[PATCH v2 03/28] mm: rename unlock_page_lruvec_irq and its variants

Qi Zheng posted 28 patches 2 days, 8 hours ago
[PATCH v2 03/28] mm: rename unlock_page_lruvec_irq and its variants
Posted by Qi Zheng 2 days, 8 hours ago
From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>

It is inappropriate to use folio_lruvec_lock() variants in conjunction
with unlock_page_lruvec() variants, as this involves the inconsistent
operation of locking a folio while unlocking a page. To rectify this, the
functions unlock_page_lruvec{_irq, _irqrestore} are renamed to
lruvec_unlock{_irq,_irqrestore}.

Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
---
 include/linux/memcontrol.h | 10 +++++-----
 mm/compaction.c            | 14 +++++++-------
 mm/huge_memory.c           |  2 +-
 mm/mlock.c                 |  2 +-
 mm/swap.c                  | 12 ++++++------
 mm/vmscan.c                |  4 ++--
 6 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index 6a48398a1f4e7..288dd6337f80f 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -1465,17 +1465,17 @@ static inline struct lruvec *parent_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec)
 	return mem_cgroup_lruvec(memcg, lruvec_pgdat(lruvec));
 }
 
-static inline void unlock_page_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec)
+static inline void lruvec_unlock(struct lruvec *lruvec)
 {
 	spin_unlock(&lruvec->lru_lock);
 }
 
-static inline void unlock_page_lruvec_irq(struct lruvec *lruvec)
+static inline void lruvec_unlock_irq(struct lruvec *lruvec)
 {
 	spin_unlock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
 }
 
-static inline void unlock_page_lruvec_irqrestore(struct lruvec *lruvec,
+static inline void lruvec_unlock_irqrestore(struct lruvec *lruvec,
 		unsigned long flags)
 {
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lruvec->lru_lock, flags);
@@ -1497,7 +1497,7 @@ static inline struct lruvec *folio_lruvec_relock_irq(struct folio *folio,
 		if (folio_matches_lruvec(folio, locked_lruvec))
 			return locked_lruvec;
 
-		unlock_page_lruvec_irq(locked_lruvec);
+		lruvec_unlock_irq(locked_lruvec);
 	}
 
 	return folio_lruvec_lock_irq(folio);
@@ -1511,7 +1511,7 @@ static inline void folio_lruvec_relock_irqsave(struct folio *folio,
 		if (folio_matches_lruvec(folio, *lruvecp))
 			return;
 
-		unlock_page_lruvec_irqrestore(*lruvecp, *flags);
+		lruvec_unlock_irqrestore(*lruvecp, *flags);
 	}
 
 	*lruvecp = folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave(folio, flags);
diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
index 1e8f8eca318c6..c3e338aaa0ffb 100644
--- a/mm/compaction.c
+++ b/mm/compaction.c
@@ -913,7 +913,7 @@ isolate_migratepages_block(struct compact_control *cc, unsigned long low_pfn,
 		 */
 		if (!(low_pfn % COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX)) {
 			if (locked) {
-				unlock_page_lruvec_irqrestore(locked, flags);
+				lruvec_unlock_irqrestore(locked, flags);
 				locked = NULL;
 			}
 
@@ -964,7 +964,7 @@ isolate_migratepages_block(struct compact_control *cc, unsigned long low_pfn,
 			}
 			/* for alloc_contig case */
 			if (locked) {
-				unlock_page_lruvec_irqrestore(locked, flags);
+				lruvec_unlock_irqrestore(locked, flags);
 				locked = NULL;
 			}
 
@@ -1053,7 +1053,7 @@ isolate_migratepages_block(struct compact_control *cc, unsigned long low_pfn,
 			if (unlikely(page_has_movable_ops(page)) &&
 			    !PageMovableOpsIsolated(page)) {
 				if (locked) {
-					unlock_page_lruvec_irqrestore(locked, flags);
+					lruvec_unlock_irqrestore(locked, flags);
 					locked = NULL;
 				}
 
@@ -1158,7 +1158,7 @@ isolate_migratepages_block(struct compact_control *cc, unsigned long low_pfn,
 		/* If we already hold the lock, we can skip some rechecking */
 		if (lruvec != locked) {
 			if (locked)
-				unlock_page_lruvec_irqrestore(locked, flags);
+				lruvec_unlock_irqrestore(locked, flags);
 
 			compact_lock_irqsave(&lruvec->lru_lock, &flags, cc);
 			locked = lruvec;
@@ -1226,7 +1226,7 @@ isolate_migratepages_block(struct compact_control *cc, unsigned long low_pfn,
 isolate_fail_put:
 		/* Avoid potential deadlock in freeing page under lru_lock */
 		if (locked) {
-			unlock_page_lruvec_irqrestore(locked, flags);
+			lruvec_unlock_irqrestore(locked, flags);
 			locked = NULL;
 		}
 		folio_put(folio);
@@ -1242,7 +1242,7 @@ isolate_migratepages_block(struct compact_control *cc, unsigned long low_pfn,
 		 */
 		if (nr_isolated) {
 			if (locked) {
-				unlock_page_lruvec_irqrestore(locked, flags);
+				lruvec_unlock_irqrestore(locked, flags);
 				locked = NULL;
 			}
 			putback_movable_pages(&cc->migratepages);
@@ -1274,7 +1274,7 @@ isolate_migratepages_block(struct compact_control *cc, unsigned long low_pfn,
 
 isolate_abort:
 	if (locked)
-		unlock_page_lruvec_irqrestore(locked, flags);
+		lruvec_unlock_irqrestore(locked, flags);
 	if (folio) {
 		folio_set_lru(folio);
 		folio_put(folio);
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index 40cf59301c21a..12b46215b30c1 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -3899,7 +3899,7 @@ static int __folio_freeze_and_split_unmapped(struct folio *folio, unsigned int n
 		folio_ref_unfreeze(folio, folio_cache_ref_count(folio) + 1);
 
 		if (do_lru)
-			unlock_page_lruvec(lruvec);
+			lruvec_unlock(lruvec);
 
 		if (ci)
 			swap_cluster_unlock(ci);
diff --git a/mm/mlock.c b/mm/mlock.c
index 2f699c3497a57..66740e16679c3 100644
--- a/mm/mlock.c
+++ b/mm/mlock.c
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ static void mlock_folio_batch(struct folio_batch *fbatch)
 	}
 
 	if (lruvec)
-		unlock_page_lruvec_irq(lruvec);
+		lruvec_unlock_irq(lruvec);
 	folios_put(fbatch);
 }
 
diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c
index 2260dcd2775e7..ec0c654e128dc 100644
--- a/mm/swap.c
+++ b/mm/swap.c
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static void page_cache_release(struct folio *folio)
 
 	__page_cache_release(folio, &lruvec, &flags);
 	if (lruvec)
-		unlock_page_lruvec_irqrestore(lruvec, flags);
+		lruvec_unlock_irqrestore(lruvec, flags);
 }
 
 void __folio_put(struct folio *folio)
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ static void folio_batch_move_lru(struct folio_batch *fbatch, move_fn_t move_fn)
 	}
 
 	if (lruvec)
-		unlock_page_lruvec_irqrestore(lruvec, flags);
+		lruvec_unlock_irqrestore(lruvec, flags);
 	folios_put(fbatch);
 }
 
@@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ void folio_activate(struct folio *folio)
 
 	lruvec = folio_lruvec_lock_irq(folio);
 	lru_activate(lruvec, folio);
-	unlock_page_lruvec_irq(lruvec);
+	lruvec_unlock_irq(lruvec);
 	folio_set_lru(folio);
 }
 #endif
@@ -963,7 +963,7 @@ void folios_put_refs(struct folio_batch *folios, unsigned int *refs)
 
 		if (folio_is_zone_device(folio)) {
 			if (lruvec) {
-				unlock_page_lruvec_irqrestore(lruvec, flags);
+				lruvec_unlock_irqrestore(lruvec, flags);
 				lruvec = NULL;
 			}
 			if (folio_ref_sub_and_test(folio, nr_refs))
@@ -977,7 +977,7 @@ void folios_put_refs(struct folio_batch *folios, unsigned int *refs)
 		/* hugetlb has its own memcg */
 		if (folio_test_hugetlb(folio)) {
 			if (lruvec) {
-				unlock_page_lruvec_irqrestore(lruvec, flags);
+				lruvec_unlock_irqrestore(lruvec, flags);
 				lruvec = NULL;
 			}
 			free_huge_folio(folio);
@@ -991,7 +991,7 @@ void folios_put_refs(struct folio_batch *folios, unsigned int *refs)
 		j++;
 	}
 	if (lruvec)
-		unlock_page_lruvec_irqrestore(lruvec, flags);
+		lruvec_unlock_irqrestore(lruvec, flags);
 	if (!j) {
 		folio_batch_reinit(folios);
 		return;
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 670fe9fae5baa..28d9b3af47130 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1829,7 +1829,7 @@ bool folio_isolate_lru(struct folio *folio)
 		folio_get(folio);
 		lruvec = folio_lruvec_lock_irq(folio);
 		lruvec_del_folio(lruvec, folio);
-		unlock_page_lruvec_irq(lruvec);
+		lruvec_unlock_irq(lruvec);
 		ret = true;
 	}
 
@@ -7855,7 +7855,7 @@ void check_move_unevictable_folios(struct folio_batch *fbatch)
 	if (lruvec) {
 		__count_vm_events(UNEVICTABLE_PGRESCUED, pgrescued);
 		__count_vm_events(UNEVICTABLE_PGSCANNED, pgscanned);
-		unlock_page_lruvec_irq(lruvec);
+		lruvec_unlock_irq(lruvec);
 	} else if (pgscanned) {
 		count_vm_events(UNEVICTABLE_PGSCANNED, pgscanned);
 	}
-- 
2.20.1
Re: [PATCH v2 03/28] mm: rename unlock_page_lruvec_irq and its variants
Posted by Shakeel Butt 16 hours ago
On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 03:27:27PM +0800, Qi Zheng wrote:
> From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
> 
> It is inappropriate to use folio_lruvec_lock() variants in conjunction
> with unlock_page_lruvec() variants, as this involves the inconsistent
> operation of locking a folio while unlocking a page. To rectify this, the
> functions unlock_page_lruvec{_irq, _irqrestore} are renamed to
> lruvec_unlock{_irq,_irqrestore}.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
> Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
> Reviewed-by: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>

Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Re: [PATCH v2 03/28] mm: rename unlock_page_lruvec_irq and its variants
Posted by David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) 1 day, 7 hours ago
On 12/17/25 08:27, Qi Zheng wrote:
> From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
> 
> It is inappropriate to use folio_lruvec_lock() variants in conjunction
> with unlock_page_lruvec() variants, as this involves the inconsistent
> operation of locking a folio while unlocking a page. To rectify this, the
> functions unlock_page_lruvec{_irq, _irqrestore} are renamed to
> lruvec_unlock{_irq,_irqrestore}.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
> Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
> Reviewed-by: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
> ---

Nice cleanup

Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) <david@kernel.org>

-- 
Cheers

David