drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
mt_set_mode() accepts 2 boolean switches indicating whether the device
(if it follows Windows Precision Touchpad specification) should report
hardware buttons and/or surface contacts. For a casual reader it is
completely not clear, as they look at the call site, which exact mode
is being requested.
Define report_mode enum and change mt_set_mode() to accept is as
an argument instead. This allows to write:
mt_set_modes(hdev, HID_LATENCY_NORMAL, TOUCHPAD_REPORT_ALL);
or
mt_set_modes(hdev, HID_LATENCY_HIGH, TOUCHPAD_REPORT_BUTTONS);
which makes intent much more clear.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
---
drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c b/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
index 99812c0f830b..e4bb2fb5596d 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
@@ -83,6 +83,13 @@ enum latency_mode {
HID_LATENCY_HIGH = 1,
};
+enum report_mode {
+ TOUCHPAD_REPORT_NONE = 0,
+ TOUCHPAD_REPORT_BUTTONS = 1,
+ TOUCHPAD_REPORT_CONTACTS = 2,
+ TOUCHPAD_REPORT_ALL = TOUCHPAD_REPORT_BUTTONS | TOUCHPAD_REPORT_CONTACTS,
+};
+
#define MT_IO_FLAGS_RUNNING 0
#define MT_IO_FLAGS_ACTIVE_SLOTS 1
#define MT_IO_FLAGS_PENDING_SLOTS 2
@@ -1486,8 +1493,7 @@ static bool mt_need_to_apply_feature(struct hid_device *hdev,
struct hid_field *field,
struct hid_usage *usage,
enum latency_mode latency,
- bool surface_switch,
- bool button_switch,
+ enum report_mode report_mode,
bool *inputmode_found)
{
struct mt_device *td = hid_get_drvdata(hdev);
@@ -1542,11 +1548,11 @@ static bool mt_need_to_apply_feature(struct hid_device *hdev,
return true;
case HID_DG_SURFACESWITCH:
- field->value[index] = surface_switch;
+ field->value[index] = report_mode & TOUCHPAD_REPORT_CONTACTS;
return true;
case HID_DG_BUTTONSWITCH:
- field->value[index] = button_switch;
+ field->value[index] = report_mode & TOUCHPAD_REPORT_BUTTONS;
return true;
}
@@ -1554,7 +1560,7 @@ static bool mt_need_to_apply_feature(struct hid_device *hdev,
}
static void mt_set_modes(struct hid_device *hdev, enum latency_mode latency,
- bool surface_switch, bool button_switch)
+ enum report_mode report_mode)
{
struct hid_report_enum *rep_enum;
struct hid_report *rep;
@@ -1579,8 +1585,7 @@ static void mt_set_modes(struct hid_device *hdev, enum latency_mode latency,
rep->field[i],
usage,
latency,
- surface_switch,
- button_switch,
+ report_mode,
&inputmode_found))
update_report = true;
}
@@ -1820,7 +1825,7 @@ static int mt_probe(struct hid_device *hdev, const struct hid_device_id *id)
dev_warn(&hdev->dev, "Cannot allocate sysfs group for %s\n",
hdev->name);
- mt_set_modes(hdev, HID_LATENCY_NORMAL, true, true);
+ mt_set_modes(hdev, HID_LATENCY_NORMAL, TOUCHPAD_REPORT_ALL);
return 0;
}
@@ -1832,9 +1837,9 @@ static int mt_suspend(struct hid_device *hdev, pm_message_t state)
/* High latency is desirable for power savings during S3/S0ix */
if ((td->mtclass.quirks & MT_QUIRK_DISABLE_WAKEUP) ||
!hid_hw_may_wakeup(hdev))
- mt_set_modes(hdev, HID_LATENCY_HIGH, false, false);
+ mt_set_modes(hdev, HID_LATENCY_HIGH, TOUCHPAD_REPORT_NONE);
else
- mt_set_modes(hdev, HID_LATENCY_HIGH, true, true);
+ mt_set_modes(hdev, HID_LATENCY_HIGH, TOUCHPAD_REPORT_ALL);
return 0;
}
@@ -1842,7 +1847,7 @@ static int mt_suspend(struct hid_device *hdev, pm_message_t state)
static int mt_reset_resume(struct hid_device *hdev)
{
mt_release_contacts(hdev);
- mt_set_modes(hdev, HID_LATENCY_NORMAL, true, true);
+ mt_set_modes(hdev, HID_LATENCY_NORMAL, TOUCHPAD_REPORT_ALL);
return 0;
}
@@ -1854,7 +1859,7 @@ static int mt_resume(struct hid_device *hdev)
hid_hw_idle(hdev, 0, 0, HID_REQ_SET_IDLE);
- mt_set_modes(hdev, HID_LATENCY_NORMAL, true, true);
