drivers/bcma/host_pci.c | 38 +++++++++++++------------------------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
Replace pci_* with pcim_* and kzalloc() with devm_kzalloc() so that no
need to worry about freeing resources and disabling the device.
Signed-off-by: Salah Triki <salah.triki@gmail.com>
---
Changes in v2:
-Delete the inclusion of serdev.h since it is not needed
drivers/bcma/host_pci.c | 38 +++++++++++++-------------------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/bcma/host_pci.c b/drivers/bcma/host_pci.c
index 960632197b05..8cdb546ce697 100644
--- a/drivers/bcma/host_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/bcma/host_pci.c
@@ -161,22 +161,23 @@ static int bcma_host_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *dev,
const struct pci_device_id *id)
{
struct bcma_bus *bus;
- int err = -ENOMEM;
+ int err;
u32 val;
/* Alloc */
- bus = kzalloc(sizeof(*bus), GFP_KERNEL);
+ bus = devm_kzalloc(&dev->dev, sizeof(*bus), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!bus)
- goto out;
+ return -ENOMEM;
/* Basic PCI configuration */
- err = pci_enable_device(dev);
+ err = pcim_enable_device(dev);
if (err)
- goto err_kfree_bus;
+ return err;
- err = pci_request_regions(dev, "bcma-pci-bridge");
+ err = pcim_request_all_regions(dev, "bcma-pci-bridge");
if (err)
- goto err_pci_disable;
+ return err;
+
pci_set_master(dev);
/* Disable the RETRY_TIMEOUT register (0x41) to keep
@@ -188,17 +189,16 @@ static int bcma_host_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *dev,
/* SSB needed additional powering up, do we have any AMBA PCI cards? */
if (!pci_is_pcie(dev)) {
bcma_err(bus, "PCI card detected, they are not supported.\n");
- err = -ENXIO;
- goto err_pci_release_regions;
+ return -ENXIO;
}
bus->dev = &dev->dev;
/* Map MMIO */
err = -ENOMEM;
- bus->mmio = pci_iomap(dev, 0, ~0UL);
+ bus->mmio = pcim_iomap(dev, 0, ~0UL);
if (!bus->mmio)
- goto err_pci_release_regions;
+ return err;
/* Host specific */
bus->host_pci = dev;
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ static int bcma_host_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *dev,
/* Scan bus to find out generation of PCIe core */
err = bcma_bus_scan(bus);
if (err)
- goto err_pci_unmap_mmio;
+ return err;
if (bcma_find_core(bus, BCMA_CORE_PCIE2))
bus->host_is_pcie2 = true;
@@ -226,19 +226,11 @@ static int bcma_host_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *dev,
pci_set_drvdata(dev, bus);
-out:
return err;
err_unregister_cores:
bcma_unregister_cores(bus);
-err_pci_unmap_mmio:
- pci_iounmap(dev, bus->mmio);
-err_pci_release_regions:
- pci_release_regions(dev);
-err_pci_disable:
- pci_disable_device(dev);
-err_kfree_bus:
- kfree(bus);
+
return err;
}
@@ -247,10 +239,6 @@ static void bcma_host_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *dev)
struct bcma_bus *bus = pci_get_drvdata(dev);
bcma_bus_unregister(bus);
- pci_iounmap(dev, bus->mmio);
- pci_release_regions(dev);
- pci_disable_device(dev);
- kfree(bus);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
--
2.43.0
On Sat, 2025-07-19 at 16:52 +0100, Salah Triki wrote: > Replace pci_* with pcim_* and kzalloc() with devm_kzalloc() so that no > need to worry about freeing resources and disabling the device. > Please mention how you tested this? :) johannes
Replace pci_* with pcim_* and kzalloc() with devm_kzalloc() so that no
need to worry about freeing resources and disabling the device.
