drm_print.h says DRM_INFO is deprecated in favor of drm_info().
Signed-off-by: Siddh Raman Pant <code@siddh.me>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c | 7 ++++---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pci.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c
index 1b12a3c201a3..ae19734974b5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c
@@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ static bool drm_client_target_cloned(struct drm_device *dev,
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("can clone using 1024x768\n");
return true;
}
- DRM_INFO("kms: can't enable cloning when we probably wanted to.\n");
+ drm_info(dev, "kms: can't enable cloning when we probably wanted to.\n");
return false;
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c
index 48df7a5ea503..dca8dd4ab93f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c
@@ -168,13 +168,14 @@ static void drm_connector_get_cmdline_mode(struct drm_connector *connector)
return;
if (mode->force) {
- DRM_INFO("forcing %s connector %s\n", connector->name,
- drm_get_connector_force_name(mode->force));
+ drm_info(connector->dev, "forcing %s connector %s\n",
+ connector->name, drm_get_connector_force_name(mode->force));
connector->force = mode->force;
}
if (mode->panel_orientation != DRM_MODE_PANEL_ORIENTATION_UNKNOWN) {
- DRM_INFO("cmdline forces connector %s panel_orientation to %d\n",
+ drm_info(connector->dev,
+ "cmdline forces connector %s panel_orientation to %d\n",
connector->name, mode->panel_orientation);
drm_connector_set_panel_orientation(connector,
mode->panel_orientation);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
index 12687dd9e1ac..02eaa4c9344d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
@@ -943,7 +943,7 @@ int drm_dev_register(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned long flags)
if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET))
drm_modeset_register_all(dev);
- DRM_INFO("Initialized %s %d.%d.%d %s for %s on minor %d\n",
+ drm_info(dev, "Initialized %s %d.%d.%d %s for %s on minor %d\n",
driver->name, driver->major, driver->minor,
driver->patchlevel, driver->date,
dev->dev ? dev_name(dev->dev) : "virtual device",
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pci.c
index 39d35fc3a43b..7dfb837d1325 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pci.c
@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ void drm_legacy_pci_exit(const struct drm_driver *driver,
}
mutex_unlock(&legacy_dev_list_lock);
}
- DRM_INFO("Module unloaded\n");
+ drm_info(NULL, "Module unloaded\n");
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_legacy_pci_exit);
--
2.39.2
Hi Siddh, Thank you for the patch. On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 04:15:17PM +0530, Siddh Raman Pant wrote: > drm_print.h says DRM_INFO is deprecated in favor of drm_info(). > > Signed-off-by: Siddh Raman Pant <code@siddh.me> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c | 7 ++++--- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pci.c | 2 +- Any plan to remove it from drivers as well ? If not you should mention in the commit message (probably in the subject line itself) that you're only addressing the DRM core. Same comment for further patches in this series. > 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c > index 1b12a3c201a3..ae19734974b5 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c > @@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ static bool drm_client_target_cloned(struct drm_device *dev, > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("can clone using 1024x768\n"); > return true; > } > - DRM_INFO("kms: can't enable cloning when we probably wanted to.\n"); > + drm_info(dev, "kms: can't enable cloning when we probably wanted to.\n"); > return false; > } > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c > index 48df7a5ea503..dca8dd4ab93f 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c > @@ -168,13 +168,14 @@ static void drm_connector_get_cmdline_mode(struct drm_connector *connector) > return; > > if (mode->force) { > - DRM_INFO("forcing %s connector %s\n", connector->name, > - drm_get_connector_force_name(mode->force)); > + drm_info(connector->dev, "forcing %s connector %s\n", > + connector->name, drm_get_connector_force_name(mode->force)); > connector->force = mode->force; > } > > if (mode->panel_orientation != DRM_MODE_PANEL_ORIENTATION_UNKNOWN) { > - DRM_INFO("cmdline forces connector %s panel_orientation to %d\n", > + drm_info(connector->dev, > + "cmdline forces connector %s panel_orientation to %d\n", > connector->name, mode->panel_orientation); > drm_connector_set_panel_orientation(connector, > mode->panel_orientation); > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c > index 12687dd9e1ac..02eaa4c9344d 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c > @@ -943,7 +943,7 @@ int drm_dev_register(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned long flags) > if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET)) > drm_modeset_register_all(dev); > > - DRM_INFO("Initialized %s %d.%d.%d %s for %s on minor %d\n", > + drm_info(dev, "Initialized %s %d.%d.%d %s for %s on minor %d\n", > driver->name, driver->major, driver->minor, > driver->patchlevel, driver->date, > dev->dev ? dev_name(dev->dev) : "virtual device", > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pci.c > index 39d35fc3a43b..7dfb837d1325 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pci.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pci.c > @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ void drm_legacy_pci_exit(const struct drm_driver *driver, > } > mutex_unlock(&legacy_dev_list_lock); > } > - DRM_INFO("Module unloaded\n"); > + drm_info(NULL, "Module unloaded\n"); > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_legacy_pci_exit); > -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart
On Tue, 06 Jun 2023 19:53:22 +0530, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Siddh, > > Thank you for the patch. Anytime :) > Any plan to remove it from drivers as well ? If not you should mention > in the commit message (probably in the subject line itself) that you're > only addressing the DRM core. > > Same comment for further patches in this series. Yeah, this patch set aims to replace just in drm core (as mentioned in the cover). I thought "drm" would suffice since I did not specify a specific driver like i915. So the subject line should say "drm core: ..."? Thanks, Siddh
On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 08:08:27PM +0530, Siddh Raman Pant wrote: > On Tue, 06 Jun 2023 19:53:22 +0530, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > Hi Siddh, > > > > Thank you for the patch. > > Anytime :) > > > Any plan to remove it from drivers as well ? If not you should mention > > in the commit message (probably in the subject line itself) that you're > > only addressing the DRM core. > > > > Same comment for further patches in this series. > > Yeah, this patch set aims to replace just in drm core (as mentioned in > the cover). > > I thought "drm" would suffice since I did not specify a specific driver > like i915. So the subject line should say "drm core: ..."? I would write drm: Remove usage of deprecated DRM_INFO in DRM core The "drm: " prefix doesn't imply you're touching the core only, you could do a tree-wide change that also touches all drivers. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart
On Tue, 06 Jun 2023 20:16:25 +0530, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > I would write > > drm: Remove usage of deprecated DRM_INFO in DRM core > > The "drm: " prefix doesn't imply you're touching the core only, you > could do a tree-wide change that also touches all drivers. Okay, will send a v10 with the change after resolving discussions in other emails, if any. Thanks, Siddh
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.