scripts/checkpatch.pl | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
On Fri, 2022-09-30 at 14:22 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 12:56:31PM -0700, Elliot Berman wrote:
> > Gunyah resource manager defines a simple API for virtual machine log
> > sharing with the console service.
[]
> > diff --git a/include/linux/gunyah_rsc_mgr.h b/include/linux/gunyah_rsc_mgr.h
[]
> > +struct gh_rm_notif_vm_console_chars {
> > + u16 vmid;
> > + u16 num_bytes;
> > + u8 bytes[0];
>
> Please do not use [0] for new structures, otherwise we will just have to
> fix them up again as we are trying to get rid of all of these from the
> kernel. Just use "bytes[];" instead.
Maybe a checkpatch addition like:
---
scripts/checkpatch.pl | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 2737e4ced5745..187ed84c1f80a 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -3948,6 +3948,17 @@ sub process {
}
}
+# check for zero length array declarations in likely structs
+ if ($line =~ /^\+\t($Declare\s*$Ident)\s*\[\s*0\s*\]\s*;\s*$/ &&
+ defined $lines[$linenr] &&
+ $lines[$linenr] =~ /^[\+ ]\}\s*(?:__\w+\s*(?:$balanced_parens)?)\s*;\s*$/) {
+ if (WARN("FLEXIBLE_ARRAY_ZERO",
+ "Prefer flexible length array declarations with [] over [0]\n" . $herecurr) &&
+ $fix) {
+ $fixed[$fixlinenr] =~ s/\[\s*0\s*\]/[]/;
+ }
+ }
+
# check for multiple consecutive blank lines
if ($prevline =~ /^[\+ ]\s*$/ &&
$line =~ /^\+\s*$/ &&
On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 06:46:30PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-09-30 at 14:22 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 12:56:31PM -0700, Elliot Berman wrote:
> > > Gunyah resource manager defines a simple API for virtual machine log
> > > sharing with the console service.
> []
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/gunyah_rsc_mgr.h b/include/linux/gunyah_rsc_mgr.h
> []
> > > +struct gh_rm_notif_vm_console_chars {
> > > + u16 vmid;
> > > + u16 num_bytes;
> > > + u8 bytes[0];
> >
> > Please do not use [0] for new structures, otherwise we will just have to
> > fix them up again as we are trying to get rid of all of these from the
> > kernel. Just use "bytes[];" instead.
>
> Maybe a checkpatch addition like:
> ---
> scripts/checkpatch.pl | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> index 2737e4ced5745..187ed84c1f80a 100755
> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -3948,6 +3948,17 @@ sub process {
> }
> }
>
> +# check for zero length array declarations in likely structs
> + if ($line =~ /^\+\t($Declare\s*$Ident)\s*\[\s*0\s*\]\s*;\s*$/ &&
> + defined $lines[$linenr] &&
> + $lines[$linenr] =~ /^[\+ ]\}\s*(?:__\w+\s*(?:$balanced_parens)?)\s*;\s*$/) {
> + if (WARN("FLEXIBLE_ARRAY_ZERO",
> + "Prefer flexible length array declarations with [] over [0]\n" . $herecurr) &&
> + $fix) {
> + $fixed[$fixlinenr] =~ s/\[\s*0\s*\]/[]/;
> + }
> + }
> +
> # check for multiple consecutive blank lines
> if ($prevline =~ /^[\+ ]\s*$/ &&
> $line =~ /^\+\s*$/ &&
This is a question for Gustavo, who did all the work here. Gustavo,
does the above checkpatch change look good to you?
thanks,
greg k-h
On Mon, 2022-10-03 at 07:29 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 06:46:30PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Fri, 2022-09-30 at 14:22 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 12:56:31PM -0700, Elliot Berman wrote:
> > > > Gunyah resource manager defines a simple API for virtual machine log
> > > > sharing with the console service.
> > []
> > > > diff --git a/include/linux/gunyah_rsc_mgr.h b/include/linux/gunyah_rsc_mgr.h
> > []
> > > > +struct gh_rm_notif_vm_console_chars {
> > > > + u16 vmid;
> > > > + u16 num_bytes;
> > > > + u8 bytes[0];
> > >
> > > Please do not use [0] for new structures, otherwise we will just have to
> > > fix them up again as we are trying to get rid of all of these from the
> > > kernel. Just use "bytes[];" instead.
