On Sat Feb 28, 2026 at 4:26 PM EST, Emil Tsalapatis wrote:
> On Sat Feb 28, 2026 at 2:11 AM EST, Hui Zhu wrote:
>> From: Hui Zhu <zhuhui@kylinos.cn>
>>
>> While back-porting "mm: bpf kfuncs to access memcg data", I
>> encountered issues with test_cgroup_iter_memcg, specifically
>> in test_kmem.
>>
>> These patches are my fixes for the problems I encountered.
>>
>
> Nit: Could you be a bit more descriptive about the series' contents?
> Cover letters normally focus on what what the patch does - for example
> the issues being found during backporting is not pertinent to the patchset
> itself, because the issues are still present on bpf-next.
>
Also, responded on v3 instead of v4 sorry about that. Comments and
tags still apply since the only delta is in the commit message.
>> Changelog:
>> v3:
>> According to the comments of JP Kobryn, remove kmem subtest from
>> cgroup_iter_memcg and fix assertion string in test_pgfault.
>> v2:
>> According to the comments of JP Kobryn, added bpf_core_enum_value()
>> usage in the BPF program to handle cross-kernel enum value differences
>> at load-time instead of compile-time.
>> Dropped the mm/memcontrol.c patch.
>> Modified test_kmem handling: instead of skipping when nokmem is set,
>> verify that kmem value is zero as expected.
>> According to the comments of bot, fixed assertion message: changed
>> "bpf_mem_cgroup_page_state" to "bpf_mem_cgroup_vm_events" for PGFAULT
>> check.
>>
>> Hui Zhu (3):
>> selftests/bpf: Remove kmem subtest from cgroup_iter_memcg
>> bpf: Use bpf_core_enum_value for stats in cgroup_iter_memcg
>> selftests/bpf: Check bpf_mem_cgroup_page_state return value
>>
>> .../testing/selftests/bpf/cgroup_iter_memcg.h | 2 -
>> .../bpf/prog_tests/cgroup_iter_memcg.c | 38 +++++--------------
>> .../selftests/bpf/progs/cgroup_iter_memcg.c | 18 ++++++---
>> 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)