[PATCH v2 4/4] serial: 8250_exar: Remove old exar_ee_read() and other unneeded code

Parker Newman posted 4 patches 2 months, 1 week ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH v2 4/4] serial: 8250_exar: Remove old exar_ee_read() and other unneeded code
Posted by Parker Newman 2 months, 1 week ago
From: Parker Newman <pnewman@connecttech.com>

Remove the old exar_ee_read() and associated helper functions as well as
some defines that are no longer needed after the switch to using the
eeprom_93cx6 driver.

Signed-off-by: Parker Newman <pnewman@connecttech.com>
---
 drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_exar.c | 90 -----------------------------
 1 file changed, 90 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_exar.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_exar.c
index c40e86920110..659a44b52f8d 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_exar.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_exar.c
@@ -136,8 +136,6 @@
 #define UART_EXAR_REGB_EECS		BIT(5)
 #define UART_EXAR_REGB_EEDI		BIT(6)
 #define UART_EXAR_REGB_EEDO		BIT(7)
-#define UART_EXAR_REGB_EE_ADDR_SIZE	6
-#define UART_EXAR_REGB_EE_DATA_SIZE	16

 #define UART_EXAR_XR17C15X_PORT_OFFSET	0x200
 #define UART_EXAR_XR17V25X_PORT_OFFSET	0x200
@@ -269,94 +267,6 @@ static inline u8 exar_read_reg(struct exar8250 *priv, unsigned int reg)
 	return readb(priv->virt + reg);
 }

-static inline void exar_ee_select(struct exar8250 *priv)
-{
-	// Set chip select pin high to enable EEPROM reads/writes
-	exar_write_reg(priv, UART_EXAR_REGB, UART_EXAR_REGB_EECS);
-	// Min ~500ns delay needed between CS assert and EEPROM access
-	udelay(1);
-}
-
-static inline void exar_ee_deselect(struct exar8250 *priv)
-{
-	exar_write_reg(priv, UART_EXAR_REGB, 0x00);
-}
-
-static inline void exar_ee_write_bit(struct exar8250 *priv, u8 bit)
-{
-	u8 value = UART_EXAR_REGB_EECS;
-
-	if (bit)
-		value |= UART_EXAR_REGB_EEDI;
-
-	// Clock out the bit on the EEPROM interface
-	exar_write_reg(priv, UART_EXAR_REGB, value);
-	// 2us delay = ~500khz clock speed
-	udelay(2);
-
-	value |= UART_EXAR_REGB_EECK;
-
-	exar_write_reg(priv, UART_EXAR_REGB, value);
-	udelay(2);
-}
-
-static inline u8 exar_ee_read_bit(struct exar8250 *priv)
-{
-	u8 regb;
-	u8 value = UART_EXAR_REGB_EECS;
-
-	// Clock in the bit on the EEPROM interface
-	exar_write_reg(priv, UART_EXAR_REGB, value);
-	// 2us delay = ~500khz clock speed
-	udelay(2);
-
-	value |= UART_EXAR_REGB_EECK;
-
-	exar_write_reg(priv, UART_EXAR_REGB, value);
-	udelay(2);
-
-	regb = exar_read_reg(priv, UART_EXAR_REGB);
-
-	return (regb & UART_EXAR_REGB_EEDO ? 1 : 0);
-}
-
-/**
- * exar_ee_read() - Read a word from the EEPROM
- * @priv: Device's private structure
- * @ee_addr: Offset of EEPROM to read word from
- *
- * Read a single 16bit word from an Exar UART's EEPROM.
- * The type of the EEPROM is AT93C46D.
- *
- * Return: EEPROM word
- */
-static u16 exar_ee_read(struct exar8250 *priv, u8 ee_addr)
-{
-	int i;
-	u16 data = 0;
-
-	exar_ee_select(priv);
-
-	// Send read command (opcode 110)
-	exar_ee_write_bit(priv, 1);
-	exar_ee_write_bit(priv, 1);
-	exar_ee_write_bit(priv, 0);
-
-	// Send address to read from
-	for (i = UART_EXAR_REGB_EE_ADDR_SIZE - 1; i >= 0; i--)
-		exar_ee_write_bit(priv, ee_addr & BIT(i));
-
-	// Read data 1 bit at a time starting with a dummy bit
-	for (i = UART_EXAR_REGB_EE_DATA_SIZE; i >= 0; i--) {
-		if (exar_ee_read_bit(priv))
-			data |= BIT(i);
-	}
-
-	exar_ee_deselect(priv);
-
-	return data;
-}
-
 static void exar_eeprom_93cx6_reg_read(struct eeprom_93cx6 *eeprom)
 {
 	struct exar8250 *priv = eeprom->data;
--
2.46.0
Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] serial: 8250_exar: Remove old exar_ee_read() and other unneeded code
Posted by Andy Shevchenko 2 months, 1 week ago
On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 10:03:24AM -0400, Parker Newman wrote:
> From: Parker Newman <pnewman@connecttech.com>
> 
> Remove the old exar_ee_read() and associated helper functions as well as
> some defines that are no longer needed after the switch to using the
> eeprom_93cx6 driver.

You missed my tag. If one sends a new version of the series, they are
responsible to take care about previously given tags.

I'm going to comment on the rest, but something tells me that you might
need a v3 of the series.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko