drivers/phy/ingenic/phy-ingenic-usb.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
if ingenic_usb_phy_exit is called the regulator is already disabled
through ingenic_usb_phy_power_off() leading to
[ 5.367301] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 20 at drivers/regulator/core.c:2953 _regulator_disable+0x200/0x230
[ 5.368209] unbalanced disables for regulator-dummy
[ 5.370364] Modules linked in: phy_ingenic_usb
...
[ 5.373441] [<8054601c>] regulator_disable+0x40/0x80
[ 5.372952] [<c02450f8>] ingenic_usb_phy_exit+0x48/0x60 [phy_ingenic_usb]
[ 5.374283] [<8050839c>] phy_exit+0xd8/0x104
[ 5.373104] [<80657a24>] __dwc2_lowlevel_hw_disable+0xe0/0xe8
[ 5.373393] [<80658ad4>] dwc2_driver_probe+0x818/0x834
...
Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@goldelico.com>
---
Notes:
Resent because linux-mips@vger.kernel.org was not automatically added by
get_maintainer.pl (drivers/phy/ingenic missing in MAINTAINERS record?)
drivers/phy/ingenic/phy-ingenic-usb.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/phy/ingenic/phy-ingenic-usb.c b/drivers/phy/ingenic/phy-ingenic-usb.c
index eb2721f72a4c1..35984dd8a1bd7 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/ingenic/phy-ingenic-usb.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/ingenic/phy-ingenic-usb.c
@@ -124,7 +124,6 @@ static int ingenic_usb_phy_exit(struct phy *phy)
struct ingenic_usb_phy *priv = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
clk_disable_unprepare(priv->clk);
- regulator_disable(priv->vcc_supply);
return 0;
}
--
2.47.0
Hi Nikolaus, Le dimanche 29 décembre 2024 à 15:22 +0100, H. Nikolaus Schaller a écrit : > if ingenic_usb_phy_exit is called the regulator is already disabled > through ingenic_usb_phy_power_off() leading to > > [ 5.367301] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 20 at > drivers/regulator/core.c:2953 _regulator_disable+0x200/0x230 > [ 5.368209] unbalanced disables for regulator-dummy > [ 5.370364] Modules linked in: phy_ingenic_usb > ... > [ 5.373441] [<8054601c>] regulator_disable+0x40/0x80 > [ 5.372952] [<c02450f8>] ingenic_usb_phy_exit+0x48/0x60 > [phy_ingenic_usb] > [ 5.374283] [<8050839c>] phy_exit+0xd8/0x104 > [ 5.373104] [<80657a24>] __dwc2_lowlevel_hw_disable+0xe0/0xe8 > [ 5.373393] [<80658ad4>] dwc2_driver_probe+0x818/0x834 > ... > > Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@goldelico.com> Looks good to me. The regulator is not enabled in ingenic_usb_phy_init(), so it should not be disabled in ingenic_usb_phy_exit(). Reviewed-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net> Cheers, -Paul > --- > > Notes: > Resent because linux-mips@vger.kernel.org was not automatically > added by > get_maintainer.pl (drivers/phy/ingenic missing in MAINTAINERS > record?) > > drivers/phy/ingenic/phy-ingenic-usb.c | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/phy/ingenic/phy-ingenic-usb.c > b/drivers/phy/ingenic/phy-ingenic-usb.c > index eb2721f72a4c1..35984dd8a1bd7 100644 > --- a/drivers/phy/ingenic/phy-ingenic-usb.c > +++ b/drivers/phy/ingenic/phy-ingenic-usb.c > @@ -124,7 +124,6 @@ static int ingenic_usb_phy_exit(struct phy *phy) > struct ingenic_usb_phy *priv = phy_get_drvdata(phy); > > clk_disable_unprepare(priv->clk); > - regulator_disable(priv->vcc_supply); > > return 0; > }
