drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c:322:20: warning: symbol 'quirk_s2idle_bug' was not declared. Should it be static?

Fixes: a50dfa903391 ("platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Add a s2idle resume quirk for a number of laptops")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
---
 drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
index f385450af8647..d5431d3d4246f 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
@@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ struct quirk_entry quirk_btusb_bug = {
 	.btusb_bug = true,
 };
 
-struct quirk_entry quirk_s2idle_bug = {
+static struct quirk_entry quirk_s2idle_bug = {
 	.s2idle_bug_mmio = 0xfed80380,
 };

Hi,

On 5/3/22 20:21, kernel test robot wrote:
> drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c:322:20: warning: symbol 'quirk_s2idle_bug' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Fixes: a50dfa903391 ("platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Add a s2idle resume quirk for a number of laptops")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

Thanks, since the original patch was still in my review-hans
branch (and not yet in for-next) I've squashed this fix into
the original patch.

Regards,

Hans



> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> index f385450af8647..d5431d3d4246f 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> @@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ struct quirk_entry quirk_btusb_bug = {
>  	.btusb_bug = true,
>  };
>  
> -struct quirk_entry quirk_s2idle_bug = {
> +static struct quirk_entry quirk_s2idle_bug = {
>  	.s2idle_bug_mmio = 0xfed80380,
>  };
>  
>