The block for datagram sending is a significantly bigger chunk of the
function compared to the other scenario.

Thus, put the significantly smaller block inside the if-block.

Signed-off-by: Siddh Raman Pant <code@siddh.me>
---
 net/nfc/llcp_sock.c | 32 +++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/nfc/llcp_sock.c b/net/nfc/llcp_sock.c
index 603f2219b62f..3f1a39e54aa1 100644
--- a/net/nfc/llcp_sock.c
+++ b/net/nfc/llcp_sock.c
@@ -795,34 +795,32 @@ static int llcp_sock_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
 		return -ENODEV;
 	}
 
-	if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_DGRAM) {
-		if (sk->sk_state != LLCP_BOUND) {
-			release_sock(sk);
-			return -ENOTCONN;
-		}
+	if (sk->sk_type != SOCK_DGRAM) {
+		release_sock(sk);
 
-		DECLARE_SOCKADDR(struct sockaddr_nfc_llcp *, addr,
-				 msg->msg_name);
+		if (sk->sk_state != LLCP_CONNECTED)
+			return -ENOTCONN;
 
-		if (msg->msg_namelen < sizeof(*addr)) {
-			release_sock(sk);
-			return -EINVAL;
-		}
+		return nfc_llcp_send_i_frame(llcp_sock, msg, len);
+	}
 
+	if (sk->sk_state != LLCP_BOUND) {
 		release_sock(sk);
-
-		return nfc_llcp_send_ui_frame(llcp_sock, addr->dsap, addr->ssap,
-					      msg, len);
+		return -ENOTCONN;
 	}
 
-	if (sk->sk_state != LLCP_CONNECTED) {
+	DECLARE_SOCKADDR(struct sockaddr_nfc_llcp *, addr, msg->msg_name);
+
+	if (msg->msg_namelen < sizeof(*addr)) {
 		release_sock(sk);
-		return -ENOTCONN;
+		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
 	release_sock(sk);
 
-	return nfc_llcp_send_i_frame(llcp_sock, msg, len);
+	return nfc_llcp_send_ui_frame(llcp_sock, addr->dsap, addr->ssap,
+				      msg, len);
+
 }
 
 static int llcp_sock_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
-- 
2.42.0

On 25/11/2023 21:26, Siddh Raman Pant wrote:
> The block for datagram sending is a significantly bigger chunk of the
> function compared to the other scenario.
> 
> Thus, put the significantly smaller block inside the if-block.
> 


>  
> +	if (sk->sk_state != LLCP_BOUND) {
>  		release_sock(sk);
> -
> -		return nfc_llcp_send_ui_frame(llcp_sock, addr->dsap, addr->ssap,
> -					      msg, len);
> +		return -ENOTCONN;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (sk->sk_state != LLCP_CONNECTED) {
> +	DECLARE_SOCKADDR(struct sockaddr_nfc_llcp *, addr, msg->msg_name);

No, this code is not readable. I don't think this change helps in anything.

> +
> +	if (msg->msg_namelen < sizeof(*addr)) {
>  		release_sock(sk);
> -		return -ENOTCONN;
> +		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
>  	release_sock(sk);
>  
> -	return nfc_llcp_send_i_frame(llcp_sock, msg, len);
> +	return nfc_llcp_send_ui_frame(llcp_sock, addr->dsap, addr->ssap,
> +				      msg, len);
> +

Stray blank line.


Best regards,
Krzysztof