[PATCH v4 04/31] clk: at91: clk-sam9x60-pll: use clk_parent_data

Ryan.Wanner@microchip.com posted 31 patches 4 months, 3 weeks ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH v4 04/31] clk: at91: clk-sam9x60-pll: use clk_parent_data
Posted by Ryan.Wanner@microchip.com 4 months, 3 weeks ago
From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>

Use struct clk_parent_data instead of struct parent_hw as this leads
to less usage of __clk_get_hw() in SoC specific clock drivers and simpler
conversion of existing SoC specific clock drivers from parent_names to
modern clk_parent_data structures. As clk-sam9x60-pll need to know
parent's rate at initialization we pass it now from SoC specific drivers.
This will lead in the end at removing __clk_get_hw() in SoC specific
drivers (that will be solved by subsequent commits).

Get the main_xtal name via of_clk_get_parent_name() to consistently get
the correct name for the main_xtal.

Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>
[ryan.wanner@microchip.com: Add SAMA7D65 and SAM9X75 SoCs to the change set.]
Signed-off-by: Ryan Wanner <Ryan.Wanner@microchip.com>
---
 drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c | 14 +++++---------
 drivers/clk/at91/pmc.h             |  5 +++--
 drivers/clk/at91/sam9x60.c         |  8 +++++---
 drivers/clk/at91/sam9x7.c          | 16 +++++++++++-----
 drivers/clk/at91/sama7d65.c        | 25 ++++++++++++++-----------
 drivers/clk/at91/sama7g5.c         | 26 +++++++++++++++-----------
 6 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c
index 3dc75a394ce1..9895881c67d7 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c
@@ -630,19 +630,19 @@ static const struct clk_ops sam9x60_fixed_div_pll_ops = {
 
 struct clk_hw * __init
 sam9x60_clk_register_frac_pll(struct regmap *regmap, spinlock_t *lock,
-			      const char *name, const char *parent_name,
-			      struct clk_hw *parent_hw, u8 id,
+			      const char *name, const struct clk_parent_data *parent_data,
+			      unsigned long parent_rate, u8 id,
 			      const struct clk_pll_characteristics *characteristics,
 			      const struct clk_pll_layout *layout, u32 flags)
 {
 	struct sam9x60_frac *frac;
 	struct clk_hw *hw;
 	struct clk_init_data init = {};
-	unsigned long parent_rate, irqflags;
+	unsigned long irqflags;
 	unsigned int val;
 	int ret;
 
-	if (id > PLL_MAX_ID || !lock || !parent_hw)
+	if (id > PLL_MAX_ID || !lock || !parent_data)
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 
 	frac = kzalloc(sizeof(*frac), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -650,10 +650,7 @@ sam9x60_clk_register_frac_pll(struct regmap *regmap, spinlock_t *lock,
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 
 	init.name = name;
-	if (parent_name)
-		init.parent_names = &parent_name;
-	else
-		init.parent_hws = (const struct clk_hw **)&parent_hw;
+	init.parent_data = (const struct clk_parent_data *)parent_data;
 	init.num_parents = 1;
 	if (flags & CLK_SET_RATE_GATE)
 		init.ops = &sam9x60_frac_pll_ops;
@@ -684,7 +681,6 @@ sam9x60_clk_register_frac_pll(struct regmap *regmap, spinlock_t *lock,
 		 * its rate leading to enabling this PLL with unsupported
 		 * rate. This will lead to PLL not being locked at all.
 		 */
-		parent_rate = clk_hw_get_rate(parent_hw);
 		if (!parent_rate) {
 			hw = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 			goto free;
diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/pmc.h b/drivers/clk/at91/pmc.h
index 16c2559889aa..d3fc38cf90eb 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/at91/pmc.h
+++ b/drivers/clk/at91/pmc.h
@@ -258,8 +258,9 @@ sam9x60_clk_register_div_pll(struct regmap *regmap, spinlock_t *lock,
 
 struct clk_hw * __init
 sam9x60_clk_register_frac_pll(struct regmap *regmap, spinlock_t *lock,
-			      const char *name, const char *parent_name,
-			      struct clk_hw *parent_hw, u8 id,
+			      const char *name,
+			      const struct clk_parent_data *parent_data,
+			      unsigned long parent_rate, u8 id,
 			      const struct clk_pll_characteristics *characteristics,
 			      const struct clk_pll_layout *layout, u32 flags);
 
diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/sam9x60.c b/drivers/clk/at91/sam9x60.c
index 18baf4a256f4..bee35c65aceb 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/at91/sam9x60.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/at91/sam9x60.c
@@ -242,7 +242,8 @@ static void __init sam9x60_pmc_setup(struct device_node *np)
 	sam9x60_pmc->chws[PMC_MAIN] = hw;
 
 	hw = sam9x60_clk_register_frac_pll(regmap, &pmc_pll_lock, "pllack_fracck",
-					   "mainck", sam9x60_pmc->chws[PMC_MAIN],
+					   &AT91_CLK_PD_HW(sam9x60_pmc->chws[PMC_MAIN]),
+					   clk_hw_get_rate(sam9x60_pmc->chws[PMC_MAIN]),
 					   0, &plla_characteristics,
 					   &pll_frac_layout,
 					   /*
@@ -268,8 +269,9 @@ static void __init sam9x60_pmc_setup(struct device_node *np)
 	sam9x60_pmc->chws[PMC_PLLACK] = hw;
 
 	hw = sam9x60_clk_register_frac_pll(regmap, &pmc_pll_lock, "upllck_fracck",
-					   "main_osc", main_osc_hw, 1,
-					   &upll_characteristics,
+					   &AT91_CLK_PD_HW(main_osc_hw),
+					   clk_hw_get_rate(main_osc_hw),
+					   1, &upll_characteristics,
 					   &pll_frac_layout, CLK_SET_RATE_GATE);
 	if (IS_ERR(hw))
 		goto err_free;
diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/sam9x7.c b/drivers/clk/at91/sam9x7.c
index cb5849da494f..c80306715d90 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/at91/sam9x7.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/at91/sam9x7.c
@@ -752,6 +752,7 @@ static void __init sam9x7_pmc_setup(struct device_node *np)
 	struct regmap *regmap;
 	struct clk_hw *hw, *main_rc_hw, *main_osc_hw, *main_xtal_hw;
 	struct clk_hw *td_slck_hw, *md_slck_hw, *usbck_hw;
+	static struct clk_parent_data parent_data;
 	struct clk_hw *parent_hws[9];
 	int i, j;
 
@@ -799,7 +800,7 @@ static void __init sam9x7_pmc_setup(struct device_node *np)
 
 	for (i = 0; i < PLL_ID_MAX; i++) {
 		for (j = 0; j < PLL_COMPID_MAX; j++) {
-			struct clk_hw *parent_hw;
+			unsigned long parent_rate;
 
 			if (!sam9x7_plls[i][j].n)
 				continue;
@@ -808,21 +809,26 @@ static void __init sam9x7_pmc_setup(struct device_node *np)
 			case PLL_TYPE_FRAC:
 				switch (sam9x7_plls[i][j].p) {
 				case SAM9X7_PLL_PARENT_MAINCK:
-					parent_hw = sam9x7_pmc->chws[PMC_MAIN];
+					parent_data = AT91_CLK_PD_NAME("mainck");
+					hw = sam9x7_pmc->chws[PMC_MAIN];
 					break;
 				case SAM9X7_PLL_PARENT_MAIN_XTAL:
-					parent_hw = main_xtal_hw;
+					parent_data = AT91_CLK_PD_NAME(main_xtal_name);
+					hw = main_xtal_hw;
 					break;
 				default:
 					/* Should not happen. */
-					parent_hw = NULL;
 					break;
 				}
 
+				parent_rate = clk_hw_get_rate(hw);
+				if (!parent_rate)
+					return;
+
 				hw = sam9x60_clk_register_frac_pll(regmap,
 								   &pmc_pll_lock,
 								   sam9x7_plls[i][j].n,
-								   NULL, parent_hw, i,
+								   &parent_data, parent_rate, i,
 								   sam9x7_plls[i][j].c,
 								   sam9x7_plls[i][j].l,
 								   sam9x7_plls[i][j].f);
diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/sama7d65.c b/drivers/clk/at91/sama7d65.c
index ec2ef1a0249a..6229b7dfbea1 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/at91/sama7d65.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/at91/sama7d65.c
@@ -1093,7 +1093,7 @@ static const struct clk_pcr_layout sama7d65_pcr_layout = {
 
 static void __init sama7d65_pmc_setup(struct device_node *np)
 {
-	const char *main_xtal_name = "main_xtal";
+	const char *main_xtal_name;
 	struct pmc_data *sama7d65_pmc;
 	const char *parent_names[11];
 	void **alloc_mem = NULL;
@@ -1108,10 +1108,11 @@ static void __init sama7d65_pmc_setup(struct device_node *np)
 
 	td_slck_hw = __clk_get_hw(of_clk_get_by_name(np, "td_slck"));
 	md_slck_hw = __clk_get_hw(of_clk_get_by_name(np, "md_slck"));
-	main_xtal_hw = __clk_get_hw(of_clk_get_by_name(np, main_xtal_name));
+	i = of_property_match_string(np, "clock-names", "main_xtal");
 
-	if (!td_slck_hw || !md_slck_hw || !main_xtal_hw)
+	if (!td_slck_hw || !md_slck_hw || !i)
 		return;
+	main_xtal_name = of_clk_get_parent_name(np, i);
 
 	regmap = device_node_to_regmap(np);
 	if (IS_ERR(regmap))
@@ -1137,10 +1138,8 @@ static void __init sama7d65_pmc_setup(struct device_node *np)
 
 	bypass = of_property_read_bool(np, "atmel,osc-bypass");
 
-	parent_data.name = main_xtal_name;
-	parent_data.fw_name = main_xtal_name;
 	main_osc_hw = at91_clk_register_main_osc(regmap, "main_osc", NULL,
-						 &parent_data, bypass);
+						 &AT91_CLK_PD_NAME(main_xtal_name), bypass);
 	if (IS_ERR(main_osc_hw))
 		goto err_free;
 
@@ -1154,7 +1153,7 @@ static void __init sama7d65_pmc_setup(struct device_node *np)
 
 	for (i = 0; i < PLL_ID_MAX; i++) {
 		for (j = 0; j < PLL_COMPID_MAX; j++) {
-			struct clk_hw *parent_hw;
+			unsigned long parent_rate;
 
 			if (!sama7d65_plls[i][j].n)
 				continue;
@@ -1163,20 +1162,24 @@ static void __init sama7d65_pmc_setup(struct device_node *np)
 			case PLL_TYPE_FRAC:
 				switch (sama7d65_plls[i][j].p) {
 				case SAMA7D65_PLL_PARENT_MAINCK:
-					parent_hw = sama7d65_pmc->chws[PMC_MAIN];
+					parent_data = AT91_CLK_PD_NAME("mainck");
+					hw = sama7d65_pmc->chws[PMC_MAIN];
 					break;
 				case SAMA7D65_PLL_PARENT_MAIN_XTAL:
-					parent_hw = main_xtal_hw;
+					parent_data = AT91_CLK_PD_NAME(main_xtal_name);
+					hw = main_xtal_hw;
 					break;
 				default:
 					/* Should not happen. */
-					parent_hw = NULL;
 					break;
 				}
+				parent_rate = clk_hw_get_rate(hw);
+				if (!parent_rate)
+					return;
 
 				hw = sam9x60_clk_register_frac_pll(regmap,
 					&pmc_pll_lock, sama7d65_plls[i][j].n,
-					NULL, parent_hw, i,
+					&parent_data, parent_rate, i,
 					sama7d65_plls[i][j].c,
 					sama7d65_plls[i][j].l,
 					sama7d65_plls[i][j].f);
diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/sama7g5.c b/drivers/clk/at91/sama7g5.c
index 713f5dfe7be2..654c9f43fcf8 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/at91/sama7g5.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/at91/sama7g5.c
@@ -971,7 +971,7 @@ static const struct clk_pcr_layout sama7g5_pcr_layout = {
 
 static void __init sama7g5_pmc_setup(struct device_node *np)
 {
-	const char *main_xtal_name = "main_xtal";
+	const char *main_xtal_name;
 	struct pmc_data *sama7g5_pmc;
 	void **alloc_mem = NULL;
 	int alloc_mem_size = 0;
@@ -985,10 +985,11 @@ static void __init sama7g5_pmc_setup(struct device_node *np)
 
 	td_slck_hw = __clk_get_hw(of_clk_get_by_name(np, "td_slck"));
 	md_slck_hw = __clk_get_hw(of_clk_get_by_name(np, "md_slck"));
-	main_xtal_hw = __clk_get_hw(of_clk_get_by_name(np, main_xtal_name));
+	i = of_property_match_string(np, "clock-names", "main_xtal");
 
