Hello Rodolfo,

> From: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@enneenne.com>
> Sent: Monday, July 15, 2024 2:37 AM

> Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/3] Add support for Intel PPS Generator
> 
> On 15/07/24 10:06, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 04 2024 at 13:50, Rodolfo Giometti wrote:
> >> On 03/07/24 16:47, D, Lakshmi Sowjanya wrote:
> >>>
> >>> A gentle reminder for the review of the pps patchset.
> >>
> >> I already acked these patchset, didn't I? =8-o
> >>
> >> Please let me know if I missed something.
> >
> > Sorry, I missed that V10 posting. It's too late now.
> >
> > Rodolfo, can you pick it up after rc1 for the next merge window. All
> > prerequisites should be in Linus tree then.
> 
> LinuxPPS has no dedicated tree as other Linux subsystems. Usually I send my
> "Acked" to Greg Kroah-Hartman and Andrew Morton, and they push patches
> by
> themselves.

Is the PPS driver on track to be included in the 6.11 release candidate?

Thanks,
Chris

On 24/07/24 23:39, Hall, Christopher S wrote:
> Hello Rodolfo,
> 
>> From: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@enneenne.com>
>> Sent: Monday, July 15, 2024 2:37 AM
> 
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/3] Add support for Intel PPS Generator
>>
>> On 15/07/24 10:06, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 04 2024 at 13:50, Rodolfo Giometti wrote:
>>>> On 03/07/24 16:47, D, Lakshmi Sowjanya wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> A gentle reminder for the review of the pps patchset.
>>>>
>>>> I already acked these patchset, didn't I? =8-o
>>>>
>>>> Please let me know if I missed something.
>>>
>>> Sorry, I missed that V10 posting. It's too late now.
>>>
>>> Rodolfo, can you pick it up after rc1 for the next merge window. All
>>> prerequisites should be in Linus tree then.
>>
>> LinuxPPS has no dedicated tree as other Linux subsystems. Usually I send my
>> "Acked" to Greg Kroah-Hartman and Andrew Morton, and they push patches
>> by
>> themselves.
> 
> Is the PPS driver on track to be included in the 6.11 release candidate?

I hope so! ^_^"

Unluckily the LinuxPPS is a minor subsystem with no dedicated tree, and 
inclusion is not under my control.

Ciao,

Rodolfo

-- 
GNU/Linux Solutions                  e-mail: giometti@enneenne.com
Linux Device Driver                          giometti@linux.it
Embedded Systems                     phone:  +39 349 2432127
UNIX programming

On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 09:05:02AM +0200, Rodolfo Giometti wrote:
> On 24/07/24 23:39, Hall, Christopher S wrote:
> > Hello Rodolfo,
> > 
> > > From: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@enneenne.com>
> > > Sent: Monday, July 15, 2024 2:37 AM
> > 
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/3] Add support for Intel PPS Generator
> > > 
> > > On 15/07/24 10:06, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jul 04 2024 at 13:50, Rodolfo Giometti wrote:
> > > > > On 03/07/24 16:47, D, Lakshmi Sowjanya wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > A gentle reminder for the review of the pps patchset.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I already acked these patchset, didn't I? =8-o
> > > > > 
> > > > > Please let me know if I missed something.
> > > > 
> > > > Sorry, I missed that V10 posting. It's too late now.
> > > > 
> > > > Rodolfo, can you pick it up after rc1 for the next merge window. All
> > > > prerequisites should be in Linus tree then.
> > > 
> > > LinuxPPS has no dedicated tree as other Linux subsystems. Usually I send my
> > > "Acked" to Greg Kroah-Hartman and Andrew Morton, and they push patches
> > > by
> > > themselves.
> > 
> > Is the PPS driver on track to be included in the 6.11 release candidate?
> 
> I hope so! ^_^"

Are the patches in linux-next?  If so, what tree did they go through?
If not, they can't be merged into 6.11-rc1.

> Unluckily the LinuxPPS is a minor subsystem with no dedicated tree, and
> inclusion is not under my control.

I pick up many "smaller" driver subsystems all the time, I just have to
be asked to do so...

thanks,

greg k-h

On Thu, Jul 25 2024 at 09:09, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> Are the patches in linux-next?  If so, what tree did they go through?
> If not, they can't be merged into 6.11-rc1.

Sorry, I missed that last submission.

It has dependencies on the timers/core branch which got merged into
mainline in the current merge window. So if someone could have picked it
up that would have been me.

It's unfortunately too late now, so this can be picked up for 6.12 by
anyone without dependencies.

Thanks,

        tglx