>On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 11:15:56AM +0800, javen wrote:
>> From: Javen Xu <javen_xu@realsil.com.cn>
>>
>> This patch series adds RSS (Receive Side Scaling) support for the
>> r8169 ethernet driver, specifically for RTL8127 (RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_80).
>>
>> RSS enables packet distribution across multiple receive queues, which
>> can significantly improve network throughput on multi-core systems by
>> allowing parallel processing of incoming packets.
>
>...
>
>Hi Javen,
>
>There are AI generated reviews of this patchset available on bogh
>https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/ and https://sashiko.dev
>
>I would appreciate it if you could look over them and address any issues that
>effect the functionality of your patchset. I do not suggest expanding the scope
>of this patchset, but rather treating other issues in the context of possible
>follow-up.

Hi,

r8169_main.c used request_irq() before, but I was suggested to use pci_request_irq() to generate the name for each irq dynamically. And I find that in pci_request_irq(), irqflags is fixed to IRQF_SHARED. So I want to know how can I handle with this situation?

Thanks,
BRs,
Javen

On Mon, May 25, 2026 at 07:15:23AM +0000, Javen wrote:
> >On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 11:15:56AM +0800, javen wrote:
> >> From: Javen Xu <javen_xu@realsil.com.cn>
> >>
> >> This patch series adds RSS (Receive Side Scaling) support for the
> >> r8169 ethernet driver, specifically for RTL8127 (RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_80).
> >>
> >> RSS enables packet distribution across multiple receive queues, which
> >> can significantly improve network throughput on multi-core systems by
> >> allowing parallel processing of incoming packets.
> >
> >...
> >
> >Hi Javen,
> >
> >There are AI generated reviews of this patchset available on bogh
> >https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/ and https://sashiko.dev
> >
> >I would appreciate it if you could look over them and address any issues that
> >effect the functionality of your patchset. I do not suggest expanding the scope
> >of this patchset, but rather treating other issues in the context of possible
> >follow-up.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> r8169_main.c used request_irq() before, but I was suggested to use pci_request_irq() to generate the name for each irq dynamically. And I find that in pci_request_irq(), irqflags is fixed to IRQF_SHARED. So I want to know how can I handle with this situation?

I am unsure. But if that is the advice you received then I would suggest
sticking with it.