[PATCH 0/2] ASoC: tas5805m: Adjustments for tas5805m_i2c_probe()

Markus Elfring posted 2 patches 2 months, 2 weeks ago
sound/soc/codecs/tas5805m.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
[PATCH 0/2] ASoC: tas5805m: Adjustments for tas5805m_i2c_probe()
Posted by Markus Elfring 2 months, 2 weeks ago
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 10:30:10 +0200

A few update suggestions were taken into account
from static source code analysis.

Markus Elfring (2):
  Use scope-based resource management
  Improve a size determination

 sound/soc/codecs/tas5805m.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

--
2.46.0
Re: (subset) [PATCH 0/2] ASoC: tas5805m: Adjustments for tas5805m_i2c_probe()
Posted by Mark Brown 1 month, 4 weeks ago
On Mon, 16 Sep 2024 10:38:09 +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> A few update suggestions were taken into account
> from static source code analysis.
> 
> Markus Elfring (2):
>   Use scope-based resource management
>   Improve a size determination
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[2/2] ASoC: tas5805m: Improve a size determination in tas5805m_i2c_probe()
      commit: 0e9f73f109025f0d5d16b104b6684e6c03aa0c83

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark