[PATCH 09/30] ACPI: sysfs: Use kstrtobool() instead of strtobool()

Christophe JAILLET posted 30 patches 3 years, 5 months ago
[PATCH 09/30] ACPI: sysfs: Use kstrtobool() instead of strtobool()
Posted by Christophe JAILLET 3 years, 5 months ago
strtobool() is the same as kstrtobool().
However, the latter is more used within the kernel.

In order to remove strtobool() and slightly simplify kstrtox.h, switch to
the other function name.

While at it, include the corresponding header file (<linux/kstrtox.h>)

Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
---
This patch is part of a serie that axes all usages of strtobool().
Each patch can be applied independently from the other ones.

The last patch of the serie removes the definition of strtobool().

You may not be in copy of the cover letter. So, if needed, it is available
at [1].

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1667336095.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr/
---
 drivers/acpi/sysfs.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/sysfs.c b/drivers/acpi/sysfs.c
index cc2fe0618178..2d81c742e4d2 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/sysfs.c
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 #include <linux/bitmap.h>
 #include <linux/init.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/kstrtox.h>
 #include <linux/moduleparam.h>
 
 #include "internal.h"
@@ -992,7 +993,7 @@ static ssize_t force_remove_store(struct kobject *kobj,
 	bool val;
 	int ret;
 
-	ret = strtobool(buf, &val);
+	ret = kstrtobool(buf, &val);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
-- 
2.34.1
Re: [PATCH 09/30] ACPI: sysfs: Use kstrtobool() instead of strtobool()
Posted by Andy Shevchenko 3 years, 5 months ago
On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 10:13:57PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> strtobool() is the same as kstrtobool().
> However, the latter is more used within the kernel.
> 
> In order to remove strtobool() and slightly simplify kstrtox.h, switch to
> the other function name.
> 
> While at it, include the corresponding header file (<linux/kstrtox.h>)

Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>

> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
> ---
> This patch is part of a serie that axes all usages of strtobool().
> Each patch can be applied independently from the other ones.
> 
> The last patch of the serie removes the definition of strtobool().
> 
> You may not be in copy of the cover letter. So, if needed, it is available
> at [1].
> 
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1667336095.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr/
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/sysfs.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/sysfs.c b/drivers/acpi/sysfs.c
> index cc2fe0618178..2d81c742e4d2 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/sysfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/sysfs.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>  #include <linux/bitmap.h>
>  #include <linux/init.h>
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/kstrtox.h>
>  #include <linux/moduleparam.h>
>  
>  #include "internal.h"
> @@ -992,7 +993,7 @@ static ssize_t force_remove_store(struct kobject *kobj,
>  	bool val;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	ret = strtobool(buf, &val);
> +	ret = kstrtobool(buf, &val);
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 
> 

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Re: [PATCH 09/30] ACPI: sysfs: Use kstrtobool() instead of strtobool()
Posted by Rafael J. Wysocki 3 years, 5 months ago
On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 12:33 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 10:13:57PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> > strtobool() is the same as kstrtobool().
> > However, the latter is more used within the kernel.
> >
> > In order to remove strtobool() and slightly simplify kstrtox.h, switch to
> > the other function name.
> >
> > While at it, include the corresponding header file (<linux/kstrtox.h>)
>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
>
> > Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
> > ---
> > This patch is part of a serie that axes all usages of strtobool().
> > Each patch can be applied independently from the other ones.
> >
> > The last patch of the serie removes the definition of strtobool().
> >
> > You may not be in copy of the cover letter. So, if needed, it is available
> > at [1].
> >
> > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1667336095.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr/
> > ---
> >  drivers/acpi/sysfs.c | 3 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/sysfs.c b/drivers/acpi/sysfs.c
> > index cc2fe0618178..2d81c742e4d2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/sysfs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/sysfs.c
> > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/bitmap.h>
> >  #include <linux/init.h>
> >  #include <linux/kernel.h>
> > +#include <linux/kstrtox.h>
> >  #include <linux/moduleparam.h>
> >
> >  #include "internal.h"
> > @@ -992,7 +993,7 @@ static ssize_t force_remove_store(struct kobject *kobj,
> >       bool val;
> >       int ret;
> >
> > -     ret = strtobool(buf, &val);
> > +     ret = kstrtobool(buf, &val);
> >       if (ret < 0)
> >               return ret;
> >
> > --

Applied as 6.2 material, thanks!