Commit 65e8202f0322 ("iio: Remove error prints for
devm_add_action_or_reset()") accidentally introduce a bug where we
returned "ret" but the error code was stored in "error" if
devm_add_action_or_reset() failed.  Using two variables to store error
codes is unnecessary and confusing.  Delete the "error" variable and use
"ret" everywhere instead.

Fixes: 65e8202f0322 ("iio: Remove error prints for devm_add_action_or_reset()")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/iio/proximity/vl53l0x-i2c.c | 11 +++++------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iio/proximity/vl53l0x-i2c.c b/drivers/iio/proximity/vl53l0x-i2c.c
index 696340ec027a..ad3e46d47fa8 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/proximity/vl53l0x-i2c.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/proximity/vl53l0x-i2c.c
@@ -311,7 +311,6 @@ static int vl53l0x_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
 {
 	struct vl53l0x_data *data;
 	struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
-	int error;
 	int ret;
 
 	indio_dev = devm_iio_device_alloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*data));
@@ -344,13 +343,13 @@ static int vl53l0x_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
 		return dev_err_probe(&client->dev, PTR_ERR(data->reset_gpio),
 				     "Cannot get reset GPIO\n");
 
-	error = vl53l0x_power_on(data);
-	if (error)
-		return dev_err_probe(&client->dev, error,
+	ret = vl53l0x_power_on(data);
+	if (ret)
+		return dev_err_probe(&client->dev, ret,
 				     "Failed to power on the chip\n");
 
-	error = devm_add_action_or_reset(&client->dev, vl53l0x_power_off, data);
-	if (error)
+	ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&client->dev, vl53l0x_power_off, data);
+	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
 	indio_dev->name = "vl53l0x";
-- 
2.47.2

On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 12:39 PM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Commit 65e8202f0322 ("iio: Remove error prints for
> devm_add_action_or_reset()") accidentally introduce a bug where we

introduced

> returned "ret" but the error code was stored in "error" if
> devm_add_action_or_reset() failed.  Using two variables to store error
> codes is unnecessary and confusing.  Delete the "error" variable and use
> "ret" everywhere instead.

Agree, this is a good catch!
But please, fix the Subject to start with "iio:".

With the above comments being addressed
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 01:18:35PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 12:39 PM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > Commit 65e8202f0322 ("iio: Remove error prints for
> > devm_add_action_or_reset()") accidentally introduce a bug where we
> 
> introduced
> 
> > returned "ret" but the error code was stored in "error" if
> > devm_add_action_or_reset() failed.  Using two variables to store error
> > codes is unnecessary and confusing.  Delete the "error" variable and use
> > "ret" everywhere instead.
> 
> Agree, this is a good catch!
> But please, fix the Subject to start with "iio:".
> 
> With the above comments being addressed
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>

Yeah.  :(  Thanks.  Will do.

regards,
dan carpenter