> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Hilber <peter.hilber@opensynergy.com>
> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2024 5:15 PM
> To: D, Lakshmi Sowjanya <lakshmi.sowjanya.d@intel.com>; Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: tglx@linutronix.de; jstultz@google.com; giometti@enneenne.com;
> corbet@lwn.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; x86@kernel.org;
> netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-doc@vger.kernel.org; intel-wired-
> lan@lists.osuosl.org; Dong, Eddie <eddie.dong@intel.com>; Hall, Christopher S
> <christopher.s.hall@intel.com>; Brandeburg, Jesse
> <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>; davem@davemloft.net;
> alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com; joabreu@synopsys.com;
> mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com; perex@perex.cz; linux-sound@vger.kernel.org;
> Nguyen, Anthony L <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>; N, Pandith
> <pandith.n@intel.com>; Sangannavar, Mallikarjunappa
> <mallikarjunappa.sangannavar@intel.com>; T R, Thejesh Reddy
> <thejesh.reddy.t.r@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 00/11] Add support for Intel PPS Generator
> 
> On 09.01.24 07:31, D, Lakshmi Sowjanya wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> >> Sent: Saturday, January 6, 2024 8:50 PM
> >> To: D, Lakshmi Sowjanya <lakshmi.sowjanya.d@intel.com>
> >> Cc: tglx@linutronix.de; jstultz@google.com; giometti@enneenne.com;
> >> corbet@lwn.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; x86@kernel.org;
> >> netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-doc@vger.kernel.org; intel-wired-
> >> lan@lists.osuosl.org; Dong, Eddie <eddie.dong@intel.com>; Hall,
> >> Christopher S <christopher.s.hall@intel.com>; Brandeburg, Jesse
> >> <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>; davem@davemloft.net;
> >> alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com; joabreu@synopsys.com;
> >> mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com; perex@perex.cz;
> >> linux-sound@vger.kernel.org; Nguyen, Anthony L
> >> <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>; N, Pandith <pandith.n@intel.com>;
> >> Sangannavar, Mallikarjunappa <mallikarjunappa.sangannavar@intel.com>;
> >> T R, Thejesh Reddy <thejesh.reddy.t.r@intel.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 00/11] Add support for Intel PPS Generator
> >>
> [...]
> >> At some point you should announce v1 of the series. RFC is usually
> >> being neglected by many (busy) maintainers.
> >
> > This patch series is dependent on
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20231215220612.173603-2-
> peter.hilber@opensynergy.com/T/ which is RFC.
> 
> So I understand my dependency series being RFC prevents the PPS series from
> dropping the RFC tag (correct me if I am wrong).
> 
> I plan to send out a non-RFC version of the dependency series next. So far I think
> there will only be polishing changes. Due to testing being some effort, I wanted
> to test and send it together with some other series.
> 
> But if this is blocking the PPS series, I think I could send out a non-RFC version of
> the dependency series earlier (by the end of January?). Please let me know what
> would align with the PPS series timeline.

Thanks Peter,
This timeline should be okay. We will also send non-RFC v1 by the same time.

Regards,
Sowjanya

> Regards,
> 
> Peter
> 
> >
> > Regards,
> > Sowjanya
> >>
> >> --
> >> With Best Regards,
> >> Andy Shevchenko
> >>
> >