drivers/zorro/zorro-sysfs.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Reply-To:
replace sprintf() with sysfs_emit() in sysfs
*_show() functions in zorro-sysfs.c to follow the kernel's guidelines
from Documentation/filesystems/sysfs.rst.
This improves consistency, safety, and makes the code easier to
maintain and update in the future.
Signed-off-by: Rujra Bhatt <braker.noob.kernel@gmail.com>
---
drivers/zorro/zorro-sysfs.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/zorro/zorro-sysfs.c b/drivers/zorro/zorro-sysfs.c
index 10aedcd21363..a552724b7fc7 100644
--- a/drivers/zorro/zorro-sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/zorro/zorro-sysfs.c
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ static ssize_t name##_show(struct device *dev, \
struct zorro_dev *z; \
\
z = to_zorro_dev(dev); \
- return sprintf(buf, format_string, z->field); \
+ return sysfs_emit(buf, format_string, z->field); \
} \
static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(name);
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ static ssize_t serial_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
struct zorro_dev *z;
z = to_zorro_dev(dev);
- return sprintf(buf, "0x%08x\n", be32_to_cpu(z->rom.er_SerialNumber));
+ return sysfs_emit(buf, "0x%08x\n", be32_to_cpu(z->rom.er_SerialNumber));
}
static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(serial);
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ static ssize_t resource_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
{
struct zorro_dev *z = to_zorro_dev(dev);
- return sprintf(buf, "0x%08lx 0x%08lx 0x%08lx\n",
+ return sysfs_emit(buf, "0x%08lx 0x%08lx 0x%08lx\n",
(unsigned long)zorro_resource_start(z),
(unsigned long)zorro_resource_end(z),
zorro_resource_flags(z));
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ static ssize_t modalias_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
{
struct zorro_dev *z = to_zorro_dev(dev);
- return sprintf(buf, ZORRO_DEVICE_MODALIAS_FMT "\n", z->id);
+ return sysfs_emit(buf, ZORRO_DEVICE_MODALIAS_FMT "\n", z->id);
}
static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(modalias);
--
2.43.0
On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 09:09:08AM +0530, Rujra Bhatt wrote: > Reply-To: Why is this here? > > replace sprintf() with sysfs_emit() in sysfs > *_show() functions in zorro-sysfs.c to follow the kernel's guidelines > from Documentation/filesystems/sysfs.rst. > > This improves consistency, safety, and makes the code easier to > maintain and update in the future. No, not really. For new code, always use sysfs_emit(). For existing code, that you can not even test, just leave it alone unless you can prove it is wrong. This code looks fine as-is. No need to change it unless you really want to, but there is no requriement. thanks, greg k-h
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.