Fixed all CHECK: Unbalanced braces around else statement,
CHECK: braces {} should be used on all arms of this statement,
and CHECK: 'specificed' may be misspelled - perhaps 'specified'?
as reported by checkpatch to adhere to the Linux kernel
coding-style guidelines.

Signed-off-by: Alexon Oliveira <alexondunkan@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/vme_user/vme.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/vme_user/vme.c b/drivers/staging/vme_user/vme.c
index d0366dd3f2b1..1e11047acf54 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/vme_user/vme.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/vme_user/vme.c
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(vme_lm_get);
  * @callback: Pointer to callback function called when triggered.
  * @data: Generic pointer that will be passed to the callback function.
  *
- * Attach a callback to the specificed offset into the location monitors
+ * Attach a callback to the specified offset into the location monitors
  * monitored addresses. A generic pointer is provided to allow data to be
  * passed to the callback when called.
  *
@@ -1655,7 +1655,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(vme_lm_attach);
  * @resource: Pointer to VME location monitor resource.
  * @monitor: Offset to which callback should be removed.
  *
- * Remove the callback associated with the specificed offset into the
+ * Remove the callback associated with the specified offset into the
  * location monitors monitored addresses.
  *
  * Return: Zero on success, -EINVAL when provided with an invalid location
@@ -1866,8 +1866,9 @@ static int __vme_register_driver_bus(struct vme_driver *drv,
 		if (vdev->dev.platform_data) {
 			list_add_tail(&vdev->drv_list, &drv->devices);
 			list_add_tail(&vdev->bridge_list, &bridge->devices);
-		} else
+		} else {
 			device_unregister(&vdev->dev);
+		}
 	}
 	return 0;
 
-- 
2.41.0

On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 10:40:12PM -0300, Alexon Oliveira wrote:
> Fixed all CHECK: Unbalanced braces around else statement,
> CHECK: braces {} should be used on all arms of this statement,
> and CHECK: 'specificed' may be misspelled - perhaps 'specified'?
> as reported by checkpatch to adhere to the Linux kernel
> coding-style guidelines.

That's two different things, so that means it should be two different
patches.  Please send a patch series for this.

thanks,

greg k-h

On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 08:49:25AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 10:40:12PM -0300, Alexon Oliveira wrote:
> > Fixed all CHECK: Unbalanced braces around else statement,
> > CHECK: braces {} should be used on all arms of this statement,
> > and CHECK: 'specificed' may be misspelled - perhaps 'specified'?
> > as reported by checkpatch to adhere to the Linux kernel
> > coding-style guidelines.
> 
> That's two different things, so that means it should be two different
> patches.  Please send a patch series for this.
> 

ACK. I'm splitting them and resubmitting right now.

> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Thank you.

Alexon Oliveira