[RFC PATCH pdx86-platform-drivers-x86] platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: quirk_btusb_bug can be static

kernel test robot posted 1 patch 4 years ago
drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c |    2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
[RFC PATCH pdx86-platform-drivers-x86] platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: quirk_btusb_bug can be static
Posted by kernel test robot 4 years ago
drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c:317:20: warning: symbol 'quirk_btusb_bug' was not declared. Should it be static?

Fixes: 25eecc2ff6cc ("platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Convert btusb DMI list to quirks")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
---
 drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
index aed17d32ed84b..eefa22e86ae10 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
@@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ struct quirk_entry {
 	bool btusb_bug;
 };
 
-struct quirk_entry quirk_btusb_bug = {
+static struct quirk_entry quirk_btusb_bug = {
 	.btusb_bug = true,
 };
RE: [RFC PATCH pdx86-platform-drivers-x86] platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: quirk_btusb_bug can be static
Posted by Limonciello, Mario 4 years ago
[Public]



> -----Original Message-----
> From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2022 06:18
> To: Limonciello, Mario <Mario.Limonciello@amd.com>
> Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org; Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>; Hans de Goede
> <hdegoede@redhat.com>; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [RFC PATCH pdx86-platform-drivers-x86] platform/x86:
> thinkpad_acpi: quirk_btusb_bug can be static
> 
> drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c:317:20: warning: symbol
> 'quirk_btusb_bug' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Fixes: 25eecc2ff6cc ("platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Convert btusb DMI list to
> quirks")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>

> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> index aed17d32ed84b..eefa22e86ae10 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> @@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ struct quirk_entry {
>  	bool btusb_bug;
>  };
> 
> -struct quirk_entry quirk_btusb_bug = {
> +static struct quirk_entry quirk_btusb_bug = {
>  	.btusb_bug = true,
>  };
> 
Re: [RFC PATCH pdx86-platform-drivers-x86] platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: quirk_btusb_bug can be static
Posted by Hans de Goede 4 years ago
Hi,

On 5/3/22 15:07, Limonciello, Mario wrote:
> [Public]
> 
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2022 06:18
>> To: Limonciello, Mario <Mario.Limonciello@amd.com>
>> Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org; Andy Shevchenko
>> <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>; Hans de Goede
>> <hdegoede@redhat.com>; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: [RFC PATCH pdx86-platform-drivers-x86] platform/x86:
>> thinkpad_acpi: quirk_btusb_bug can be static
>>
>> drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c:317:20: warning: symbol
>> 'quirk_btusb_bug' was not declared. Should it be static?
>>
>> Fixes: 25eecc2ff6cc ("platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Convert btusb DMI list to
>> quirks")
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>

Thanks, since the original patch was still in my review-hans
branch (and not yet in for-next) I've squashed this fix into
the original patch.

Regards,

Hans





> 
>> ---
>>  drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c |    2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
>> b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
>> index aed17d32ed84b..eefa22e86ae10 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
>> @@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ struct quirk_entry {
>>  	bool btusb_bug;
>>  };
>>
>> -struct quirk_entry quirk_btusb_bug = {
>> +static struct quirk_entry quirk_btusb_bug = {
>>  	.btusb_bug = true,
>>  };
>>
>
Re: [RFC PATCH pdx86-platform-drivers-x86] platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: quirk_btusb_bug can be static
Posted by Hans de Goede 4 years ago
Hi,

On 5/6/22 12:09, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 5/3/22 15:07, Limonciello, Mario wrote:
>> [Public]
>>
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2022 06:18
>>> To: Limonciello, Mario <Mario.Limonciello@amd.com>
>>> Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org; Andy Shevchenko
>>> <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>; Hans de Goede
>>> <hdegoede@redhat.com>; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>>> Subject: [RFC PATCH pdx86-platform-drivers-x86] platform/x86:
>>> thinkpad_acpi: quirk_btusb_bug can be static
>>>
>>> drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c:317:20: warning: symbol
>>> 'quirk_btusb_bug' was not declared. Should it be static?
>>>
>>> Fixes: 25eecc2ff6cc ("platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Convert btusb DMI list to
>>> quirks")
>>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
> 
> Thanks, since the original patch was still in my review-hans
> branch (and not yet in for-next) I've squashed this fix into
> the original patch.

I've just realized there is another issue with this
("platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Convert btusb DMI list to quirks")

Patch, it only sets tp_features.quirks after bluetooth_init()
has already run, so the:

	if (tp_features.quirks && tp_features.quirks->btusb_bug && ...

check will never be true since tp_features.quirks is being set
too late.

I'll squash in a change moving the:

        dmi_id = dmi_first_match(fwbug_list);
        if (dmi_id)
                tp_features.quirks = dmi_id->driver_data;

to higher inside thinkpad_acpi_module_init() to fix this,
while keeping the:

#ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND
       if (tp_features.quirks && tp_features.quirks->s2idle_bug_mmio) {
               if (!acpi_register_lps0_dev(&thinkpad_acpi_s2idle_dev_ops))
                       pr_info("Using s2idle quirk to avoid %s platform firmware bug\n",
                               (dmi_id && dmi_id->ident) ? dmi_id->ident : "");
       }
#endif

block at then end of thinkpad_acpi_module_init() so as to not change
the ordering wrt registering the lps0_dev.

Regards,

Hans





> 
> Regards,
> 
> Hans
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c |    2 +-
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
>>> b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
>>> index aed17d32ed84b..eefa22e86ae10 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
>>> @@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ struct quirk_entry {
>>>  	bool btusb_bug;
>>>  };
>>>
>>> -struct quirk_entry quirk_btusb_bug = {
>>> +static struct quirk_entry quirk_btusb_bug = {
>>>  	.btusb_bug = true,
>>>  };
>>>
>>