mm/memory_hotplug.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
The "reason" variable is uninitialized on this error path. It's supposed
to explain why the function failed.
Fixes: e4e2806b639c ("mm,memory_hotplug: implement numa node notifier")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
---
v2: I misunderstood the reason why the function was failing. Use the
correct reason.
mm/memory_hotplug.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
index 4d864b4fb891..e4009a44f883 100644
--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
+++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
@@ -1977,8 +1977,10 @@ int offline_pages(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
node_arg.nid = node;
ret = node_notify(NODE_REMOVING_LAST_MEMORY, &node_arg);
ret = notifier_to_errno(ret);
- if (ret)
+ if (ret) {
+ reason = "node notifier failure";
goto failed_removal_isolated;
+ }
}
ret = memory_notify(MEM_GOING_OFFLINE, &mem_arg);
--
2.47.2
On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 10:32:04AM -0500, Dan Carpenter wrote: > The "reason" variable is uninitialized on this error path. It's supposed > to explain why the function failed. > > Fixes: e4e2806b639c ("mm,memory_hotplug: implement numa node notifier") > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> Thanks Dan! Acked-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Although.. we might be in time to squash it, right? -- Oscar Salvador SUSE Labs
On 25.06.25 17:32, Dan Carpenter wrote: > The "reason" variable is uninitialized on this error path. It's supposed > to explain why the function failed. > > Fixes: e4e2806b639c ("mm,memory_hotplug: implement numa node notifier") > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> > --- > v2: I misunderstood the reason why the function was failing. Use the > correct reason. > > mm/memory_hotplug.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c > index 4d864b4fb891..e4009a44f883 100644 > --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c > +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c > @@ -1977,8 +1977,10 @@ int offline_pages(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages, > node_arg.nid = node; > ret = node_notify(NODE_REMOVING_LAST_MEMORY, &node_arg); > ret = notifier_to_errno(ret); > - if (ret) > + if (ret) { > + reason = "node notifier failure"; > goto failed_removal_isolated; > + } > } > > ret = memory_notify(MEM_GOING_OFFLINE, &mem_arg); Again, likely to be squashed :) Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> -- Cheers, David / dhildenb
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.