linux-next: build failure after merge of the fs-next tree

Mark Brown posted 1 patch 1 month ago
There is a newer version of this series
linux-next: build failure after merge of the fs-next tree
Posted by Mark Brown 1 month ago
Hi all,

After merging the fs-next tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:

/tmp/next/build/fs/ntfs/file.c: In function 'ntfs_file_mmap_prepare':
/tmp/next/build/fs/ntfs/file.c:657:13: error: implicit declaration of function 'vma_desc_test_flags'; did you mean 'vma_desc_set_flags'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
  657 |         if (vma_desc_test_flags(desc, VMA_WRITE_BIT)) {
      |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |             vma_desc_set_flags

Caused by an interaction with commit:

  2c3b5ea7028fa (mm: reintroduce vma_desc_test() as a singular flag test)

from one of the mm trees, I've fixed it up as below and can carry as
needed.

commit 8cbd256f4ac9d0b08b6fc30b305cfcb51b9de9f7
Author: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon Mar 9 13:24:55 2026 +0000

    ntfs: Fix up mm merge
    
    /tmp/next/build/fs/ntfs/file.c: In function 'ntfs_file_mmap_prepare':
    /tmp/next/build/fs/ntfs/file.c:657:13: error: implicit declaration of function 'vma_desc_test_flags'; did you mean 'vma_desc_set_flags'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
      657 |         if (vma_desc_test_flags(desc, VMA_WRITE_BIT)) {
          |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    
    Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

diff --git a/fs/ntfs/file.c b/fs/ntfs/file.c
index 2735780159999..e5b897a6c1e15 100644
--- a/fs/ntfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/ntfs/file.c
@@ -654,7 +654,7 @@ static int ntfs_file_mmap_prepare(struct vm_area_desc *desc)
 	if (NInoCompressed(NTFS_I(inode)))
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
-	if (vma_desc_test_flags(desc, VMA_WRITE_BIT)) {
+	if (vma_desc_test(desc, VMA_WRITE_BIT)) {
 		struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
 		loff_t from, to;
 		int err;
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the fs-next tree
Posted by Namjae Jeon 1 month ago
On Mon, Mar 9, 2026 at 11:29 PM Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
Hi Mark,
>
> After merging the fs-next tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> /tmp/next/build/fs/ntfs/file.c: In function 'ntfs_file_mmap_prepare':
> /tmp/next/build/fs/ntfs/file.c:657:13: error: implicit declaration of function 'vma_desc_test_flags'; did you mean 'vma_desc_set_flags'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>   657 |         if (vma_desc_test_flags(desc, VMA_WRITE_BIT)) {
>       |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>       |             vma_desc_set_flags
>
> Caused by an interaction with commit:
>
>   2c3b5ea7028fa (mm: reintroduce vma_desc_test() as a singular flag test)
>
> from one of the mm trees, I've fixed it up as below and can carry as
> needed.
>
> commit 8cbd256f4ac9d0b08b6fc30b305cfcb51b9de9f7
> Author: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> Date:   Mon Mar 9 13:24:55 2026 +0000
>
>     ntfs: Fix up mm merge
>
>     /tmp/next/build/fs/ntfs/file.c: In function 'ntfs_file_mmap_prepare':
>     /tmp/next/build/fs/ntfs/file.c:657:13: error: implicit declaration of function 'vma_desc_test_flags'; did you mean 'vma_desc_set_flags'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>       657 |         if (vma_desc_test_flags(desc, VMA_WRITE_BIT)) {
>           |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>     Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
>
> diff --git a/fs/ntfs/file.c b/fs/ntfs/file.c
> index 2735780159999..e5b897a6c1e15 100644
> --- a/fs/ntfs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/ntfs/file.c
> @@ -654,7 +654,7 @@ static int ntfs_file_mmap_prepare(struct vm_area_desc *desc)
>         if (NInoCompressed(NTFS_I(inode)))
>                 return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> -       if (vma_desc_test_flags(desc, VMA_WRITE_BIT)) {
> +       if (vma_desc_test(desc, VMA_WRITE_BIT)) {
>                 struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
>                 loff_t from, to;
>                 int err;
Looks good to me:)
Thanks for fixing it up and carrying the patch!
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the fs-next tree
Posted by Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle) 1 month ago
On Tue, Mar 10, 2026 at 08:08:22AM +0900, Namjae Jeon wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2026 at 11:29 PM Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> Hi Mark,
> >
> > After merging the fs-next tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > /tmp/next/build/fs/ntfs/file.c: In function 'ntfs_file_mmap_prepare':
> > /tmp/next/build/fs/ntfs/file.c:657:13: error: implicit declaration of function 'vma_desc_test_flags'; did you mean 'vma_desc_set_flags'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> >   657 |         if (vma_desc_test_flags(desc, VMA_WRITE_BIT)) {
> >       |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >       |             vma_desc_set_flags
> >
> > Caused by an interaction with commit:
> >
> >   2c3b5ea7028fa (mm: reintroduce vma_desc_test() as a singular flag test)
> >
> > from one of the mm trees, I've fixed it up as below and can carry as
> > needed.
> >
> > commit 8cbd256f4ac9d0b08b6fc30b305cfcb51b9de9f7
> > Author: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> > Date:   Mon Mar 9 13:24:55 2026 +0000
> >
> >     ntfs: Fix up mm merge
> >
> >     /tmp/next/build/fs/ntfs/file.c: In function 'ntfs_file_mmap_prepare':
> >     /tmp/next/build/fs/ntfs/file.c:657:13: error: implicit declaration of function 'vma_desc_test_flags'; did you mean 'vma_desc_set_flags'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> >       657 |         if (vma_desc_test_flags(desc, VMA_WRITE_BIT)) {
> >           |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> >     Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/ntfs/file.c b/fs/ntfs/file.c
> > index 2735780159999..e5b897a6c1e15 100644
> > --- a/fs/ntfs/file.c
> > +++ b/fs/ntfs/file.c
> > @@ -654,7 +654,7 @@ static int ntfs_file_mmap_prepare(struct vm_area_desc *desc)
> >         if (NInoCompressed(NTFS_I(inode)))
> >                 return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >
> > -       if (vma_desc_test_flags(desc, VMA_WRITE_BIT)) {
> > +       if (vma_desc_test(desc, VMA_WRITE_BIT)) {
> >                 struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
> >                 loff_t from, to;
> >                 int err;
> Looks good to me:)
> Thanks for fixing it up and carrying the patch!

Me too, thanks guys, and sorry for the noise!

Cheers, Lorenzo