> >
> > Maybe a checkpatch addition like:
> > ---
[]
> > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
[]
> > @@ -3948,6 +3948,17 @@ sub process {
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +# check for zero length array declarations in likely structs
> > + if ($line =~ /^\+\t($Declare\s*$Ident)\s*\[\s*0\s*\]\s*;\s*$/ &&
> > + defined $lines[$linenr] &&
> > + $lines[$linenr] =~ /^[\+ ]\}\s*(?:__\w+\s*(?:$balanced_parens)?)\s*;\s*$/) {
This should actually be:
$lines[$linenr] =~ /^[\+ ]\}(?:\s*__\w+\s*(?:$balanced_parens)?)*\s*;\s*$/) {
as it was missing a * for uses like
int foo[0];
} __packed __aligned(4);
and uses without any attribute at all
> > + if (WARN("FLEXIBLE_ARRAY_ZERO",
> > + "Prefer flexible length array declarations with [] over [0]\n" . $herecurr) &&
> > + $fix) {
> > + $fixed[$fixlinenr] =~ s/\[\s*0\s*\]/[]/;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > # check for multiple consecutive blank lines
> > if ($prevline =~ /^[\+ ]\s*$/ &&
> > $line =~ /^\+\s*$/ &&
>
> This is a question for Gustavo, who did all the work here. Gustavo,
> does the above checkpatch change look good to you?
On 10/3/22 00:38, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-10-03 at 07:29 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 06:46:30PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2022-09-30 at 14:22 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 12:56:31PM -0700, Elliot Berman wrote:
>>>>> Gunyah resource manager defines a simple API for virtual machine log
>>>>> sharing with the console service.
>>> []
>>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/gunyah_rsc_mgr.h b/include/linux/gunyah_rsc_mgr.h
>>> []
>>>>> +struct gh_rm_notif_vm_console_chars {
>>>>> + u16 vmid;
>>>>> + u16 num_bytes;
>>>>> + u8 bytes[0];
>>>>
>>>> Please do not use [0] for new structures, otherwise we will just have to
>>>> fix them up again as we are trying to get rid of all of these from the
>>>> kernel. Just use "bytes[];" instead.
>>>
>>> Maybe a checkpatch addition like:
>>> ---
> []
>>> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> []
>>> @@ -3948,6 +3948,17 @@ sub process {
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> +# check for zero length array declarations in likely structs
>>> + if ($line =~ /^\+\t($Declare\s*$Ident)\s*\[\s*0\s*\]\s*;\s*$/ &&
>>> + defined $lines[$linenr] &&
>>> + $lines[$linenr] =~ /^[\+ ]\}\s*(?:__\w+\s*(?:$balanced_parens)?)\s*;\s*$/) {
This sounds great. We need the same for one-element arrays. :)
Both zero-length and one-element arrays are deprecated.
>
> This should actually be:
>
> $lines[$linenr] =~ /^[\+ ]\}(?:\s*__\w+\s*(?:$balanced_parens)?)*\s*;\s*$/) {
I agree. Thanks.
>
> as it was missing a * for uses like
>
> int foo[0];
> } __packed __aligned(4);
>
> and uses without any attribute at all
>
>>> + if (WARN("FLEXIBLE_ARRAY_ZERO",
>>> + "Prefer flexible length array declarations with [] over [0]\n" . $herecurr) &&
>>> + $fix) {
>>> + $fixed[$fixlinenr] =~ s/\[\s*0\s*\]/[]/;
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> # check for multiple consecutive blank lines
>>> if ($prevline =~ /^[\+ ]\s*$/ &&
>>> $line =~ /^\+\s*$/ &&
>>
>> This is a question for Gustavo, who did all the work here. Gustavo,
>> does the above checkpatch change look good to you?
Yep; the idea is great. :)
Another alternative to stop those fake flex-arrays from entering the codebase
is to run Coccinelle scripts during linux-next builds, as suggested by Elena
Reshetova at LSSEU a couple of months ago.
However, if these can be stopped with checkpatch it'd be really helpful, as well.
Thanks
--
Gustavo
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.