kernel/sched/core.c | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
When an uninterrptable task is queue to a differect cpu as where
it is dequeued, the rq nr_uninterruptible will be incorrent, so
fix it.
Signed-off-by: GuoYong Zheng <zhenggy@chinatelecom.cn>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 25b582b..cd5ef6e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -4068,6 +4068,7 @@ bool ttwu_state_match(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int *success)
{
unsigned long flags;
int cpu, success = 0;
+ struct rq *src_rq, *dst_rq;
preempt_disable();
if (p == current) {
@@ -4205,6 +4206,16 @@ bool ttwu_state_match(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int *success)
atomic_dec(&task_rq(p)->nr_iowait);
}
+ if (p->sched_contributes_to_load) {
+ src_rq = cpu_rq(task_cpu(p));
+ dst_rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
+
+ double_rq_lock(src_rq, dst_rq);
+ src_rq->nr_uninterruptible--;
+ dst_rq->nr_uninterruptible++;
+ double_rq_unlock(src_rq, dst_rq);
+ }
+
wake_flags |= WF_MIGRATED;
psi_ttwu_dequeue(p);
set_task_cpu(p, cpu);
--
1.8.3.1
On Tue, 2023-02-28 at 15:08 +0800, zhenggy wrote: > When an uninterrptable task is queue to a differect cpu as where > it is dequeued, the rq nr_uninterruptible will be incorrent, so > fix it. That's intentional, see 47-52 of kernel/sched/loadavg.c. -Mike
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 03:08:58PM +0800, zhenggy wrote: > When an uninterrptable task is queue to a differect cpu as where > it is dequeued, the rq nr_uninterruptible will be incorrent, so > fix it. tl;dr (too much typos above). Would you like to "massage" the commit mesage? > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c > index 25b582b..cd5ef6e 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c > @@ -4068,6 +4068,7 @@ bool ttwu_state_match(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int *success) > { > unsigned long flags; > int cpu, success = 0; > + struct rq *src_rq, *dst_rq; > > preempt_disable(); > if (p == current) { > @@ -4205,6 +4206,16 @@ bool ttwu_state_match(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int *success) > atomic_dec(&task_rq(p)->nr_iowait); > } > > + if (p->sched_contributes_to_load) { > + src_rq = cpu_rq(task_cpu(p)); > + dst_rq = cpu_rq(cpu); > + > + double_rq_lock(src_rq, dst_rq); > + src_rq->nr_uninterruptible--; > + dst_rq->nr_uninterruptible++; > + double_rq_unlock(src_rq, dst_rq); > + } > + Can you explain what the code above does to fix the problem you mentioned above? Thanks. -- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
On 2/28/23 02:08, zhenggy wrote: > When an uninterrptable task is queue to a differect cpu as where > it is dequeued, the rq nr_uninterruptible will be incorrent, so > fix it. > > Signed-off-by: GuoYong Zheng <zhenggy@chinatelecom.cn> > --- > kernel/sched/core.c | 11 +++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c > index 25b582b..cd5ef6e 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c > @@ -4068,6 +4068,7 @@ bool ttwu_state_match(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int *success) > { > unsigned long flags; > int cpu, success = 0; > + struct rq *src_rq, *dst_rq; > > preempt_disable(); > if (p == current) { > @@ -4205,6 +4206,16 @@ bool ttwu_state_match(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int *success) > atomic_dec(&task_rq(p)->nr_iowait); > } > > + if (p->sched_contributes_to_load) { > + src_rq = cpu_rq(task_cpu(p)); > + dst_rq = cpu_rq(cpu); > + > + double_rq_lock(src_rq, dst_rq); > + src_rq->nr_uninterruptible--; > + dst_rq->nr_uninterruptible++; > + double_rq_unlock(src_rq, dst_rq); > + } > + > wake_flags |= WF_MIGRATED; > psi_ttwu_dequeue(p); > set_task_cpu(p, cpu); This is Slade's kernel patch bot. When scanning his mailbox, I came across this message, which appears to have an odd format for its text ("text/plain; charset=gbk"). Emailed patches should be in ASCII or UTF-8 encoding. If you're using an email client, make sure it's configured to use either of the two formats. You can learn more in the kernel's documentation here: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/email-clients.html If you believe this is an error, please address a message to Slade Watkins <srw@sladewatkins.net>. Thank you, -- Slade's kernel patch bot
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.