1. Patchew
  2. linux
  3. [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/3] bpf: Small nf_conn cleanups
  4. View patch

[PATCH bpf-next v2 3/3] bpf: Move nf_conn extern declarations to filter.h

Daniel Xu posted 3 patches 3 years, 6 months ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH bpf-next v2 3/3] bpf: Move nf_conn extern declarations to filter.h
Posted by Daniel Xu 3 years, 6 months ago 
We're seeing the following new warnings on netdev/build_32bit and
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn CI jobs:

    ../net/core/filter.c:8608:1: warning: symbol
    'nf_conn_btf_access_lock' was not declared. Should it be static?
    ../net/core/filter.c:8611:5: warning: symbol 'nfct_bsa' was not
    declared. Should it be static?

Fix by ensuring extern declaration is present while compiling filter.o.

Fixes: 864b656f82cc ("bpf: Add support for writing to nf_conn:mark")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>
---
 include/linux/filter.h                   | 6 ++++++
 include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.h | 7 +------
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
index 75335432fcbc..98e28126c24b 100644
--- a/include/linux/filter.h
+++ b/include/linux/filter.h
@@ -567,6 +567,12 @@ struct sk_filter {
 
 DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(bpf_stats_enabled_key);
 
+extern struct mutex nf_conn_btf_access_lock;
+extern int (*nfct_btf_struct_access)(struct bpf_verifier_log *log, const struct btf *btf,
+				     const struct btf_type *t, int off, int size,
+				     enum bpf_access_type atype, u32 *next_btf_id,
+				     enum bpf_type_flag *flag);
+
 typedef unsigned int (*bpf_dispatcher_fn)(const void *ctx,
 					  const struct bpf_insn *insnsi,
 					  unsigned int (*bpf_func)(const void *,
diff --git a/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.h b/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.h
index d1087e4da440..24d1ccc1f8df 100644
--- a/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.h
+++ b/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.h
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
 
 #include <linux/bpf.h>
 #include <linux/btf.h>
+#include <linux/filter.h>
 #include <linux/kconfig.h>
 #include <linux/mutex.h>
 
@@ -14,12 +15,6 @@
 extern int register_nf_conntrack_bpf(void);
 extern void cleanup_nf_conntrack_bpf(void);
 
-extern struct mutex nf_conn_btf_access_lock;
-extern int (*nfct_btf_struct_access)(struct bpf_verifier_log *log, const struct btf *btf,
-				     const struct btf_type *t, int off, int size,
-				     enum bpf_access_type atype, u32 *next_btf_id,
-				     enum bpf_type_flag *flag);
-
 #else
 
 static inline int register_nf_conntrack_bpf(void)
-- 
2.37.1
Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/3] bpf: Move nf_conn extern declarations to filter.h
Posted by Martin KaFai Lau 3 years, 6 months ago 
On 9/19/22 12:44 PM, Daniel Xu wrote:
> We're seeing the following new warnings on netdev/build_32bit and
> netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn CI jobs:
> 
>      ../net/core/filter.c:8608:1: warning: symbol
>      'nf_conn_btf_access_lock' was not declared. Should it be static?
>      ../net/core/filter.c:8611:5: warning: symbol 'nfct_bsa' was not
>      declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Fix by ensuring extern declaration is present while compiling filter.o.
> 
> Fixes: 864b656f82cc ("bpf: Add support for writing to nf_conn:mark")
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>
> ---
>   include/linux/filter.h                   | 6 ++++++
>   include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.h | 7 +------
>   2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
> index 75335432fcbc..98e28126c24b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/filter.h
> +++ b/include/linux/filter.h
> @@ -567,6 +567,12 @@ struct sk_filter {
>   
>   DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(bpf_stats_enabled_key);
>   
> +extern struct mutex nf_conn_btf_access_lock;
> +extern int (*nfct_btf_struct_access)(struct bpf_verifier_log *log, const struct btf *btf,
> +				     const struct btf_type *t, int off, int size,
> +				     enum bpf_access_type atype, u32 *next_btf_id,
> +				     enum bpf_type_flag *flag);
> +
>   typedef unsigned int (*bpf_dispatcher_fn)(const void *ctx,
>   					  const struct bpf_insn *insnsi,
>   					  unsigned int (*bpf_func)(const void *,
> diff --git a/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.h b/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.h
> index d1087e4da440..24d1ccc1f8df 100644
> --- a/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.h
> +++ b/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.h
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
>   
>   #include <linux/bpf.h>
>   #include <linux/btf.h>
> +#include <linux/filter.h>

The filter.h is only needed by nf_conntrack_bpf.c?  How about moving 
this include to nf_conntrack_bpf.c.  nf_conntrack_bpf.h is included by 
other conntrack core codes.  I would prefer not to spill over 
unnecessary bpf headers to them.  The same goes for the above bpf.h and 
btf.h which are only needed in nf_conntrack_bpf.c also?

