On 9/12/25 12:28, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
>
> as a follup to the discussion I had with Gustavo in reply to
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pwm/aJtRPZpc-Lv-C6zD@kspp here comes my
> suggestion to improve TRAILING_OVERLAP() for wider audience.
>
> While working at it, I wonder if __packed should also better be part of the
> macro to ensure that
I have patch ready for this:
diff --git a/include/linux/stddef.h b/include/linux/stddef.h
index dab49e2ec8c0..b20ff76778d5 100644
--- a/include/linux/stddef.h
+++ b/include/linux/stddef.h
@@ -93,6 +93,14 @@ enum {
#define DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(TYPE, NAME) \
__DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(TYPE, NAME)
+#define __TRAILING_OVERLAP(TYPE, NAME, FAM, MEMBERS, ATTRS) \
+ union { \
+ TYPE NAME; \
+ struct { \
+ unsigned char __offset_to_##FAM[offsetof(TYPE, FAM)]; \
+ MEMBERS \
+ } ATTRS; \
+ }
/**
* TRAILING_OVERLAP() - Overlap a flexible-array member with trailing members.
*
Thanks
-Gustavo