fs/ocfs2/alloc.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
Smatch complains that checking "folios" for NULL doesn't make sense
because it has already been dereferenced at this point. Really passing a
NULL "folios" pointer to ocfs2_grab_folios() doesn't make sense, and
fortunately none of the callers do that. Delete the unnecessary NULL
check.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
---
fs/ocfs2/alloc.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
index 821cb7874685..162711cc5b20 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
@@ -6928,8 +6928,7 @@ static int ocfs2_grab_folios(struct inode *inode, loff_t start, loff_t end,
out:
if (ret != 0) {
- if (folios)
- ocfs2_unlock_and_free_folios(folios, numfolios);
+ ocfs2_unlock_and_free_folios(folios, numfolios);
numfolios = 0;
}
--
2.47.2
On 2025/8/19 17:41, Dan Carpenter wrote: > Smatch complains that checking "folios" for NULL doesn't make sense > because it has already been dereferenced at this point. Really passing a > NULL "folios" pointer to ocfs2_grab_folios() doesn't make sense, and > fortunately none of the callers do that. Delete the unnecessary NULL > check. > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> Acked-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> > --- > fs/ocfs2/alloc.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c > index 821cb7874685..162711cc5b20 100644 > --- a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c > +++ b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c > @@ -6928,8 +6928,7 @@ static int ocfs2_grab_folios(struct inode *inode, loff_t start, loff_t end, > > out: > if (ret != 0) { > - if (folios) > - ocfs2_unlock_and_free_folios(folios, numfolios); > + ocfs2_unlock_and_free_folios(folios, numfolios); > numfolios = 0; > } >
On 8/19/25 4:41 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote: > Smatch complains that checking "folios" for NULL doesn't make sense > because it has already been dereferenced at this point. Really passing a > NULL "folios" pointer to ocfs2_grab_folios() doesn't make sense, and > fortunately none of the callers do that. Delete the unnecessary NULL > check. > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> > --- > fs/ocfs2/alloc.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c > index 821cb7874685..162711cc5b20 100644 > --- a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c > +++ b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c > @@ -6928,8 +6928,7 @@ static int ocfs2_grab_folios(struct inode *inode, loff_t start, loff_t end, > > out: > if (ret != 0) { > - if (folios) > - ocfs2_unlock_and_free_folios(folios, numfolios); > + ocfs2_unlock_and_free_folios(folios, numfolios); > numfolios = 0; > } > Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely <mark.tinguely@oracle.com>
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.