include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h | 2 +- include/linux/security.h | 2 +- security/landlock/fs.c | 2 +- security/security.c | 2 +- security/selinux/hooks.c | 2 +- 5 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
The "sb_remount" hook has implementations registered in SELinux and
Landlock. Looking at the function implementations we observe that the
"sb" parameter is not changing.
Mark the "sb" parameter of LSM hook security_sb_remount() as "const"
since it will not be changing in the LSM hook.
Signed-off-by: Khadija Kamran <kamrankhadijadj@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h | 2 +-
include/linux/security.h | 2 +-
security/landlock/fs.c | 2 +-
security/security.c | 2 +-
security/selinux/hooks.c | 2 +-
5 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h b/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h
index 6bb55e61e8e8..dca689c9ac04 100644
--- a/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h
+++ b/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ LSM_HOOK(void, LSM_RET_VOID, sb_free_security, struct super_block *sb)
LSM_HOOK(void, LSM_RET_VOID, sb_free_mnt_opts, void *mnt_opts)
LSM_HOOK(int, 0, sb_eat_lsm_opts, char *orig, void **mnt_opts)
LSM_HOOK(int, 0, sb_mnt_opts_compat, struct super_block *sb, void *mnt_opts)
-LSM_HOOK(int, 0, sb_remount, struct super_block *sb, void *mnt_opts)
+LSM_HOOK(int, 0, sb_remount, const struct super_block *sb, void *mnt_opts)
LSM_HOOK(int, 0, sb_kern_mount, struct super_block *sb)
LSM_HOOK(int, 0, sb_show_options, struct seq_file *m, struct super_block *sb)
LSM_HOOK(int, 0, sb_statfs, struct dentry *dentry)
diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
index e2734e9e44d5..ce08ed7d5437 100644
--- a/include/linux/security.h
+++ b/include/linux/security.h
@@ -301,7 +301,7 @@ void security_sb_free(struct super_block *sb);
void security_free_mnt_opts(void **mnt_opts);
int security_sb_eat_lsm_opts(char *options, void **mnt_opts);
int security_sb_mnt_opts_compat(struct super_block *sb, void *mnt_opts);
-int security_sb_remount(struct super_block *sb, void *mnt_opts);
+int security_sb_remount(const struct super_block *sb, void *mnt_opts);
int security_sb_kern_mount(struct super_block *sb);
int security_sb_show_options(struct seq_file *m, struct super_block *sb);
int security_sb_statfs(struct dentry *dentry);
diff --git a/security/landlock/fs.c b/security/landlock/fs.c
index 1c0c198f6fdb..fabe324922ec 100644
--- a/security/landlock/fs.c
+++ b/security/landlock/fs.c
@@ -1074,7 +1074,7 @@ static int hook_sb_umount(struct vfsmount *const mnt, const int flags)
return -EPERM;
}
-static int hook_sb_remount(struct super_block *const sb, void *const mnt_opts)
+static int hook_sb_remount(const struct super_block *const sb, void *const mnt_opts)
{
if (!landlock_get_current_domain())
return 0;
diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
index d5ff7ff45b77..acc8a92ba857 100644
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@ -1289,7 +1289,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_sb_mnt_opts_compat);
*
* Return: Returns 0 if permission is granted.
*/
-int security_sb_remount(struct super_block *sb,
+int security_sb_remount(const struct super_block *sb,
void *mnt_opts)
{
return call_int_hook(sb_remount, 0, sb, mnt_opts);
diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
index 79b4890e9936..e4de42150b87 100644
--- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
+++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
@@ -2628,7 +2628,7 @@ static int selinux_sb_mnt_opts_compat(struct super_block *sb, void *mnt_opts)
return 0;
}
-static int selinux_sb_remount(struct super_block *sb, void *mnt_opts)
+static int selinux_sb_remount(const struct super_block *sb, void *mnt_opts)
{
struct selinux_mnt_opts *opts = mnt_opts;
struct superblock_security_struct *sbsec = selinux_superblock(sb);
--
2.34.1
Hi Khadija,
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 01:51:27PM +0500, Khadija Kamran wrote:
> The "sb_remount" hook has implementations registered in SELinux and
> Landlock. Looking at the function implementations we observe that the
> "sb" parameter is not changing.
>
> Mark the "sb" parameter of LSM hook security_sb_remount() as "const"
> since it will not be changing in the LSM hook.
>
> Signed-off-by: Khadija Kamran <kamrankhadijadj@gmail.com>
> ---
> include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h | 2 +-
> include/linux/security.h | 2 +-
> security/landlock/fs.c | 2 +-
> security/security.c | 2 +-
> security/selinux/hooks.c | 2 +-
> 5 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/security/landlock/fs.c b/security/landlock/fs.c
> index 1c0c198f6fdb..fabe324922ec 100644
> --- a/security/landlock/fs.c
> +++ b/security/landlock/fs.c
> @@ -1074,7 +1074,7 @@ static int hook_sb_umount(struct vfsmount *const mnt, const int flags)
> return -EPERM;
> }
>
> -static int hook_sb_remount(struct super_block *const sb, void *const mnt_opts)
> +static int hook_sb_remount(const struct super_block *const sb, void *const mnt_opts)
Please format with clang-format -i security/landlock/*.[ch]
> {
> if (!landlock_get_current_domain())
> return 0;
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 8:44 AM Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> wrote: > > Hi Khadija, > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 01:51:27PM +0500, Khadija Kamran wrote: > > The "sb_remount" hook has implementations registered in SELinux and > > Landlock. Looking at the function implementations we observe that the > > "sb" parameter is not changing. > > > > Mark the "sb" parameter of LSM hook security_sb_remount() as "const" > > since it will not be changing in the LSM hook. > > > > Signed-off-by: Khadija Kamran <kamrankhadijadj@gmail.com> > > --- > > include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h | 2 +- > > include/linux/security.h | 2 +- > > security/landlock/fs.c | 2 +- > > security/security.c | 2 +- > > security/selinux/hooks.c | 2 +- > > 5 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > diff --git a/security/landlock/fs.c b/security/landlock/fs.c > > index 1c0c198f6fdb..fabe324922ec 100644 > > --- a/security/landlock/fs.c > > +++ b/security/landlock/fs.c > > @@ -1074,7 +1074,7 @@ static int hook_sb_umount(struct vfsmount *const mnt, const int flags) > > return -EPERM; > > } > > > > -static int hook_sb_remount(struct super_block *const sb, void *const mnt_opts) > > +static int hook_sb_remount(const struct super_block *const sb, void *const mnt_opts) > > Please format with clang-format -i security/landlock/*.[ch] Hi Khadija, can you please format the security/landlock/fs.c change as requested by Mickaël? You can find information on running clang-format on the Linux kernel at the link below: * https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/clang-format.html -- paul-moore.com
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.