Replace the use of udelay by usleep_range as suggested by checkpatch:

CHECK: usleep_range is preferred over udelay; see Documentation/timers/timers-howto.rst
+               udelay(30);

CHECK: usleep_range is preferred over udelay; see Documentation/timers/timers-howto.rst
+               udelay(50);

Signed-off-by: Tanjuate Brunostar <tanjubrunostar0@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/rts5208/ms.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rts5208/ms.c b/drivers/staging/rts5208/ms.c
index 14449f8afad5..ae72437b5482 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rts5208/ms.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rts5208/ms.c
@@ -3235,7 +3235,7 @@ static int ms_write_multiple_pages(struct rtsx_chip *chip, u16 old_blk,
 			return STATUS_FAIL;
 		}
 
-		udelay(30);
+		usleep_range(30, 30);
 
 		rtsx_init_cmd(chip);
 
@@ -4157,7 +4157,7 @@ int mg_set_ICV(struct scsi_cmnd *srb, struct rtsx_chip *chip)
 
 #ifdef MG_SET_ICV_SLOW
 	for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
-		udelay(50);
+		usleep_range(50, 50);
 
 		rtsx_init_cmd(chip);
 
-- 
2.34.1

On Tue, 2022-10-18 at 14:04 +0000, Tanjuate Brunostar wrote:
> Replace the use of udelay by usleep_range as suggested by checkpatch:
> 
> CHECK: usleep_range is preferred over udelay; see Documentation/timers/timers-howto.rst
> +               udelay(30);
[]
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rts5208/ms.c b/drivers/staging/rts5208/ms.c
[]
> @@ -3235,7 +3235,7 @@ static int ms_write_multiple_pages(struct rtsx_chip *chip, u16 old_blk,
>  			return STATUS_FAIL;
>  		}
>  
> -		udelay(30);
> +		usleep_range(30, 30);

This isn't useful.  Please read the Documentation/timers.

On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 5:40 AM Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2022-10-18 at 14:04 +0000, Tanjuate Brunostar wrote:
> > Replace the use of udelay by usleep_range as suggested by checkpatch:
> >
> > CHECK: usleep_range is preferred over udelay; see Documentation/timers/timers-howto.rst
> > +               udelay(30);
> []
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rts5208/ms.c b/drivers/staging/rts5208/ms.c
> []
> > @@ -3235,7 +3235,7 @@ static int ms_write_multiple_pages(struct rtsx_chip *chip, u16 old_blk,
> >                       return STATUS_FAIL;
> >               }
> >
> > -             udelay(30);
> > +             usleep_range(30, 30);
>
> >This isn't useful.  Please read the Documentation/timers.

Yes I read the documentation and realized the changes were not necessary