[PATCH] Documentation: Fixed a typo in atomic_t.txt

Kushagra Verma posted 1 patch 2 years, 9 months ago
Documentation/atomic_t.txt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
[PATCH] Documentation: Fixed a typo in atomic_t.txt
Posted by Kushagra Verma 2 years, 9 months ago
Fixed a typo in the word 'architecture'.

Signed-off-by: Kushagra Verma <kushagra765@outlook.com>
---
 Documentation/atomic_t.txt | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/atomic_t.txt b/Documentation/atomic_t.txt
index 0f1ffa03db09..d7adc6d543db 100644
--- a/Documentation/atomic_t.txt
+++ b/Documentation/atomic_t.txt
@@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ atomic operations.
 
 Specifically 'simple' cmpxchg() loops are expected to not starve one another
 indefinitely. However, this is not evident on LL/SC architectures, because
-while an LL/SC architecure 'can/should/must' provide forward progress
+while an LL/SC architecture 'can/should/must' provide forward progress
 guarantees between competing LL/SC sections, such a guarantee does not
 transfer to cmpxchg() implemented using LL/SC. Consider:
 
-- 
2.38.1
Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Fixed a typo in atomic_t.txt
Posted by Paul E. McKenney 2 years, 9 months ago
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 06:50:59PM +0530, Kushagra Verma wrote:
> Fixed a typo in the word 'architecture'.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kushagra Verma <kushagra765@outlook.com>

Good eyes!  Queued for further review, thank you!

							Thanx, Paul

> ---
>  Documentation/atomic_t.txt | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/atomic_t.txt b/Documentation/atomic_t.txt
> index 0f1ffa03db09..d7adc6d543db 100644
> --- a/Documentation/atomic_t.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/atomic_t.txt
> @@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ atomic operations.
>  
>  Specifically 'simple' cmpxchg() loops are expected to not starve one another
>  indefinitely. However, this is not evident on LL/SC architectures, because
> -while an LL/SC architecure 'can/should/must' provide forward progress
> +while an LL/SC architecture 'can/should/must' provide forward progress
>  guarantees between competing LL/SC sections, such a guarantee does not
>  transfer to cmpxchg() implemented using LL/SC. Consider:
>  
> -- 
> 2.38.1
>