[RFC 06/10] mm: debug_vm_pgtable: use pgtable_has_pmd_leaves()

Luiz Capitulino posted 10 patches 1 month, 1 week ago
There is a newer version of this series
[RFC 06/10] mm: debug_vm_pgtable: use pgtable_has_pmd_leaves()
Posted by Luiz Capitulino 1 month, 1 week ago
debug_vm_pgtable calls has_transparent_hugepage() in multiple places to
check if PMD-sized pages are supported, use pgtable_has_pmd_leaves()
instead.

Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino <luizcap@redhat.com>
---
 mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
index 830107b6dd08..241b36c78ac9 100644
--- a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
+++ b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ static void __init pmd_basic_tests(struct pgtable_debug_args *args, int idx)
 	unsigned long val = idx, *ptr = &val;
 	pmd_t pmd;
 
-	if (!has_transparent_hugepage())
+	if (!pgtable_has_pmd_leaves())
 		return;
 
 	pr_debug("Validating PMD basic (%pGv)\n", ptr);
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static void __init pmd_advanced_tests(struct pgtable_debug_args *args)
 	pmd_t pmd;
 	unsigned long vaddr = args->vaddr;
 
-	if (!has_transparent_hugepage())
+	if (!pgtable_has_pmd_leaves())
 		return;
 
 	page = (args->pmd_pfn != ULONG_MAX) ? pfn_to_page(args->pmd_pfn) : NULL;
@@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ static void __init pmd_leaf_tests(struct pgtable_debug_args *args)
 {
 	pmd_t pmd;
 
-	if (!has_transparent_hugepage())
+	if (!pgtable_has_pmd_leaves())
 		return;
 
 	pr_debug("Validating PMD leaf\n");
@@ -674,7 +674,7 @@ static void __init pmd_protnone_tests(struct pgtable_debug_args *args)
 	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING))
 		return;
 
-	if (!has_transparent_hugepage())
+	if (!pgtable_has_pmd_leaves())
 		return;
 
 	pr_debug("Validating PMD protnone\n");
@@ -721,7 +721,7 @@ static void __init pmd_soft_dirty_tests(struct pgtable_debug_args *args)
 	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MEM_SOFT_DIRTY))
 		return;
 
-	if (!has_transparent_hugepage())
+	if (!pgtable_has_pmd_leaves())
 		return;
 
 	pr_debug("Validating PMD soft dirty\n");
@@ -738,7 +738,7 @@ static void __init pmd_swap_soft_dirty_tests(struct pgtable_debug_args *args)
 		!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_ENABLE_THP_MIGRATION))
 		return;
 
-	if (!has_transparent_hugepage())
+	if (!pgtable_has_pmd_leaves())
 		return;
 
 	pr_debug("Validating PMD swap soft dirty\n");
@@ -801,7 +801,7 @@ static void __init pmd_swap_tests(struct pgtable_debug_args *args)
 	swp_entry_t arch_entry;
 	pmd_t pmd1, pmd2;
 
-	if (!has_transparent_hugepage())
+	if (!pgtable_has_pmd_leaves())
 		return;
 
 	pr_debug("Validating PMD swap\n");
@@ -881,7 +881,7 @@ static void __init pmd_thp_tests(struct pgtable_debug_args *args)
 {
 	pmd_t pmd;
 
-	if (!has_transparent_hugepage())
+	if (!pgtable_has_pmd_leaves())
 		return;
 
 	pr_debug("Validating PMD based THP\n");
@@ -968,7 +968,7 @@ static void __init destroy_args(struct pgtable_debug_args *args)
 	}
 
 	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE) &&
-	    has_transparent_hugepage() &&
+	    pgtable_has_pmd_leaves() &&
 	    args->pmd_pfn != ULONG_MAX) {
 		if (args->is_contiguous_page) {
 			free_contig_range(args->pmd_pfn, (1 << HPAGE_PMD_ORDER));
@@ -1226,7 +1226,7 @@ static int __init init_args(struct pgtable_debug_args *args)
 	}
 
 	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE) &&
-	    has_transparent_hugepage()) {
+	    pgtable_has_pmd_leaves()) {
 		page = debug_vm_pgtable_alloc_huge_page(args, HPAGE_PMD_ORDER);
 		if (page) {
 			args->pmd_pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
-- 
2.51.1
Re: [RFC 06/10] mm: debug_vm_pgtable: use pgtable_has_pmd_leaves()
Posted by David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) 1 month ago
On 06.11.25 22:28, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> debug_vm_pgtable calls has_transparent_hugepage() in multiple places to
> check if PMD-sized pages are supported, use pgtable_has_pmd_leaves()

Is that code even dealing with pages? Likely we really only want to 
check whether PMD leaves are supported, independent of any pages.

> instead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino <luizcap@redhat.com>
> ---
>   mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
> index 830107b6dd08..241b36c78ac9 100644
> --- a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
> +++ b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
> @@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ static void __init pmd_basic_tests(struct pgtable_debug_args *args, int idx)
>   	unsigned long val = idx, *ptr = &val;
>   	pmd_t pmd;
>   
> -	if (!has_transparent_hugepage())
> +	if (!pgtable_has_pmd_leaves())
>   		return;


All of these are currently protected by CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE, right?

-- 
Cheers

David
Re: [RFC 06/10] mm: debug_vm_pgtable: use pgtable_has_pmd_leaves()
Posted by David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) 2 weeks, 1 day ago
On 11/17/25 18:40, David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) wrote:
> On 06.11.25 22:28, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>> debug_vm_pgtable calls has_transparent_hugepage() in multiple places to
>> check if PMD-sized pages are supported, use pgtable_has_pmd_leaves()
> 
> Is that code even dealing with pages? Likely we really only want to
> check whether PMD leaves are supported, independent of any pages.

I recall that some arch protect certain pmd_* helpers under 
CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE.

But it's certainly something to explore, to see if we can just get rid 
of that without causing compile-time or runtime issues.

> 
>> instead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino <luizcap@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>    mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
>>    1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
>> index 830107b6dd08..241b36c78ac9 100644
>> --- a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
>> +++ b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
>> @@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ static void __init pmd_basic_tests(struct pgtable_debug_args *args, int idx)
>>    	unsigned long val = idx, *ptr = &val;
>>    	pmd_t pmd;
>>    
>> -	if (!has_transparent_hugepage())
>> +	if (!pgtable_has_pmd_leaves())
>>    		return;
> 
> 
> All of these are currently protected by CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE, right?

IIUC, yes.


-- 
Cheers

David