drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/guc_capture_fwif.h | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Zero-length arrays are deprecated[1] and we are moving towards
adopting C99 flexible-array members, instead. So, replace zero-length
arrays in a couple of structures (three, actually) with flex-array
members.
This helps with the ongoing efforts to tighten the FORTIFY_SOURCE
routines on memcpy() and help us make progress towards globally
enabling -fstrict-flex-arrays=3 [2].
Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays [1]
Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/602902.html [2]
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/78
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/guc_capture_fwif.h | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/guc_capture_fwif.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/guc_capture_fwif.h
index 3624abfd22d1..9d589c28f40f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/guc_capture_fwif.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/guc_capture_fwif.h
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ struct guc_debug_capture_list_header {
struct guc_debug_capture_list {
struct guc_debug_capture_list_header header;
- struct guc_mmio_reg regs[0];
+ struct guc_mmio_reg regs[];
} __packed;
/**
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ struct guc_state_capture_header_t {
struct guc_state_capture_t {
struct guc_state_capture_header_t header;
- struct guc_mmio_reg mmio_entries[0];
+ struct guc_mmio_reg mmio_entries[];
} __packed;
enum guc_capture_group_types {
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ struct guc_state_capture_group_header_t {
/* this is the top level structure where an error-capture dump starts */
struct guc_state_capture_group_t {
struct guc_state_capture_group_header_t grp_header;
- struct guc_state_capture_t capture_entries[0];
+ struct guc_state_capture_t capture_entries[];
} __packed;
/**
--
2.34.1
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 10:44:53AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > Zero-length arrays are deprecated[1] and we are moving towards > adopting C99 flexible-array members, instead. So, replace zero-length > arrays in a couple of structures (three, actually) with flex-array > members. > > This helps with the ongoing efforts to tighten the FORTIFY_SOURCE > routines on memcpy() and help us make progress towards globally > enabling -fstrict-flex-arrays=3 [2]. > > Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays [1] > Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/602902.html [2] > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/78 > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/guc_capture_fwif.h | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/guc_capture_fwif.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/guc_capture_fwif.h > index 3624abfd22d1..9d589c28f40f 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/guc_capture_fwif.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/guc_capture_fwif.h > @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ struct guc_debug_capture_list_header { > > struct guc_debug_capture_list { > struct guc_debug_capture_list_header header; > - struct guc_mmio_reg regs[0]; > + struct guc_mmio_reg regs[]; > } __packed; > > /** > @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ struct guc_state_capture_header_t { > > struct guc_state_capture_t { > struct guc_state_capture_header_t header; > - struct guc_mmio_reg mmio_entries[0]; > + struct guc_mmio_reg mmio_entries[]; > } __packed; > > enum guc_capture_group_types { > @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ struct guc_state_capture_group_header_t { > /* this is the top level structure where an error-capture dump starts */ > struct guc_state_capture_group_t { > struct guc_state_capture_group_header_t grp_header; > - struct guc_state_capture_t capture_entries[0]; > + struct guc_state_capture_t capture_entries[]; Please notice we are currently using sizeof(struct ...). Along with your proposed changes, shouldn't we also start using the struct_size() which already take the flexible array into account? > } __packed; > > /** > -- > 2.34.1 >
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 02:28:11PM -0500, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 10:44:53AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > > Zero-length arrays are deprecated[1] and we are moving towards > > adopting C99 flexible-array members, instead. So, replace zero-length > > arrays in a couple of structures (three, actually) with flex-array > > members. > > > > This helps with the ongoing efforts to tighten the FORTIFY_SOURCE > > routines on memcpy() and help us make progress towards globally > > enabling -fstrict-flex-arrays=3 [2]. > > > > Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays [1] > > Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/602902.html [2] > > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/78 > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> > > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/guc_capture_fwif.h | 6 +++--- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/guc_capture_fwif.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/guc_capture_fwif.h > > index 3624abfd22d1..9d589c28f40f 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/guc_capture_fwif.h > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/guc_capture_fwif.h > > @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ struct guc_debug_capture_list_header { > > > > struct guc_debug_capture_list { > > struct guc_debug_capture_list_header header; > > - struct guc_mmio_reg regs[0]; > > + struct guc_mmio_reg regs[]; > > } __packed; > > > > /** > > @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ struct guc_state_capture_header_t { > > > > struct guc_state_capture_t { > > struct guc_state_capture_header_t header; > > - struct guc_mmio_reg mmio_entries[0]; > > + struct guc_mmio_reg mmio_entries[]; > > } __packed; > > > > enum guc_capture_group_types { > > @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ struct guc_state_capture_group_header_t { > > /* this is the top level structure where an error-capture dump starts */ > > struct guc_state_capture_group_t { > > struct guc_state_capture_group_header_t grp_header; > > - struct guc_state_capture_t capture_entries[0]; > > + struct guc_state_capture_t capture_entries[]; > > Please notice we are currently using sizeof(struct ...). Yep; I noticed that. :) > Along with your proposed changes, shouldn't we also start using > the struct_size() which already take the flexible array into account? Not necessarily. In recent times, we don't include the struct_size changes in the same patch as the flex-array transformation. That's usually a follow-up patch. -- Gustavo
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 01:42:57PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 02:28:11PM -0500, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 10:44:53AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > > > Zero-length arrays are deprecated[1] and we are moving towards > > > adopting C99 flexible-array members, instead. So, replace zero-length > > > arrays in a couple of structures (three, actually) with flex-array > > > members. > > > > > > This helps with the ongoing efforts to tighten the FORTIFY_SOURCE > > > routines on memcpy() and help us make progress towards globally > > > enabling -fstrict-flex-arrays=3 [2]. > > > > > > Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays [1] > > > Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/602902.html [2] > > > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/78 > > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> > > > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/guc_capture_fwif.h | 6 +++--- > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/guc_capture_fwif.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/guc_capture_fwif.h > > > index 3624abfd22d1..9d589c28f40f 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/guc_capture_fwif.h > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/guc_capture_fwif.h > > > @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ struct guc_debug_capture_list_header { > > > > > > struct guc_debug_capture_list { > > > struct guc_debug_capture_list_header header; > > > - struct guc_mmio_reg regs[0]; > > > + struct guc_mmio_reg regs[]; > > > } __packed; > > > > > > /** > > > @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ struct guc_state_capture_header_t { > > > > > > struct guc_state_capture_t { > > > struct guc_state_capture_header_t header; > > > - struct guc_mmio_reg mmio_entries[0]; > > > + struct guc_mmio_reg mmio_entries[]; > > > } __packed; > > > > > > enum guc_capture_group_types { > > > @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ struct guc_state_capture_group_header_t { > > > /* this is the top level structure where an error-capture dump starts */ > > > struct guc_state_capture_group_t { > > > struct guc_state_capture_group_header_t grp_header; > > > - struct guc_state_capture_t capture_entries[0]; > > > + struct guc_state_capture_t capture_entries[]; > > > > Please notice we are currently using sizeof(struct ...). > > Yep; I noticed that. :) > > > Along with your proposed changes, shouldn't we also start using > > the struct_size() which already take the flexible array into account? > > Not necessarily. In recent times, we don't include the struct_size > changes in the same patch as the flex-array transformation. That's > usually a follow-up patch. okay, if that's not a problem, let's go with this for now and wait for the follow ups. Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> (and pushing it right now. Thanks for the patch) > > -- > Gustavo
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.