Hi, Willy

Thanks very much for your merge of the v3 generic part1 of rv32, just
tested your latest 20230604-nolibc-rv32+stkp6 branch, everything work
well except a trivial test report regression on the 'run' target.

Besides the fixup, a standalone test-report target added to share them
among run, run-user and re-run and allow independent test report check
via direct 'make test-report'.

Best regards,
Zhangjin
---

Zhangjin Wu (4):
  selftests/nolibc: add a test-report target
  selftests/nolibc: allow run test-report directly
  selftests/nolibc: always print the log file
  selftests/nolibc: fix up test-report for run target

 tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile | 30 ++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

-- 
2.25.1

On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 11:47:41AM +0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote:
> Thanks very much for your merge of the v3 generic part1 of rv32, just
> tested your latest 20230604-nolibc-rv32+stkp6 branch, everything work
> well except a trivial test report regression on the 'run' target.
(...)

I've squashed your fix into the pending patch and pushed branch
20230605-nolibc-rv32+stkp7. I have only tested userland (I really
need to leave now, no time for a kernel build).

Zhangjin and Thomas, now that your last two fixes are merged, I'm
assuming that Paul can take the branch any time. If you're seeing a
showstopper that needs to be fixed, please let him know, and I'll
deal with it once I'm connected again, but please no more attempts
to further improve that branch for now (i.e. consider it merged for
any future work so that we can finally settle on something).

Thanks!
Willy

> On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 11:47:41AM +0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote:
> > Thanks very much for your merge of the v3 generic part1 of rv32, just
> > tested your latest 20230604-nolibc-rv32+stkp6 branch, everything work
> > well except a trivial test report regression on the 'run' target.
> (...)
> 
> I've squashed your fix into the pending patch and pushed branch
> 20230605-nolibc-rv32+stkp7. I have only tested userland (I really
> need to leave now, no time for a kernel build).
>

Just did kernel build + nolibc test for arm, aarch64 and rv64, no regressions
found.

> Zhangjin and Thomas, now that your last two fixes are merged, I'm
> assuming that Paul can take the branch any time. If you're seeing a
> showstopper that needs to be fixed, please let him know, and I'll
> deal with it once I'm connected again, but please no more attempts
> to further improve that branch for now (i.e. consider it merged for
> any future work so that we can finally settle on something).

Ok, let's work on v6.6 ;-)

Best regards,
Zhangjin

> 
> Thanks!
> Willy

On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 06:53:32PM +0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 11:47:41AM +0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote:
> > > Thanks very much for your merge of the v3 generic part1 of rv32, just
> > > tested your latest 20230604-nolibc-rv32+stkp6 branch, everything work
> > > well except a trivial test report regression on the 'run' target.
> > (...)
> > 
> > I've squashed your fix into the pending patch and pushed branch
> > 20230605-nolibc-rv32+stkp7. I have only tested userland (I really
> > need to leave now, no time for a kernel build).
> >
> 
> Just did kernel build + nolibc test for arm, aarch64 and rv64, no regressions
> found.

Much appreciated, thank you. This evening I'll try the remaining
archs as I already have the cross-compilers, then will give Paul
the go.

Cheers,
Willy