On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 12:18:17PM -0500, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> The 104-DIO-48E lacks an IRQ status register. Rather than use the Clear
> Interrupt register as the status register, set the no_status flag to
> true and thus avoid such a hack.
FWIW,
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: William Breathitt Gray <william.gray@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-104-dio-48e.c | 6 +-----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-104-dio-48e.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-104-dio-48e.c
> index a3846faf3780..fe3c93bfe4bd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-104-dio-48e.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-104-dio-48e.c
> @@ -195,13 +195,9 @@ static int dio48e_probe(struct device *dev, unsigned int id)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> chip->name = name;
> - /* No IRQ status register so use CLEAR_INTERRUPT register instead */
> - chip->status_base = DIO48E_CLEAR_INTERRUPT;
> chip->mask_base = DIO48E_ENABLE_INTERRUPT;
> chip->ack_base = DIO48E_CLEAR_INTERRUPT;
> - /* CLEAR_INTERRUPT doubles as status register so we need it cleared */
> - chip->clear_ack = true;
> - chip->status_invert = true;
> + chip->no_status = true;
> chip->num_regs = 1;
> chip->irqs = dio48e_regmap_irqs;
> chip->num_irqs = ARRAY_SIZE(dio48e_regmap_irqs);
> --
> 2.39.1
>
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko