deposit = true;
-		add_mm_counter(mm, MM_ANONPAGES, -HPAGE_PMD_NR);
-	} else {
-		add_mm_counter(mm, mm_counter_file(folio),
-			       -HPAGE_PMD_NR);
-
-		/*
-		 * Use flush_needed to indicate whether the PMD entry
-		 * is present, instead of checking pmd_present() again.
-		 */
-		if (flush_needed && pmd_young(orig_pmd) &&
-		    likely(vma_has_recency(vma)))
-			folio_mark_accessed(folio);
-	}
-
-	if (folio_is_device_private(folio)) {
-		folio_remove_rmap_pmd(folio, &folio->page, vma);
-		folio_put(folio);
-	}
+	zap_huge_pmd_folio(mm, vma, orig_pmd, folio, is_present, &has_deposit);
 
 out:
 	if (has_deposit)
 		zap_deposited_table(mm, pmd);
 
 	spin_unlock(ptl);
-	if (flush_needed)
+	if (is_present)
 		tlb_remove_page_size(tlb, &folio->page, HPAGE_PMD_SIZE);
 	return true;
 }
-- 
2.53.0
Re: [PATCH v3 10/13] mm/huge_memory: separate out the folio part of zap_huge_pmd()
Posted by Baolin Wang 1 week, 6 days ago

On 3/21/26 2:07 AM, Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle) wrote:
> Place the part of the logic that manipulates counters and possibly updates
> the accessed bit of the folio into its own function to make zap_huge_pmd()
> more readable.
> 
> Also rename flush_needed to is_present as we only require a flush for
> present entries.
> 
> Additionally add comments as to why we're doing what we're doing with
> respect to softleaf entries.
> 
> This also lays the ground for further refactoring.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle) <ljs@kernel.org>
> ---
>   mm/huge_memory.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>   1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> index 673d0c4734ad..9ddf38d68406 100644
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -2325,6 +2325,37 @@ static inline void zap_deposited_table(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd)
>   	mm_dec_nr_ptes(mm);
>   }
>   
> +static void zap_huge_pmd_folio(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> +		pmd_t pmdval, struct folio *folio, bool is_present,
> +		bool *has_deposit)
> +{
> +	const bool is_device_private = folio_is_device_private(folio);
> +
> +	/* Present and device private folios are rmappable. */
> +	if (is_present || is_device_private)
> +		folio_remove_rmap_pmd(folio, &folio->page, vma);
> +
> +	if (folio_test_anon(folio)) {
> +		*has_deposit = true;
> +		add_mm_counter(mm, MM_ANONPAGES, -HPAGE_PMD_NR);
> +	} else {
> +		add_mm_counter(mm, mm_counter_file(folio),
> +			       -HPAGE_PMD_NR);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Use flush_needed to indicate whether the PMD entry
> +		 * is present, instead of checking pmd_present() again.
> +		 */
> +		if (is_present && pmd_young(pmdval) &&
> +		    likely(vma_has_recency(vma)))
> +			folio_mark_accessed(folio);

Nit: these comments were added by me to explain why 'flush_needed' was 
used:). Since it has been renamed to the more readable 'is_present', 
these comments are now redundant and can be removed.

With that,
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Re: [PATCH v3 10/13] mm/huge_memory: separate out the folio part of zap_huge_pmd()
Posted by Suren Baghdasaryan 6 days, 8 hours ago
On Fri, Mar 20, 2026 at 10:59 PM Baolin Wang
<baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 3/21/26 2:07 AM, Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle) wrote:
> > Place the part of the logic that manipulates counters and possibly updates
> > the accessed bit of the folio into its own function to make zap_huge_pmd()
> > more readable.
> >
> > Also rename flush_needed to is_present as we only require a flush for
> > present entries.
> >
> > Additionally add comments as to why we're doing what we're doing with
> > respect to softleaf entries.
> >
> > This also lays the ground for further refactoring.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle) <ljs@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >   mm/huge_memory.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> >   1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> > index 673d0c4734ad..9ddf38d68406 100644
> > --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> > +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> > @@ -2325,6 +2325,37 @@ static inline void zap_deposited_table(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd)
> >       mm_dec_nr_ptes(mm);
> >   }
> >
> > +static void zap_huge_pmd_folio(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > +             pmd_t pmdval, struct folio *folio, bool is_present,
> > +             bool *has_deposit)
> > +{
> > +     const bool is_device_private = folio_is_device_private(folio);
> > +
> > +     /* Present and device private folios are rmappable. */
> > +     if (is_present || is_device_private)
> > +             folio_remove_rmap_pmd(folio, &folio->page, vma);
> > +
> > +     if (folio_test_anon(folio)) {
> > +             *has_deposit = true;
> > +             add_mm_counter(mm, MM_ANONPAGES, -HPAGE_PMD_NR);
> > +     } else {
> > +             add_mm_counter(mm, mm_counter_file(folio),
> > +                            -HPAGE_PMD_NR);
> > +
> > +             /*
> > +              * Use flush_needed to indicate whether the PMD entry
> > +              * is present, instead of checking pmd_present() again.
> > +              */
> > +             if (is_present && pmd_young(pmdval) &&
> > +                 likely(vma_has_recency(vma)))
> > +                     folio_mark_accessed(folio);
>
> Nit: these comments were added by me to explain why 'flush_needed' was
> used:). Since it has been renamed to the more readable 'is_present',
> these comments are now redundant and can be removed.
>
> With that,
> Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>