-	if (!td_slck_hw || !md_slck_hw || !main_xtal_hw)
+	if (!td_slck_hw || !md_slck_hw || !i)
 		return;
+	main_xtal_name = of_clk_get_parent_name(np, i);
 
 	regmap = device_node_to_regmap(np);
 	if (IS_ERR(regmap))
@@ -1014,10 +1015,8 @@ static void __init sama7g5_pmc_setup(struct device_node *np)
 
 	bypass = of_property_read_bool(np, "atmel,osc-bypass");
 
-	parent_data.name = main_xtal_name;
-	parent_data.fw_name = main_xtal_name;
 	main_osc_hw = at91_clk_register_main_osc(regmap, "main_osc", NULL,
-						 &parent_data, bypass);
+						 &AT91_CLK_PD_NAME(main_xtal_name), bypass);
 	if (IS_ERR(main_osc_hw))
 		goto err_free;
 
@@ -1031,7 +1030,7 @@ static void __init sama7g5_pmc_setup(struct device_node *np)
 
 	for (i = 0; i < PLL_ID_MAX; i++) {
 		for (j = 0; j < PLL_COMPID_MAX; j++) {
-			struct clk_hw *parent_hw;
+			unsigned long parent_rate;
 
 			if (!sama7g5_plls[i][j].n)
 				continue;
@@ -1040,20 +1039,25 @@ static void __init sama7g5_pmc_setup(struct device_node *np)
 			case PLL_TYPE_FRAC:
 				switch (sama7g5_plls[i][j].p) {
 				case SAMA7G5_PLL_PARENT_MAINCK:
-					parent_hw = sama7g5_pmc->chws[PMC_MAIN];
+					parent_data = AT91_CLK_PD_NAME("mainck");
+					hw = sama7g5_pmc->chws[PMC_MAIN];
 					break;
 				case SAMA7G5_PLL_PARENT_MAIN_XTAL:
-					parent_hw = main_xtal_hw;
+					parent_data = AT91_CLK_PD_NAME(main_xtal_name);
+					hw = main_xtal_hw;
 					break;
 				default:
 					/* Should not happen. */
-					parent_hw = NULL;
 					break;
 				}
 
+				parent_rate = clk_hw_get_rate(hw);
+				if (!parent_rate)
+					return;
+
 				hw = sam9x60_clk_register_frac_pll(regmap,
 					&pmc_pll_lock, sama7g5_plls[i][j].n,
-					NULL, parent_hw, i,
+					&parent_data, parent_rate, i,
 					sama7g5_plls[i][j].c,
 					sama7g5_plls[i][j].l,
 					sama7g5_plls[i][j].f);
-- 
2.43.0
Re: [PATCH v4 04/31] clk: at91: clk-sam9x60-pll: use clk_parent_data
Posted by Claudiu Beznea 3 months, 2 weeks ago
Hi, Ryan,

