> -----Original Message-----
> From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2023 8:51 AM
> To: Leo Li <leoyang.li@nxp.com>
> Cc: Stuart Yoder <stuyoder@gmail.com>; Gaurav Jain
> <gaurav.jain@nxp.com>; Roy Pledge <roy.pledge@nxp.com>; Diana
> Madalina Craciun (OSS) <diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com>; Eric Dumazet
> <edumazet@google.com>; Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com>;
> kvm@vger.kernel.org; Horia Geanta <horia.geanta@nxp.com>; Jakub
> Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>; Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>; Laurentiu
> Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com>; Richard Cochran
> <richardcochran@gmail.com>; Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@nxp.com>; Alex
> Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>; linux-arm-
> kernel@lists.infradead.org; Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>;
> netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Vinod Koul
> <vkoul@kernel.org>; linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org; kernel@pengutronix.de;
> Y.B. Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>; dmaengine@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-
> dev@lists.ozlabs.org; David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] bus: fsl-mc: Make remove function return void
> 
> Hello,
> 
> On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 04:57:00PM -0500, Li Yang wrote:
> > On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 8:44 AM Uwe Kleine-König
> > <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 08:00:04AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 09:30:05PM +0000, Leo Li wrote:
> > > > > > On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 11:41:22PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > many bus remove functions return an integer which is a
> > > > > > > historic misdesign that makes driver authors assume that
> > > > > > > there is some kind of error handling in the upper layers.
> > > > > > > This is wrong however and returning and error code only yields an
> error message.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This series improves the fsl-mc bus by changing the remove
> > > > > > > callback to return no value instead. As a preparation all
> > > > > > > drivers are changed to return zero before so that they don't
> trigger the error message.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Who is supposed to pick up this patch series (or point out a
> > > > > > good reason for not taking it)?
> > > > >
> > > > > Previously Greg KH picked up MC bus patches.
> > > > >
> > > > > If no one is picking up them this time, I probably can take it
> > > > > through the fsl soc tree.
> > > >
> > > > I guess Greg won't pick up this series as he didn't get a copy of
> > > > it :-)
> > > >
> > > > Browsing through the history of drivers/bus/fsl-mc there is no
> > > > consistent maintainer to see. So if you can take it, that's very
> > > > appreciated.
> > >
> > > My mail was meant encouraging, maybe it was too subtile? I'll try again:
> > >
> > > Yes, please apply, that would be wonderful!
> >
> > Sorry for missing your previous email.  I will do that.  Thanks.
> 
> Either you didn't apply this patch set yet, or your tree isn't in next.
> Both variants would be great to be fixed.
> 
> I have another change pending for drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-bus.c, would be
> great to see these base patches in next first.

I have applied them to the next branch of my tree.  They will be part of the Linux-next soon.

Regards,
Leo