+ mt_set_modes(hdev, HID_LATENCY_NORMAL, TOUCHPAD_REPORT_ALL);
return 0;
}
--
2.47.0.163.g1226f6d8fa-goog
--
Dmitry
On Oct 25 2024, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > mt_set_mode() accepts 2 boolean switches indicating whether the device > (if it follows Windows Precision Touchpad specification) should report > hardware buttons and/or surface contacts. For a casual reader it is > completely not clear, as they look at the call site, which exact mode > is being requested. > > Define report_mode enum and change mt_set_mode() to accept is as > an argument instead. This allows to write: > > mt_set_modes(hdev, HID_LATENCY_NORMAL, TOUCHPAD_REPORT_ALL); > > or > > mt_set_modes(hdev, HID_LATENCY_HIGH, TOUCHPAD_REPORT_BUTTONS); > > which makes intent much more clear. > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++------------ > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c b/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c > index 99812c0f830b..e4bb2fb5596d 100644 > --- a/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c > +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c > @@ -83,6 +83,13 @@ enum latency_mode { > HID_LATENCY_HIGH = 1, > }; > > +enum report_mode { > + TOUCHPAD_REPORT_NONE = 0, > + TOUCHPAD_REPORT_BUTTONS = 1, > + TOUCHPAD_REPORT_CONTACTS = 2, Maybe to be more obvious, BIT(0) and BIT(1) for the 2 values above? I'm just concerned that someone adds "3" if we ever need to add a new value. > + TOUCHPAD_REPORT_ALL = TOUCHPAD_REPORT_BUTTONS | TOUCHPAD_REPORT_CONTACTS, > +}; > + > #define MT_IO_FLAGS_RUNNING 0 > #define MT_IO_FLAGS_ACTIVE_SLOTS 1 > #define MT_IO_FLAGS_PENDING_SLOTS 2 > @@ -1486,8 +1493,7 @@ static bool mt_need_to_apply_feature(struct hid_device *hdev, > struct hid_field *field, > struct hid_usage *usage, > enum latency_mode latency, > - bool surface_switch, > - bool button_switch, > + enum report_mode report_mode, > bool *inputmode_found) > { > struct mt_device *td = hid_get_drvdata(hdev); > @@ -1542,11 +1548,11 @@ static bool mt_need_to_apply_feature(struct hid_device *hdev, > return true; > > case HID_DG_SURFACESWITCH: > - field->value[index] = surface_switch; > + field->value[index] = report_mode & TOUCHPAD_REPORT_CONTACTS; Just to be on the safe side: !!(report_mode & TOUCHPAD_REPORT_CONTACTS); > return true; > > case HID_DG_BUTTONSWITCH: > - field->value[index] = button_switch; > + field->value[index] = report_mode & TOUCHPAD_REPORT_BUTTONS; same here. > return true; > } > > @@ -1554,7 +1560,7 @@ static bool mt_need_to_apply_feature(struct hid_device *hdev, > } > > static void mt_set_modes(struct hid_device *hdev, enum latency_mode latency, > - bool surface_switch, bool button_switch) > + enum report_mode report_mode) > { > struct hid_report_enum *rep_enum; > struct hid_report *rep; > @@ -1579,8 +1585,7 @@ static void mt_set_modes(struct hid_device *hdev, enum latency_mode latency, > rep->field[i], > usage, > latency, > - surface_switch, > - button_switch, > + report_mode, > &inputmode_found)) > update_report = true; > } > @@ -1820,7 +1825,7 @@ static int mt_probe(struct hid_device *hdev, const struct hid_device_id *id) > dev_warn(&hdev->dev, "Cannot allocate sysfs group for %s\n", > hdev->name); > > - mt_set_modes(hdev, HID_LATENCY_NORMAL, true, true); > + mt_set_modes(hdev, HID_LATENCY_NORMAL, TOUCHPAD_REPORT_ALL); > > return 0; > } > @@ -1832,9 +1837,9 @@ static int mt_suspend(struct hid_device *hdev, pm_message_t state) > /* High latency is desirable for power savings during S3/S0ix */ > if ((td->mtclass.quirks & MT_QUIRK_DISABLE_WAKEUP) || > !hid_hw_may_wakeup(hdev)) > - mt_set_modes(hdev, HID_LATENCY_HIGH, false, false); > + mt_set_modes(hdev, HID_LATENCY_HIGH, TOUCHPAD_REPORT_NONE); > else > - mt_set_modes(hdev, HID_LATENCY_HIGH, true, true); > + mt_set_modes(hdev, HID_LATENCY_HIGH, TOUCHPAD_REPORT_ALL); > > return 0; > } > @@ -1842,7 +1847,7 @@ static int mt_suspend(struct hid_device *hdev, pm_message_t state) > static int mt_reset_resume(struct hid_device *hdev) > { > mt_release_contacts(hdev); > - mt_set_modes(hdev, HID_LATENCY_NORMAL, true, true); > + mt_set_modes(hdev, HID_LATENCY_NORMAL, TOUCHPAD_REPORT_ALL); heh, I wonder if we actually need the split buttons/touches, because in all cases, we are either reporting None or All. Anyway, with the couple of nitpicks: Reviewed-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org> Cheers, Benjamin > return 0; > } > > @@ -1854,7 +1859,7 @@ static int mt_resume(struct hid_device *hdev) > > hid_hw_idle(hdev, 0, 0, HID_REQ_SET_IDLE); > > - mt_set_modes(hdev, HID_LATENCY_NORMAL, true, true); > + mt_set_modes(hdev, HID_LATENCY_NORMAL, TOUCHPAD_REPORT_ALL); > > return 0; > } > -- > 2.47.0.163.g1226f6d8fa-goog > > > -- > Dmitry
On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 04:47:55PM +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > On Oct 25 2024, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > mt_set_mode() accepts 2 boolean switches indicating whether the device > > (if it follows Windows Precision Touchpad specification) should report > > hardware buttons and/or surface contacts. For a casual reader it is > > completely not clear, as they look at the call site, which exact mode > > is being requested. > > > > Define report_mode enum and change mt_set_mode() to accept is as > > an argument instead. This allows to write: > > > > mt_set_modes(hdev, HID_LATENCY_NORMAL, TOUCHPAD_REPORT_ALL); > > > > or > > > > mt_set_modes(hdev, HID_LATENCY_HIGH, TOUCHPAD_REPORT_BUTTONS); > > > > which makes intent much more clear. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> > > --- > > drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++------------ > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c b/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c > > index 99812c0f830b..e4bb2fb5596d 100644 > > --- a/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c > > +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c > > @@ -83,6 +83,13 @@ enum latency_mode { > > HID_LATENCY_HIGH = 1, > > }; > > > > +enum report_mode { > > + TOUCHPAD_REPORT_NONE = 0, > > + TOUCHPAD_REPORT_BUTTONS = 1, > > + TOUCHPAD_REPORT_CONTACTS = 2, > > Maybe to be more obvious, BIT(0) and BIT(1) for the 2 values above? > > I'm just concerned that someone adds "3" if we ever need to add a new > value. Right, I'll change it. > > > + TOUCHPAD_REPORT_ALL = TOUCHPAD_REPORT_BUTTONS | TOUCHPAD_REPORT_CONTACTS, > > +}; > > + > > #define MT_IO_FLAGS_RUNNING 0 > > #define MT_IO_FLAGS_ACTIVE_SLOTS 1 > > #define MT_IO_FLAGS_PENDING_SLOTS 2 > > @@ -1486,8 +1493,7 @@ static bool mt_need_to_apply_feature(struct hid_device *hdev, > > struct hid_field *field, > > struct hid_usage *usage, > > enum latency_mode latency, > > - bool surface_switch, > > - bool button_switch, > > + enum report_mode report_mode, > > bool *inputmode_found) > > { > > struct mt_device *td = hid_get_drvdata(hdev); > > @@ -1542,11 +1548,11 @@ static bool mt_need_to_apply_feature(struct hid_device *hdev, > > return true; > > > > case HID_DG_SURFACESWITCH: > > - field->value[index] = surface_switch; > > + field->value[index] = report_mode & TOUCHPAD_REPORT_CONTACTS; > > Just to be on the safe side: > !!(report_mode & TOUCHPAD_REPORT_CONTACTS); Oh, yes, that makes sense. I'll send an updated patch in a minute. Thanks. -- Dmitry
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.