Add DT Bindings for Synopsys D-PHY RX, presently tested on version 1.2
Signed-off-by: Karthik Poduval <kpoduval@lab126.com>
---
.../bindings/phy/snps,dw-dphy-rx.yaml | 44 +++++++++++++++++++
MAINTAINERS | 7 +++
2 files changed, 51 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/snps,dw-dphy-rx.yaml
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/snps,dw-dphy-rx.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/snps,dw-dphy-rx.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..c3c657b1e77d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/snps,dw-dphy-rx.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/snps,dw-dphy-rx.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Synopsys Designware MIPI D-PHY RX
+
+maintainers:
+ - Karthik Poduval <kpoduval@lab126.com>
+ - Jason Xiong <jyxiong@amazon.com>
+ - Miguel Lopes <miguel.lopes@synopsys.com
+
+description: |
+ These are the bindings for Synopsys Designware MIPI DPHY RX phy driver.
+ Currently only supported phy version is v1.2.
+
+properties:
+ compatible:
+ const: snps,dw-dphy-1p2
+
+ '#phy-cells':
+ const: 0
+
+ reg:
+ minItems: 2
+ maxItems: 2
+
+required:
+ - compatible
+ - '#phy-cells'
+ - reg
+
+additionalProperties: false
+
+examples:
+ - |
+ dw_dphy_rx: dw-dphy@900000040 {
+ compatible = "snps,dw-dphy-1p2";
+ #phy-cells = <0>;
+ reg = <0x0 0x90000040 0x0 0x20>, <0x0 0x90001000 0x0 0x8>;
+ status = "disabled";
+ };
+
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index b5a472a544cf..5fd5a92431bd 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -24217,6 +24217,13 @@ S: Maintained
F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/snps,dw-axi-dmac.yaml
F: drivers/dma/dw-axi-dmac/
+SYNOPSYS DESIGNWARE MIPI D-PHY RX DRIVER
+M: Karthik Poduval <kpoduval@lab126.com>
+M: Jason Xiong <jyxiong@amazon.com>
+M: Miguel Lopes <miguel.lopes@synopsys.com>
+S: Supported
+F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/snps,dw-dphy-rx.yaml
+
SYNOPSYS DESIGNWARE DMAC DRIVER
M: Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>
R: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
--
2.43.0
On 10/07/2025 04:42, Karthik Poduval wrote: > Add DT Bindings for Synopsys D-PHY RX, presently tested on version 1.2 > > Signed-off-by: Karthik Poduval <kpoduval@lab126.com> > --- > .../bindings/phy/snps,dw-dphy-rx.yaml | 44 +++++++++++++++++++ > MAINTAINERS | 7 +++ > 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+) Please use subject prefixes matching the subsystem. You can get them for example with `git log --oneline -- DIRECTORY_OR_FILE` on the directory your patch is touching. For bindings, the preferred subjects are explained here: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.html#i-for-patch-submitters Best regards, Krzysztof
On Wed, Jul 09, 2025 at 07:42:21PM -0700, Karthik Poduval wrote:
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/snps,dw-dphy-rx.yaml#
Filename and id should match compatible.
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Synopsys Designware MIPI D-PHY RX
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Karthik Poduval <kpoduval@lab126.com>
> + - Jason Xiong <jyxiong@amazon.com>
> + - Miguel Lopes <miguel.lopes@synopsys.com
> +
> +description: |
> + These are the bindings for Synopsys Designware MIPI DPHY RX phy driver.
> + Currently only supported phy version is v1.2.
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + const: snps,dw-dphy-1p2
You should rather use SoC compatibles.
> +
> + '#phy-cells':
> + const: 0
> +
> + reg:
> + minItems: 2
> + maxItems: 2
List the items instead
And fix the order, reg goes second.
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - '#phy-cells'
> + - reg
Here as well
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + dw_dphy_rx: dw-dphy@900000040 {
phy@
> + compatible = "snps,dw-dphy-1p2";
> + #phy-cells = <0>;
> + reg = <0x0 0x90000040 0x0 0x20>, <0x0 0x90001000 0x0 0x8>;
> + status = "disabled";
No, drop. And fix the order of properties, see DTS coding style.
> + };
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Hi Krzysztof,
Thanks for your comments.
On Thu, 2025-07-10 at 09:24 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do
> not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender
> and know the content is safe.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2025 at 07:42:21PM -0700, Karthik Poduval wrote:
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/snps,dw-dphy-rx.yaml#
>
> Filename and id should match compatible.
>
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: Synopsys Designware MIPI D-PHY RX
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > + - Karthik Poduval <kpoduval@lab126.com>
> > + - Jason Xiong <jyxiong@amazon.com>
> > + - Miguel Lopes <miguel.lopes@synopsys.com
> > +
> > +description: |
> > + These are the bindings for Synopsys Designware MIPI DPHY RX phy
> > driver.
> > + Currently only supported phy version is v1.2.
> > +
> > +properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + const: snps,dw-dphy-1p2
>
> You should rather use SoC compatibles.
If similar Synopsys D-PHY is used in multiple SoCs with slight
variations, should each SoC have its own D-PHY driver or is it better
to have a common one that works for all SoCs like arm,smmu-v3 or like
the EEPROM driver below ?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/misc/eeprom/eeprom_93xx46.c?h=v6.16-rc5#n391
where driver specific driver_data could support multiple versions or
SoC variations.
Our team thought of the common driver approach however looking for
general guidance from PHY subsystem maintainers and contributors.
