[PATCH next] iio: imu: inv_icm45600: Add a missing return statement in probe()

Dan Carpenter posted 1 patch 3 months, 2 weeks ago
drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm45600/inv_icm45600_i3c.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
[PATCH next] iio: imu: inv_icm45600: Add a missing return statement in probe()
Posted by Dan Carpenter 3 months, 2 weeks ago
The intention here was clearly to return -ENODEV but the return statement
was missing.  It would result in an off by one read in i3c_chip_info[] on
the next line.  Add the return statement.

Fixes: 1bef24e9007e ("iio: imu: inv_icm45600: add I3C driver for inv_icm45600 driver")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm45600/inv_icm45600_i3c.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm45600/inv_icm45600_i3c.c b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm45600/inv_icm45600_i3c.c
index b5df06b97d44..9247eae9b3e2 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm45600/inv_icm45600_i3c.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm45600/inv_icm45600_i3c.c
@@ -57,7 +57,8 @@ static int inv_icm45600_i3c_probe(struct i3c_device *i3cdev)
 	}
 
 	if (chip == nb_chip)
-		dev_err_probe(&i3cdev->dev, -ENODEV, "Failed to match part id %d\n", whoami);
+		return dev_err_probe(&i3cdev->dev, -ENODEV,
+				     "Failed to match part id %d\n", whoami);
 
 	return inv_icm45600_core_probe(regmap, i3c_chip_info[chip], false, NULL);
 }
-- 
2.51.0
Re: [PATCH next] iio: imu: inv_icm45600: Add a missing return statement in probe()
Posted by Jonathan Cameron 3 months, 1 week ago
On Wed, 22 Oct 2025 14:02:20 +0300
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> wrote:

> The intention here was clearly to return -ENODEV but the return statement
> was missing.  It would result in an off by one read in i3c_chip_info[] on
> the next line.  Add the return statement.
> 
> Fixes: 1bef24e9007e ("iio: imu: inv_icm45600: add I3C driver for inv_icm45600 driver")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm45600/inv_icm45600_i3c.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm45600/inv_icm45600_i3c.c b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm45600/inv_icm45600_i3c.c
> index b5df06b97d44..9247eae9b3e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm45600/inv_icm45600_i3c.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm45600/inv_icm45600_i3c.c
> @@ -57,7 +57,8 @@ static int inv_icm45600_i3c_probe(struct i3c_device *i3cdev)
>  	}
>  
>  	if (chip == nb_chip)
> -		dev_err_probe(&i3cdev->dev, -ENODEV, "Failed to match part id %d\n", whoami);
> +		return dev_err_probe(&i3cdev->dev, -ENODEV,
> +				     "Failed to match part id %d\n", whoami);
>  
>  	return inv_icm45600_core_probe(regmap, i3c_chip_info[chip], false, NULL);
>  }

I'm going to apply this but the resulting code is still wrong (even if not
a true bug after this fix).

A hard ID match like this breaks use of dt fallback compatibles.
What this should do is 'give it a go' on matching, but if there no match it should
carry on as if the match was to whatever the compatible that was supplied was.
When that happens a dev_info() is appropriate but not error out as this does.

Remi, if possible could you look at adding such a patch on top of this?

Thanks,

Jonathan
Re: [PATCH next] iio: imu: inv_icm45600: Add a missing return statement in probe()
Posted by David Lechner 3 months, 2 weeks ago
On 10/22/25 6:02 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> The intention here was clearly to return -ENODEV but the return statement
> was missing.  It would result in an off by one read in i3c_chip_info[] on
> the next line.  Add the return statement.
> 
> Fixes: 1bef24e9007e ("iio: imu: inv_icm45600: add I3C driver for inv_icm45600 driver")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
> ---

Reviewed-by: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>