linux-next: manual merge of the bitmap tree with the tip tree

Mark Brown posted 1 patch 2 weeks, 2 days ago
linux-next: manual merge of the bitmap tree with the tip tree
Posted by Mark Brown 2 weeks, 2 days ago
Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the bitmap tree got a conflict in:

  rust/helpers/helpers.c

between commit:

  ed17707bd8f33 ("rust: sync: Add memory barriers")

from the tip tree and commits:

  ae384a4623fc3 ("rust: add bindings for bitops.h")
  78d9de4ca3474 ("rust: add bindings for bitmap.h")

from the bitmap tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

diff --cc rust/helpers/helpers.c
index a16758a6ef395,abff1ef14d813..0000000000000
--- a/rust/helpers/helpers.c
+++ b/rust/helpers/helpers.c
@@@ -8,7 -8,8 +8,9 @@@
   */
  
  #include "auxiliary.c"
 +#include "barrier.c"
+ #include "bitmap.c"
+ #include "bitops.c"
  #include "blk.c"
  #include "bug.c"
  #include "build_assert.c"
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bitmap tree with the tip tree
Posted by Boqun Feng 2 weeks, 2 days ago
[Cc Ingo, Thomas and Miguel for their awareness]

On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 11:56:37PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the bitmap tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   rust/helpers/helpers.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   ed17707bd8f33 ("rust: sync: Add memory barriers")
> 
> from the tip tree and commits:
> 
>   ae384a4623fc3 ("rust: add bindings for bitops.h")
>   78d9de4ca3474 ("rust: add bindings for bitmap.h")
> 

Thank you for reporting and your resolution looks good to me.

Regards,
Boqun

> from the bitmap tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> diff --cc rust/helpers/helpers.c
> index a16758a6ef395,abff1ef14d813..0000000000000
> --- a/rust/helpers/helpers.c
> +++ b/rust/helpers/helpers.c
> @@@ -8,7 -8,8 +8,9 @@@
>    */
>   
>   #include "auxiliary.c"
>  +#include "barrier.c"
> + #include "bitmap.c"
> + #include "bitops.c"
>   #include "blk.c"
>   #include "bug.c"
>   #include "build_assert.c"
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bitmap tree with the tip tree
Posted by Miguel Ojeda 2 weeks, 2 days ago
On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 1:43 AM Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> [Cc Ingo, Thomas and Miguel for their awareness]
>
> Thank you for reporting and your resolution looks good to me.

Thanks Boqun, looks good to me too.

Cheers,
Miguel