From: Axel Haslam <ahaslam@baylibre.com>
Pass the duty offset to the waveform pwm.
Signed-off-by: Axel Haslam <ahaslam@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt@analog.com>
---
drivers/spi/spi-offload-trigger-pwm.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-offload-trigger-pwm.c b/drivers/spi/spi-offload-trigger-pwm.c
index 805ed41560df..3e8c19227edb 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-offload-trigger-pwm.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-offload-trigger-pwm.c
@@ -51,12 +51,14 @@ static int spi_offload_trigger_pwm_validate(struct spi_offload_trigger *trigger,
wf.period_length_ns = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(NSEC_PER_SEC, periodic->frequency_hz);
/* REVISIT: 50% duty-cycle for now - may add config parameter later */
wf.duty_length_ns = wf.period_length_ns / 2;
+ wf.duty_offset_ns = periodic->offset_ns;
ret = pwm_round_waveform_might_sleep(st->pwm, &wf);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
periodic->frequency_hz = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(NSEC_PER_SEC, wf.period_length_ns);
+ periodic->offset_ns = wf.duty_offset_ns;
return 0;
}
@@ -77,6 +79,7 @@ static int spi_offload_trigger_pwm_enable(struct spi_offload_trigger *trigger,
wf.period_length_ns = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(NSEC_PER_SEC, periodic->frequency_hz);
/* REVISIT: 50% duty-cycle for now - may add config parameter later */
wf.duty_length_ns = wf.period_length_ns / 2;
+ wf.duty_offset_ns = periodic->offset_ns;
return pwm_set_waveform_might_sleep(st->pwm, &wf, false);
}
--
2.50.1
On 9/18/25 12:34 PM, Marcelo Schmitt wrote: > From: Axel Haslam <ahaslam@baylibre.com> > > Pass the duty offset to the waveform pwm. > > Signed-off-by: Axel Haslam <ahaslam@baylibre.com> > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt@analog.com> > --- > drivers/spi/spi-offload-trigger-pwm.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-offload-trigger-pwm.c b/drivers/spi/spi-offload-trigger-pwm.c > index 805ed41560df..3e8c19227edb 100644 > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-offload-trigger-pwm.c > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-offload-trigger-pwm.c > @@ -51,12 +51,14 @@ static int spi_offload_trigger_pwm_validate(struct spi_offload_trigger *trigger, > wf.period_length_ns = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(NSEC_PER_SEC, periodic->frequency_hz); > /* REVISIT: 50% duty-cycle for now - may add config parameter later */ > wf.duty_length_ns = wf.period_length_ns / 2; > + wf.duty_offset_ns = periodic->offset_ns; > > ret = pwm_round_waveform_might_sleep(st->pwm, &wf); > if (ret < 0) > return ret; > > periodic->frequency_hz = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(NSEC_PER_SEC, wf.period_length_ns); > + periodic->offset_ns = wf.duty_offset_ns; > > return 0; > } > @@ -77,6 +79,7 @@ static int spi_offload_trigger_pwm_enable(struct spi_offload_trigger *trigger, > wf.period_length_ns = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(NSEC_PER_SEC, periodic->frequency_hz); > /* REVISIT: 50% duty-cycle for now - may add config parameter later */ > wf.duty_length_ns = wf.period_length_ns / 2; > + wf.duty_offset_ns = periodic->offset_ns; > > return pwm_set_waveform_might_sleep(st->pwm, &wf, false); > } Does this really need to be a separate patch from the one that adds the field?
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.