On 9/19/25 00:15, Ryan.Wanner@microchip.com wrote:
> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>
> 
> Use struct clk_parent_data instead of struct parent_hw as this leads
> to less usage of __clk_get_hw() in SoC specific clock drivers and simpler
> conversion of existing SoC specific clock drivers from parent_names to
> modern clk_parent_data structures. As clk-sam9x60-pll need to know
> parent's rate at initialization we pass it now from SoC specific drivers.
> This will lead in the end at removing __clk_get_hw() in SoC specific
> drivers (that will be solved by subsequent commits).
> 
> Get the main_xtal name via of_clk_get_parent_name() to consistently get
> the correct name for the main_xtal.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>
> [ryan.wanner@microchip.com: Add SAMA7D65 and SAM9X75 SoCs to the change set.]
> Signed-off-by: Ryan Wanner <Ryan.Wanner@microchip.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c | 14 +++++---------
>  drivers/clk/at91/pmc.h             |  5 +++--
>  drivers/clk/at91/sam9x60.c         |  8 +++++---
>  drivers/clk/at91/sam9x7.c          | 16 +++++++++++-----
>  drivers/clk/at91/sama7d65.c        | 25 ++++++++++++++-----------
>  drivers/clk/at91/sama7g5.c         | 26 +++++++++++++++-----------
>  6 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c
> index 3dc75a394ce1..9895881c67d7 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c
> @@ -630,19 +630,19 @@ static const struct clk_ops sam9x60_fixed_div_pll_ops = {
>  
>  struct clk_hw * __init
>  sam9x60_clk_register_frac_pll(struct regmap *regmap, spinlock_t *lock,
> -			      const char *name, const char *parent_name,
> -			      struct clk_hw *parent_hw, u8 id,
> +			      const char *name, const struct clk_parent_data *parent_data,
> +			      unsigned long parent_rate, u8 id,
>  			      const struct clk_pll_characteristics *characteristics,
>  			      const struct clk_pll_layout *layout, u32 flags)
>  {
>  	struct sam9x60_frac *frac;
>  	struct clk_hw *hw;
>  	struct clk_init_data init = {};
> -	unsigned long parent_rate, irqflags;
> +	unsigned long irqflags;
>  	unsigned int val;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	if (id > PLL_MAX_ID || !lock || !parent_hw)
> +	if (id > PLL_MAX_ID || !lock || !parent_data)
>  		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>  
>  	frac = kzalloc(sizeof(*frac), GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -650,10 +650,7 @@ sam9x60_clk_register_frac_pll(struct regmap *regmap, spinlock_t *lock,
>  		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>  
>  	init.name = name;
> -	if (parent_name)
> -		init.parent_names = &parent_name;
> -	else
> -		init.parent_hws = (const struct clk_hw **)&parent_hw;
> +	init.parent_data = (const struct clk_parent_data *)parent_data;
>  	init.num_parents = 1;
>  	if (flags & CLK_SET_RATE_GATE)
>  		init.ops = &sam9x60_frac_pll_ops;
> @@ -684,7 +681,6 @@ sam9x60_clk_register_frac_pll(struct regmap *regmap, spinlock_t *lock,
>  		 * its rate leading to enabling this PLL with unsupported
>  		 * rate. This will lead to PLL not being locked at all.
>  		 */
> -		parent_rate = clk_hw_get_rate(parent_hw);
>  		if (!parent_rate) {
>  			hw = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>  			goto free;
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/pmc.h b/drivers/clk/at91/pmc.h
> index 16c2559889aa..d3fc38cf90eb 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/at91/pmc.h
> +++ b/drivers/clk/at91/pmc.h
> @@ -258,8 +258,9 @@ sam9x60_clk_register_div_pll(struct regmap *regmap, spinlock_t *lock,
>  
>  struct clk_hw * __init
>  sam9x60_clk_register_frac_pll(struct regmap *regmap, spinlock_t *lock,
> -			      const char *name, const char *parent_name,
> -			      struct clk_hw *parent_hw, u8 id,
> +			      const char *name,
> +			      const struct clk_parent_data *parent_data,
> +			      unsigned long parent_rate, u8 id,
>  			      const struct clk_pll_characteristics *characteristics,
>  			      const struct clk_pll_layout *layout, u32 flags);
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/sam9x60.c b/drivers/clk/at91/sam9x60.c
