Use the of_machine_get_match() helper to avoid accessing of_root
directly, which is planned to become private.

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
---
This is an alternative solution to "[PATCH v2 8/9] soc: renesas: don't
access of_root directly"
https://lore.kernel.org/20260223-soc-of-root-v2-8-b45da45903c8@oss.qualcomm.com
---
 drivers/soc/renesas/renesas-soc.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/renesas/renesas-soc.c b/drivers/soc/renesas/renesas-soc.c
index f6c41892fbe549e8..bcba01acf283003d 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/renesas/renesas-soc.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/renesas/renesas-soc.c
@@ -488,7 +488,7 @@ static int __init renesas_soc_init(void)
 	const char *soc_id;
 	int ret;
 
-	match = of_match_node(renesas_socs, of_root);
+	match = of_machine_get_match(renesas_socs);
 	if (!match)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
-- 
2.43.0

On Mon, Mar 02, 2026 at 05:29:11PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Use the of_machine_get_match() helper to avoid accessing of_root
> directly, which is planned to become private.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> ---
> This is an alternative solution to "[PATCH v2 8/9] soc: renesas: don't
> access of_root directly"
> https://lore.kernel.org/20260223-soc-of-root-v2-8-b45da45903c8@oss.qualcomm.com

Greg applied this, so you'll have to respin on top of that. Next cycle I 
guess. Unless you get him to revert it.

I'm applying the rest of the series.

Rob

Hi Rob,

On Fri, 13 Mar 2026 at 22:59, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 02, 2026 at 05:29:11PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Use the of_machine_get_match() helper to avoid accessing of_root
> > directly, which is planned to become private.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> > ---
> > This is an alternative solution to "[PATCH v2 8/9] soc: renesas: don't
> > access of_root directly"
> > https://lore.kernel.org/20260223-soc-of-root-v2-8-b45da45903c8@oss.qualcomm.com
>
> Greg applied this, so you'll have to respin on top of that. Next cycle I
> guess. Unless you get him to revert it.

That was my impression, too, but apparently he skipped that patch.
So you can still apply this patch, too.

> I'm applying the rest of the series.

Thanks!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds