drivers/usb/serial/quatech2.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
This patch addresses a null-ptr-deref in qt2_process_read_urb() due to
an incorrect bounds check in the following:
""
if (newport > serial->num_ports) {
dev_err(&port->dev,
"%s - port change to invalid port: %i\n",
__func__, newport);
break;
}
""
The condition doesn't account for the valid range of the serial->port
buffer, which is from 0 to serial->num_ports - 1. When newport is equal
to serial->num_ports, the assignment of "port" in the
following code is out-of-bounds and NULL:
""
serial_priv->current_port = newport;
port = serial->port[serial_priv->current_port];
""
The fix checks if newport is greater than or equal to serial->num_ports
indicating it is out-of-bounds.
Reported-by: syzbot <syzbot+506479ebf12fe435d01a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=506479ebf12fe435d01a
Tested-by: syzbot <syzbot+506479ebf12fe435d01a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Tested-by: Qasim Ijaz <qasdev00@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Qasim Ijaz <qasdev00@gmail.com>
---
drivers/usb/serial/quatech2.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/quatech2.c b/drivers/usb/serial/quatech2.c
index a317bdbd00ad..72fe83a6c978 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/serial/quatech2.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/serial/quatech2.c
@@ -503,7 +503,7 @@ static void qt2_process_read_urb(struct urb *urb)
newport = *(ch + 3);
- if (newport > serial->num_ports) {
+ if (newport >= serial->num_ports) {
dev_err(&port->dev,
"%s - port change to invalid port: %i\n",
__func__, newport);
--
2.39.5
On Sat, Jan 11, 2025 at 08:08:49PM +0000, qasdev wrote:
> This patch addresses a null-ptr-deref in qt2_process_read_urb() due to
> an incorrect bounds check in the following:
>
> ""
> if (newport > serial->num_ports) {
> dev_err(&port->dev,
> "%s - port change to invalid port: %i\n",
> __func__, newport);
> break;
> }
> ""
>
> The condition doesn't account for the valid range of the serial->port
> buffer, which is from 0 to serial->num_ports - 1. When newport is equal
> to serial->num_ports, the assignment of "port" in the
> following code is out-of-bounds and NULL:
>
> ""
> serial_priv->current_port = newport;
> port = serial->port[serial_priv->current_port];
>
> ""
>
> The fix checks if newport is greater than or equal to serial->num_ports
> indicating it is out-of-bounds.
>
> Reported-by: syzbot <syzbot+506479ebf12fe435d01a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=506479ebf12fe435d01a
> Tested-by: syzbot <syzbot+506479ebf12fe435d01a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
> Tested-by: Qasim Ijaz <qasdev00@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Qasim Ijaz <qasdev00@gmail.com>
Your signed-off-by does not match your "From:" line :(
Also, no need to add a tested-by when you sign off on your own patch,
that is usually implied.
thanks,
greg k-h
On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 09:42:45AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2025 at 08:08:49PM +0000, qasdev wrote:
> > This patch addresses a null-ptr-deref in qt2_process_read_urb() due to
> > an incorrect bounds check in the following:
> >
> > ""
> > if (newport > serial->num_ports) {
> > dev_err(&port->dev,
> > "%s - port change to invalid port: %i\n",
> > __func__, newport);
> > break;
> > }
> > ""
> >
> > The condition doesn't account for the valid range of the serial->port
> > buffer, which is from 0 to serial->num_ports - 1. When newport is equal
> > to serial->num_ports, the assignment of "port" in the
> > following code is out-of-bounds and NULL:
> >
> > ""
> > serial_priv->current_port = newport;
> > port = serial->port[serial_priv->current_port];
> >
> > ""
> >
> > The fix checks if newport is greater than or equal to serial->num_ports
> > indicating it is out-of-bounds.
> >
> > Reported-by: syzbot <syzbot+506479ebf12fe435d01a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
> > Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=506479ebf12fe435d01a
> > Tested-by: syzbot <syzbot+506479ebf12fe435d01a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
> > Tested-by: Qasim Ijaz <qasdev00@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Qasim Ijaz <qasdev00@gmail.com>
>
> Your signed-off-by does not match your "From:" line :(
>
> Also, no need to add a tested-by when you sign off on your own patch,
> that is usually implied.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Hi Greg,
Thank you for your feedback on my patch. I’ve sent a v2 patch in a new thread, addressing the issues with the From: line and removing the redundant Tested-by tag.
Best regards,
Qasim
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.