Hi Krzysztof,

Apologies for both issues.

On 29/04/2026 10:14, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 29/04/2026 10:14, Avinash Bhatt wrote:
>> Link to RFC:
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/devicetree/patch/20260408055709.1
>> 1579-2-avinash.bhatt@intel.com/
>
> So that's a v2. Please version your patches correctly.

Acknowledged. RFC counts as v1 so the next revision should have been
[PATCH v2] — missed that convention. The next submission will be sent
as [PATCH v2] as it should be.

> Also, I don't understand how could you claim that RFC passes tests but
> this obviously was not tested.

I validated locally with dtschema 2025.12; the CI bot uses 2026.4
which added stricter enforcement of the items/minItems rule. We have
upgraded to 2026.4, fixed all errors, and all checks now pass clean.
Will send [PATCH v2] shortly.


Best regards,
Avinash

-----Original Message-----
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> 
Sent: 30 April 2026 13:21
To: Bhatt, Avinash <avinash.bhatt@intel.com>; devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; robh@kernel.org; krzk+dt@kernel.org; conor+dt@kernel.org; johannes@sipsolutions.net; Korenblit, Miriam Rachel <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>; Guetta, Kobi <kobi.guetta@intel.com>; Grumbach, Emmanuel <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] dt-bindings: net: wireless: intel,iwlwifi: add binding

On 29/04/2026 10:14, Avinash Bhatt wrote:
> Add Device Tree binding schema for Intel discrete Wi-Fi 7 BE200 PCIe 
> adapters. The binding documents optional OEM platform configuration 
> properties for platforms using Device Tree instead of ACPI/UEFI 
> firmware methods.
> 
> Link to RFC: 
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/devicetree/patch/20260408055709.1
> 1579-2-avinash.bhatt@intel.com/

So that's a v2. Please version your patches correctly.

Also, I don't understand how could you claim that RFC passes tests but this obviously was not tested.

Best regards,
Krzysztof