From: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>

In the near future, a folio will no longer pin its corresponding memory
cgroup. To ensure safety, it will only be appropriate to hold the rcu read
lock or acquire a reference to the memory cgroup returned by
folio_memcg(), thereby preventing it from being released.

In the current patch, the rcu read lock is employed to safeguard against
the release of the memory cgroup in folio_split_queue_lock{_irqsave}().

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
---
 mm/huge_memory.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index 9d3594df6eedf..067259a9e0809 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -1153,13 +1153,25 @@ split_queue_lock_irqsave(int nid, struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned long *flags
 
 static struct deferred_split *folio_split_queue_lock(struct folio *folio)
 {
-	return split_queue_lock(folio_nid(folio), folio_memcg(folio));
+	struct deferred_split *queue;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	queue = split_queue_lock(folio_nid(folio), folio_memcg(folio));
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+
+	return queue;
 }
 
 static struct deferred_split *
 folio_split_queue_lock_irqsave(struct folio *folio, unsigned long *flags)
 {
-	return split_queue_lock_irqsave(folio_nid(folio), folio_memcg(folio), flags);
+	struct deferred_split *queue;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	queue = split_queue_lock_irqsave(folio_nid(folio), folio_memcg(folio), flags);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+
+	return queue;
 }
 
 static inline void split_queue_unlock(struct deferred_split *queue)
-- 
2.20.1

On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 09:58:29PM +0800, Qi Zheng wrote:
> From: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
> 
> In the near future, a folio will no longer pin its corresponding memory
> cgroup. To ensure safety, it will only be appropriate to hold the rcu read
> lock or acquire a reference to the memory cgroup returned by
> folio_memcg(), thereby preventing it from being released.
> 
> In the current patch, the rcu read lock is employed to safeguard against
> the release of the memory cgroup in folio_split_queue_lock{_irqsave}().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
> ---

Looks good to me,
Reviewed-by: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>

Yeah, once we acquire the split-queue lock, the split queue won't
disappear under us because the reparenting logic also takes the same
lock before reparenting.

-- 
Cheers,
Harry / Hyeonggon