Signed-off-by: Salah Triki <salah.triki@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Compile only
---
Changes in v3:
-Add the tag Tested-by
Changes in v2:
-Delete the inclusion of serdev.h since it is not needed
drivers/bcma/host_pci.c | 38 +++++++++++++-------------------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/bcma/host_pci.c b/drivers/bcma/host_pci.c
index 960632197b05..8cdb546ce697 100644
--- a/drivers/bcma/host_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/bcma/host_pci.c
@@ -161,22 +161,23 @@ static int bcma_host_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *dev,
const struct pci_device_id *id)
{
struct bcma_bus *bus;
- int err = -ENOMEM;
+ int err;
u32 val;
/* Alloc */
- bus = kzalloc(sizeof(*bus), GFP_KERNEL);
+ bus = devm_kzalloc(&dev->dev, sizeof(*bus), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!bus)
- goto out;
+ return -ENOMEM;
/* Basic PCI configuration */
- err = pci_enable_device(dev);
+ err = pcim_enable_device(dev);
if (err)
- goto err_kfree_bus;
+ return err;
- err = pci_request_regions(dev, "bcma-pci-bridge");
+ err = pcim_request_all_regions(dev, "bcma-pci-bridge");
if (err)
- goto err_pci_disable;
+ return err;
+
pci_set_master(dev);
/* Disable the RETRY_TIMEOUT register (0x41) to keep
@@ -188,17 +189,16 @@ static int bcma_host_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *dev,
/* SSB needed additional powering up, do we have any AMBA PCI cards? */
if (!pci_is_pcie(dev)) {
bcma_err(bus, "PCI card detected, they are not supported.\n");
- err = -ENXIO;
- goto err_pci_release_regions;
+ return -ENXIO;
}
bus->dev = &dev->dev;
/* Map MMIO */
err = -ENOMEM;
- bus->mmio = pci_iomap(dev, 0, ~0UL);
+ bus->mmio = pcim_iomap(dev, 0, ~0UL);
if (!bus->mmio)
- goto err_pci_release_regions;
+ return err;
/* Host specific */
bus->host_pci = dev;
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ static int bcma_host_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *dev,
/* Scan bus to find out generation of PCIe core */
err = bcma_bus_scan(bus);
if (err)
- goto err_pci_unmap_mmio;
+ return err;
if (bcma_find_core(bus, BCMA_CORE_PCIE2))
bus->host_is_pcie2 = true;
@@ -226,19 +226,11 @@ static int bcma_host_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *dev,
pci_set_drvdata(dev, bus);
-out:
return err;
err_unregister_cores:
bcma_unregister_cores(bus);
-err_pci_unmap_mmio:
- pci_iounmap(dev, bus->mmio);
-err_pci_release_regions:
- pci_release_regions(dev);
-err_pci_disable:
- pci_disable_device(dev);
-err_kfree_bus:
- kfree(bus);
+
return err;
}
@@ -247,10 +239,6 @@ static void bcma_host_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *dev)
struct bcma_bus *bus = pci_get_drvdata(dev);
bcma_bus_unregister(bus);
- pci_iounmap(dev, bus->mmio);
- pci_release_regions(dev);
- pci_disable_device(dev);
- kfree(bus);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
--
2.43.0
On 7/19/2025 9:19 AM, Salah Triki wrote: > Replace pci_* with pcim_* and kzalloc() with devm_kzalloc() so that no > need to worry about freeing resources and disabling the device. > > Signed-off-by: Salah Triki <salah.triki@gmail.com> > Tested-by: Compile only 1) When you post a new version of a patch, please do NOT have it be In-Reply-To any previous messages. Each version of a patch should start a separate e-mail thread. The guidance at <https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#explicit-in-reply-to-headers> seems outdated. 2) Most maintainers will not accept patches which make such a big semantic change without actually testing the change on hardware.
On Sat, Jul 19, 2025 at 10:21:59AM -0700, Jeff Johnson wrote: > > 1) When you post a new version of a patch, please do NOT have it be > In-Reply-To any previous messages. Each version of a patch should start a > separate e-mail thread. The guidance at > <https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#explicit-in-reply-to-headers> > seems outdated. > > 2) Most maintainers will not accept patches which make such a big semantic > change without actually testing the change on hardware. Thanx for information Best regards, Salah Triki
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.