Reviewed-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Re: [PATCH v3 10/13] mm/huge_memory: separate out the folio part of zap_huge_pmd()
Posted by Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle) 1 week, 4 days ago
On Sat, Mar 21, 2026 at 01:59:34PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 3/21/26 2:07 AM, Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle) wrote:
> > Place the part of the logic that manipulates counters and possibly updates
> > the accessed bit of the folio into its own function to make zap_huge_pmd()
> > more readable.
> >
> > Also rename flush_needed to is_present as we only require a flush for
> > present entries.
> >
> > Additionally add comments as to why we're doing what we're doing with
> > respect to softleaf entries.
> >
> > This also lays the ground for further refactoring.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle) <ljs@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >   mm/huge_memory.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> >   1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> > index 673d0c4734ad..9ddf38d68406 100644
> > --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> > +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> > @@ -2325,6 +2325,37 @@ static inline void zap_deposited_table(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd)
> >   	mm_dec_nr_ptes(mm);
> >   }
> > +static void zap_huge_pmd_folio(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > +		pmd_t pmdval, struct folio *folio, bool is_present,
> > +		bool *has_deposit)
> > +{
> > +	const bool is_device_private = folio_is_device_private(folio);
> > +
> > +	/* Present and device private folios are rmappable. */
> > +	if (is_present || is_device_private)
> > +		folio_remove_rmap_pmd(folio, &folio->page, vma);
> > +
> > +	if (folio_test_anon(folio)) {
> > +		*has_deposit = true;
> > +		add_mm_counter(mm, MM_ANONPAGES, -HPAGE_PMD_NR);
> > +	} else {
> > +		add_mm_counter(mm, mm_counter_file(folio),
> > +			       -HPAGE_PMD_NR);
> > +
> > +		/*
> > +		 * Use flush_needed to indicate whether the PMD entry
> > +		 * is present, instead of checking pmd_present() again.
> > +		 */
> > +		if (is_present && pmd_young(pmdval) &&
> > +		    likely(vma_has_recency(vma)))
> > +			folio_mark_accessed(folio);
>
> Nit: these comments were added by me to explain why 'flush_needed' was
> used:). Since it has been renamed to the more readable 'is_present', these
> comments are now redundant and can be removed.

Ack, I think it's _probably_ ok to leave that as a later commit removes it
anyway, if that works for you?

>
> With that,
> Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>

Thanks!

Cheers, Lorenzo
Re: [PATCH v3 10/13] mm/huge_memory: separate out the folio part of zap_huge_pmd()
Posted by Baolin Wang 1 week, 3 days ago

On 3/23/26 6:42 PM, Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle) wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2026 at 01:59:34PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 3/21/26 2:07 AM, Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle) wrote:
>>> Place the part of the logic that manipulates counters and possibly updates
>>> the accessed bit of the folio into its own function to make zap_huge_pmd()
>>> more readable.
>>>
>>> Also rename flush_needed to is_present as we only require a flush for
>>> present entries.
>>>
>>> Additionally add comments as to why we're doing what we're doing with
>>> respect to softleaf entries.
>>>
>>> This also lays the ground for further refactoring.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle) <ljs@kernel.org>
>>> ---
>>>    mm/huge_memory.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>>>    1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
>>> index 673d0c4734ad..9ddf38d68406 100644
>>> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
>>> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
>>> @@ -2325,6 +2325,37 @@ static inline void zap_deposited_table(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd)
>>>    	mm_dec_nr_ptes(mm);
>>>    }
>>> +static void zap_huge_pmd_folio(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>> +		pmd_t pmdval, struct folio *folio, bool is_present,
>>> +		bool *has_deposit)
>>> +{
>>> +	const bool is_device_private = folio_is_device_private(folio);
>>> +
>>> +	/* Present and device private folios are rmappable. */
>>> +	if (is_present || is_device_private)
>>> +		folio_remove_rmap_pmd(folio, &folio->page, vma);
>>> +
>>> +	if (folio_test_anon(folio)) {
>>> +		*has_deposit = true;
>>> +		add_mm_counter(mm, MM_ANONPAGES, -HPAGE_PMD_NR);
>>> +	} else {
>>> +		add_mm_counter(mm, mm_counter_file(folio),
>>> +			       -HPAGE_PMD_NR);
>>> +
>>> +		/*
>>> +		 * Use flush_needed to indicate whether the PMD entry
>>> +		 * is present, instead of checking pmd_present() again.
>>> +		 */
>>> +		if (is_present && pmd_young(pmdval) &&
>>> +		    likely(vma_has_recency(vma)))
>>> +			folio_mark_accessed(folio);
>>
>> Nit: these comments were added by me to explain why 'flush_needed' was
>> used:). Since it has been renamed to the more readable 'is_present', these
>> comments are now redundant and can be removed.
> 
> Ack, I think it's _probably_ ok to leave that as a later commit removes it
> anyway, if that works for you?

Ah, I saw you removed them in the following patch. Looks fine to me. Thanks.