> index 18baf4a256f4..bee35c65aceb 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/at91/sam9x60.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/at91/sam9x60.c
> @@ -242,7 +242,8 @@ static void __init sam9x60_pmc_setup(struct device_node *np)
>  	sam9x60_pmc->chws[PMC_MAIN] = hw;
>  
>  	hw = sam9x60_clk_register_frac_pll(regmap, &pmc_pll_lock, "pllack_fracck",
> -					   "mainck", sam9x60_pmc->chws[PMC_MAIN],
> +					   &AT91_CLK_PD_HW(sam9x60_pmc->chws[PMC_MAIN]),
> +					   clk_hw_get_rate(sam9x60_pmc->chws[PMC_MAIN]),
>  					   0, &plla_characteristics,
>  					   &pll_frac_layout,
>  					   /*
> @@ -268,8 +269,9 @@ static void __init sam9x60_pmc_setup(struct device_node *np)
>  	sam9x60_pmc->chws[PMC_PLLACK] = hw;
>  
>  	hw = sam9x60_clk_register_frac_pll(regmap, &pmc_pll_lock, "upllck_fracck",
> -					   "main_osc", main_osc_hw, 1,
> -					   &upll_characteristics,
> +					   &AT91_CLK_PD_HW(main_osc_hw),
> +					   clk_hw_get_rate(main_osc_hw),
> +					   1, &upll_characteristics,
>  					   &pll_frac_layout, CLK_SET_RATE_GATE);
>  	if (IS_ERR(hw))
>  		goto err_free;
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/sam9x7.c b/drivers/clk/at91/sam9x7.c
> index cb5849da494f..c80306715d90 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/at91/sam9x7.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/at91/sam9x7.c
> @@ -752,6 +752,7 @@ static void __init sam9x7_pmc_setup(struct device_node *np)
>  	struct regmap *regmap;
>  	struct clk_hw *hw, *main_rc_hw, *main_osc_hw, *main_xtal_hw;
>  	struct clk_hw *td_slck_hw, *md_slck_hw, *usbck_hw;
> +	static struct clk_parent_data parent_data;
>  	struct clk_hw *parent_hws[9];
>  	int i, j;
>  
> @@ -799,7 +800,7 @@ static void __init sam9x7_pmc_setup(struct device_node *np)
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < PLL_ID_MAX; i++) {
>  		for (j = 0; j < PLL_COMPID_MAX; j++) {
> -			struct clk_hw *parent_hw;
> +			unsigned long parent_rate;
>  
>  			if (!sam9x7_plls[i][j].n)
>  				continue;
> @@ -808,21 +809,26 @@ static void __init sam9x7_pmc_setup(struct device_node *np)
>  			case PLL_TYPE_FRAC:
>  				switch (sam9x7_plls[i][j].p) {
>  				case SAM9X7_PLL_PARENT_MAINCK:
> -					parent_hw = sam9x7_pmc->chws[PMC_MAIN];
> +					parent_data = AT91_CLK_PD_NAME("mainck");
> +					hw = sam9x7_pmc->chws[PMC_MAIN];
>  					break;
>  				case SAM9X7_PLL_PARENT_MAIN_XTAL:
> -					parent_hw = main_xtal_hw;
> +					parent_data = AT91_CLK_PD_NAME(main_xtal_name);
> +					hw = main_xtal_hw;
>  					break;
>  				default:
>  					/* Should not happen. */
> -					parent_hw = NULL;
>  					break;
>  				}
>  
> +				parent_rate = clk_hw_get_rate(hw);
> +				if (!parent_rate)
> +					return;
> +
>  				hw = sam9x60_clk_register_frac_pll(regmap,
>  								   &pmc_pll_lock,
>  								   sam9x7_plls[i][j].n,
> -								   NULL, parent_hw, i,
> +								   &parent_data, parent_rate, i,
>  								   sam9x7_plls[i][j].c,
>  								   sam9x7_plls[i][j].l,
>  								   sam9x7_plls[i][j].f);
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/sama7d65.c b/drivers/clk/at91/sama7d65.c
> index ec2ef1a0249a..6229b7dfbea1 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/at91/sama7d65.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/at91/sama7d65.c
> @@ -1093,7 +1093,7 @@ static const struct clk_pcr_layout sama7d65_pcr_layout = {
>  
>  static void __init sama7d65_pmc_setup(struct device_node *np)
>  {
> -	const char *main_xtal_name = "main_xtal";
> +	const char *main_xtal_name;
>  	struct pmc_data *sama7d65_pmc;
>  	const char *parent_names[11];
>  	void **alloc_mem = NULL;
> @@ -1108,10 +1108,11 @@ static void __init sama7d65_pmc_setup(struct device_node *np)
>  
>  	td_slck_hw = __clk_get_hw(of_clk_get_by_name(np, "td_slck"));
>  	md_slck_hw = __clk_get_hw(of_clk_get_by_name(np, "md_slck"));
> -	main_xtal_hw = __clk_get_hw(of_clk_get_by_name(np, main_xtal_name));
> +	i = of_property_match_string(np, "clock-names", "main_xtal");

Same as in the previous patch, please keep it close to
of_clk_get_parent_name() for main_xtal above and check check also negative
error numbers return by of_property_match_string(). Valid for the other
similar occurrences in this or next patches.