>   #include <linux/kconfig.h>
>   #include <linux/mutex.h>

Also, is mutex.h still needed?

>   
> @@ -14,12 +15,6 @@
>   extern int register_nf_conntrack_bpf(void);
>   extern void cleanup_nf_conntrack_bpf(void);
>   
> -extern struct mutex nf_conn_btf_access_lock;
> -extern int (*nfct_btf_struct_access)(struct bpf_verifier_log *log, const struct btf *btf,
> -				     const struct btf_type *t, int off, int size,
> -				     enum bpf_access_type atype, u32 *next_btf_id,
> -				     enum bpf_type_flag *flag);
> -
>   #else
>   
>   static inline int register_nf_conntrack_bpf(void)
Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/3] bpf: Move nf_conn extern declarations to filter.h
Posted by Daniel Xu 3 years, 6 months ago 
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 10:20:47PM -0700, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> On 9/19/22 12:44 PM, Daniel Xu wrote:
> > We're seeing the following new warnings on netdev/build_32bit and
> > netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn CI jobs:
> > 
> >      ../net/core/filter.c:8608:1: warning: symbol
> >      'nf_conn_btf_access_lock' was not declared. Should it be static?
> >      ../net/core/filter.c:8611:5: warning: symbol 'nfct_bsa' was not
> >      declared. Should it be static?
> > 
> > Fix by ensuring extern declaration is present while compiling filter.o.
> > 
> > Fixes: 864b656f82cc ("bpf: Add support for writing to nf_conn:mark")
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>
> > ---
> >   include/linux/filter.h                   | 6 ++++++
> >   include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.h | 7 +------
> >   2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
> > index 75335432fcbc..98e28126c24b 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/filter.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/filter.h
> > @@ -567,6 +567,12 @@ struct sk_filter {
> >   DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(bpf_stats_enabled_key);
> > +extern struct mutex nf_conn_btf_access_lock;
> > +extern int (*nfct_btf_struct_access)(struct bpf_verifier_log *log, const struct btf *btf,
> > +				     const struct btf_type *t, int off, int size,
> > +				     enum bpf_access_type atype, u32 *next_btf_id,
> > +				     enum bpf_type_flag *flag);
> > +
> >   typedef unsigned int (*bpf_dispatcher_fn)(const void *ctx,
> >   					  const struct bpf_insn *insnsi,
> >   					  unsigned int (*bpf_func)(const void *,
> > diff --git a/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.h b/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.h
> > index d1087e4da440..24d1ccc1f8df 100644
> > --- a/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.h
> > +++ b/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.h
> > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
> >   #include <linux/bpf.h>
> >   #include <linux/btf.h>
> > +#include <linux/filter.h>
> 
> The filter.h is only needed by nf_conntrack_bpf.c?  How about moving this
> include to nf_conntrack_bpf.c.  nf_conntrack_bpf.h is included by other
> conntrack core codes.  I would prefer not to spill over unnecessary bpf
> headers to them.  The same goes for the above bpf.h and btf.h which are only
> needed in nf_conntrack_bpf.c also?

Ah yeah. Thanks for catching. Will send out a v3.

Now I'm wondering if https://include-what-you-use.org/ would work with
kernel source. Might give it a try later.

> 
> >   #include <linux/kconfig.h>
> >   #include <linux/mutex.h>
> 
> Also, is mutex.h still needed?

Nope. But forgot to send that out in v3. I'll roll it into v4 if we need
another respin or otherwise I'll send out a separate patch after.

> 
> > @@ -14,12 +15,6 @@
> >   extern int register_nf_conntrack_bpf(void);
> >   extern void cleanup_nf_conntrack_bpf(void);
> > -extern struct mutex nf_conn_btf_access_lock;
> > -extern int (*nfct_btf_struct_access)(struct bpf_verifier_log *log, const struct btf *btf,
> > -				     const struct btf_type *t, int off, int size,
> > -				     enum bpf_access_type atype, u32 *next_btf_id,
> > -				     enum bpf_type_flag *flag);
> > -
> >   #else
> >   static inline int register_nf_conntrack_bpf(void)
>

Patchew 2.1-devel-ea86937

© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.