RE: [PATCH v8 00/32] x86,fs/resctrl telemetry monitoring

Luck, Tony posted 32 patches 1 month, 2 weeks ago
Only 0 patches received!
There is a newer version of this series
RE: [PATCH v8 00/32] x86,fs/resctrl telemetry monitoring
Posted by Luck, Tony 1 month, 2 weeks ago
> > The INTEL_PMT_DISCOVERY driver provides intel_pmt_get_regions_by_feature()
>
> INTEL_PMT_DISCOVERY -> INTEL_PMT_TELEMETRY ?

Reinette,

Perhaps.  The discovery driver is somewhat it's own thing:

drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_PMT_DISCOVERY)       += pmt_discovery.o

But it is automatically pulled in if you enable INTEL_PMT_TELEMETRY:

drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/Kconfig-config INTEL_PMT_TELEMETRY
drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/Kconfig- tristate "Intel Platform Monitoring Technology (PMT) Telemetry driver"
drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/Kconfig- depends on INTEL_VSEC
drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/Kconfig: select INTEL_PMT_DISCOVERY

-Tony
Re: [PATCH v8 00/32] x86,fs/resctrl telemetry monitoring
Posted by Reinette Chatre 1 month, 2 weeks ago
Hi Tony,

On 8/14/25 8:44 AM, Luck, Tony wrote:
>>> The INTEL_PMT_DISCOVERY driver provides intel_pmt_get_regions_by_feature()
>>
>> INTEL_PMT_DISCOVERY -> INTEL_PMT_TELEMETRY ?
> 
> Reinette,
> 
> Perhaps.  The discovery driver is somewhat it's own thing:
> 
> drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_PMT_DISCOVERY)       += pmt_discovery.o
> 
> But it is automatically pulled in if you enable INTEL_PMT_TELEMETRY:
> 
> drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/Kconfig-config INTEL_PMT_TELEMETRY
> drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/Kconfig- tristate "Intel Platform Monitoring Technology (PMT) Telemetry driver"
> drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/Kconfig- depends on INTEL_VSEC
> drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/Kconfig: select INTEL_PMT_DISCOVERY

The sentence reads:
"The INTEL_PMT_DISCOVERY driver provides intel_pmt_get_regions_by_feature()"

Looking at code:
intel_pmt_get_regions_by_feature() is implemented in:
	drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/telemetry.c

Looking at Makefile (drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/Makefile):
obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_PMT_TELEMETRY)	+= pmt_telemetry.o
pmt_telemetry-y				:= telemetry.o

Since intel_pmt_get_regions_by_feature() is in file associated with
INTEL_PMT_TELEMETRY I believe it is more accurate to say:

"The INTEL_PMT_TELEMETRY driver provides intel_pmt_get_regions_by_feature()"

I do not see INTEL_PMT_DISCOVERY depend on INTEL_PMT_TELEMETRY so
having a kernel built with just INTEL_PMT_DISCOVERY will not
include intel_pmt_get_regions_by_feature() so I do not believe 
"The INTEL_PMT_DISCOVERY driver provides intel_pmt_get_regions_by_feature()" 
is accurate.

Reinette