> > Apart from patch 6 to fix sashiko reported issues in pseudo-locking
> > everything looks good. I agree with Reinette's assessment[1] that
> > pursuing the bizarre corner case races for pseudo-locking should
> > not be a priority. That patch can be dropped.
>
> Thank you for taking a look.
>
> After thinking about patch 6 more I plan to drop the fixes surrounding the races
> but keep the fix for the RMID double-add. Since this will touch pseudo-locking region
> lifetime management I expect Sashiko would bring up the pseudo-locking races
> during its review but I believe this is a worthy fix.

Seems good.

> As a summary of your tags for this series I see:
> - patches 1, 2, 3, 4, and 9 have your Signed-off-by.
> - patches 5, 7, and 8 do not have any tags from you.

You can add my Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> to parts 5,7,8

-Tony

On 5/29/26 12:06 PM, Luck, Tony wrote:
>>> Apart from patch 6 to fix sashiko reported issues in pseudo-locking
>>> everything looks good. I agree with Reinette's assessment[1] that
>>> pursuing the bizarre corner case races for pseudo-locking should
>>> not be a priority. That patch can be dropped.
>>
>> Thank you for taking a look.
>>
>> After thinking about patch 6 more I plan to drop the fixes surrounding the races
>> but keep the fix for the RMID double-add. Since this will touch pseudo-locking region
>> lifetime management I expect Sashiko would bring up the pseudo-locking races
>> during its review but I believe this is a worthy fix.
> 
> Seems good.
> 
>> As a summary of your tags for this series I see:
>> - patches 1, 2, 3, 4, and 9 have your Signed-off-by.
>> - patches 5, 7, and 8 do not have any tags from you.
> 
> You can add my Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> to parts 5,7,8
> 

Thank you very much Tony.

Reinette