>
> > +
> > + '#phy-cells':
> > + const: 0
> > +
> > + reg:
> > + minItems: 2
> > + maxItems: 2
>
> List the items instead
>
> And fix the order, reg goes second.
ack
>
> > +
> > +required:
> > + - compatible
> > + - '#phy-cells'
> > + - reg
>
> Here as well
ack
>
> > +
> > +additionalProperties: false
> > +
> > +examples:
> > + - |
> > + dw_dphy_rx: dw-dphy@900000040 {
>
> phy@
>
> > + compatible = "snps,dw-dphy-1p2";
> > + #phy-cells = <0>;
> > + reg = <0x0 0x90000040 0x0 0x20>, <0x0 0x90001000 0x0 0x8>;
> > + status = "disabled";
>
> No, drop. And fix the order of properties, see DTS coding style.
>
> > + };
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
On 10/07/2025 23:24, Poduval, Karthik wrote: >>> +maintainers: >>> + - Karthik Poduval <kpoduval@lab126.com> >>> + - Jason Xiong <jyxiong@amazon.com> >>> + - Miguel Lopes <miguel.lopes@synopsys.com >>> + >>> +description: | >>> + These are the bindings for Synopsys Designware MIPI DPHY RX phy >>> driver. >>> + Currently only supported phy version is v1.2. >>> + >>> +properties: >>> + compatible: >>> + const: snps,dw-dphy-1p2 >> >> You should rather use SoC compatibles. > If similar Synopsys D-PHY is used in multiple SoCs with slight > variations, should each SoC have its own D-PHY driver or is it better Your incorrect subject probably mislead you, but this is not a driver patch. These are DT bindings. SoC specific compatibles are almost always preferred. > to have a common one that works for all SoCs like arm,smmu-v3 or like > the EEPROM driver below ? > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/misc/eeprom/eeprom_93xx46.c?h=v6.16-rc5#n391 > where driver specific driver_data could support multiple versions or > SoC variations. > Our team thought of the common driver approach however looking for > general guidance from PHY subsystem maintainers and contributors. We don't discuss here driver. Best regards, Krzysztof
On Wed, Jul 09, 2025 at 07:42:21PM -0700, Karthik Poduval wrote:
> Add DT Bindings for Synopsys D-PHY RX, presently tested on version 1.2
>
> Signed-off-by: Karthik Poduval <kpoduval@lab126.com>
> ---
> .../bindings/phy/snps,dw-dphy-rx.yaml | 44 +++++++++++++++++++
> MAINTAINERS | 7 +++
> 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/snps,dw-dphy-rx.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/snps,dw-dphy-rx.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/snps,dw-dphy-rx.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..c3c657b1e77d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/snps,dw-dphy-rx.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/snps,dw-dphy-rx.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Synopsys Designware MIPI D-PHY RX
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Karthik Poduval <kpoduval@lab126.com>
> + - Jason Xiong <jyxiong@amazon.com>
> + - Miguel Lopes <miguel.lopes@synopsys.com
> +
> +description: |
Needn't |
> + These are the bindings for Synopsys Designware MIPI DPHY RX phy driver.
> + Currently only supported phy version is v1.2.
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + const: snps,dw-dphy-1p2
> +
> + '#phy-cells':
> + const: 0
> +
> + reg:
> + minItems: 2
> + maxItems: 2
items:
- description: ....
- description: ....
Not all dphy have second register.
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - '#phy-cells'
> + - reg
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + dw_dphy_rx: dw-dphy@900000040 {
> + compatible = "snps,dw-dphy-1p2";
> + #phy-cells = <0>;
> + reg = <0x0 0x90000040 0x0 0x20>, <0x0 0x90001000 0x0 0x8>;
Some DW MIPI CSI2 test1/test2 register is not tail part of whole MMIO space
such as imx93.
Frank
> + status = "disabled";
> + };
> +
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index b5a472a544cf..5fd5a92431bd 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -24217,6 +24217,13 @@ S: Maintained
> F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/snps,dw-axi-dmac.yaml
> F: drivers/dma/dw-axi-dmac/
>
> +SYNOPSYS DESIGNWARE MIPI D-PHY RX DRIVER
> +M: Karthik Poduval <kpoduval@lab126.com>
> +M: Jason Xiong <jyxiong@amazon.com>
> +M: Miguel Lopes <miguel.lopes@synopsys.com>
> +S: Supported
> +F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/snps,dw-dphy-rx.yaml
> +
> SYNOPSYS DESIGNWARE DMAC DRIVER
> M: Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>
> R: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> --
> 2.43.0
>
On Wed, 09 Jul 2025 19:42:21 -0700, Karthik Poduval wrote: > Add DT Bindings for Synopsys D-PHY RX, presently tested on version 1.2 > > Signed-off-by: Karthik Poduval <kpoduval@lab126.com> > --- > .../bindings/phy/snps,dw-dphy-rx.yaml | 44 +++++++++++++++++++ > MAINTAINERS | 7 +++ > 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/snps,dw-dphy-rx.yaml > My bot found errors running 'make dt_binding_check' on your patch: yamllint warnings/errors: dtschema/dtc warnings/errors: /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/snps,dw-dphy-rx.example.dtb: dw-dphy@900000040 (snps,dw-dphy-1p2): reg: [[0, 2415919168], [0, 32], [0, 2415923200], [0, 8]] is too long from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/snps,dw-dphy-rx.yaml# doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs): See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/7f4b676678b27ea91314c834a297c1e057959b09.1752106239.git.kpoduval@lab126.com The base for the series is generally the latest rc1. A different dependency should be noted in *this* patch. If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to date: pip3 install dtschema --upgrade Please check and re-submit after running the above command yourself. Note that DT_SCHEMA_FILES can be set to your schema file to speed up checking your schema. However, it must be unset to test all examples with your schema.
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.