Hi, I just wonder if anyone is picking this up? There seems to be no MAINTAINER specific for drivers/phy/ingenic. BR, Nikolaus > Am 02.01.2025 um 13:53 schrieb Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>: > > Hi Nikolaus, > > Le dimanche 29 décembre 2024 à 15:22 +0100, H. Nikolaus Schaller a > écrit : >> if ingenic_usb_phy_exit is called the regulator is already disabled >> through ingenic_usb_phy_power_off() leading to >> >> [ 5.367301] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 20 at >> drivers/regulator/core.c:2953 _regulator_disable+0x200/0x230 >> [ 5.368209] unbalanced disables for regulator-dummy >> [ 5.370364] Modules linked in: phy_ingenic_usb >> ... >> [ 5.373441] [<8054601c>] regulator_disable+0x40/0x80 >> [ 5.372952] [<c02450f8>] ingenic_usb_phy_exit+0x48/0x60 >> [phy_ingenic_usb] >> [ 5.374283] [<8050839c>] phy_exit+0xd8/0x104 >> [ 5.373104] [<80657a24>] __dwc2_lowlevel_hw_disable+0xe0/0xe8 >> [ 5.373393] [<80658ad4>] dwc2_driver_probe+0x818/0x834 >> ... >> >> Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@goldelico.com> > > Looks good to me. The regulator is not enabled in > ingenic_usb_phy_init(), so it should not be disabled in > ingenic_usb_phy_exit(). > > Reviewed-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net> > > Cheers, > -Paul > > >> --- >> >> Notes: >> Resent because linux-mips@vger.kernel.org was not automatically >> added by >> get_maintainer.pl (drivers/phy/ingenic missing in MAINTAINERS >> record?) >> >> drivers/phy/ingenic/phy-ingenic-usb.c | 1 - >> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/phy/ingenic/phy-ingenic-usb.c >> b/drivers/phy/ingenic/phy-ingenic-usb.c >> index eb2721f72a4c1..35984dd8a1bd7 100644 >> --- a/drivers/phy/ingenic/phy-ingenic-usb.c >> +++ b/drivers/phy/ingenic/phy-ingenic-usb.c >> @@ -124,7 +124,6 @@ static int ingenic_usb_phy_exit(struct phy *phy) >> struct ingenic_usb_phy *priv = phy_get_drvdata(phy); >> >> clk_disable_unprepare(priv->clk); >> - regulator_disable(priv->vcc_supply); >> >> return 0; >> }
Vinod, can you take this? Cheers, -Paul Le mercredi 26 février 2025 à 21:54 +0100, H. Nikolaus Schaller a écrit : > Hi, > > I just wonder if anyone is picking this up? > > There seems to be no MAINTAINER specific for drivers/phy/ingenic. > > BR, > Nikolaus > > > Am 02.01.2025 um 13:53 schrieb Paul Cercueil > > <paul@crapouillou.net>: > > > > Hi Nikolaus, > > > > Le dimanche 29 décembre 2024 à 15:22 +0100, H. Nikolaus Schaller a > > écrit : > > > if ingenic_usb_phy_exit is called the regulator is already > > > disabled > > > through ingenic_usb_phy_power_off() leading to > > > > > > [ 5.367301] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 20 at > > > drivers/regulator/core.c:2953 _regulator_disable+0x200/0x230 > > > [ 5.368209] unbalanced disables for regulator-dummy > > > [ 5.370364] Modules linked in: phy_ingenic_usb > > > ... > > > [ 5.373441] [<8054601c>] regulator_disable+0x40/0x80 > > > [ 5.372952] [<c02450f8>] ingenic_usb_phy_exit+0x48/0x60 > > > [phy_ingenic_usb] > > > [ 5.374283] [<8050839c>] phy_exit+0xd8/0x104 > > > [ 5.373104] [<80657a24>] __dwc2_lowlevel_hw_disable+0xe0/0xe8 > > > [ 5.373393] [<80658ad4>] dwc2_driver_probe+0x818/0x834 > > > ... > > > > > > Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@goldelico.com> > > > > Looks good to me. The regulator is not enabled in > > ingenic_usb_phy_init(), so it should not be disabled in > > ingenic_usb_phy_exit(). > > > > Reviewed-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net> > > > > Cheers, > > -Paul > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > Notes: > > > Resent because linux-mips@vger.kernel.org was not > > > automatically > > > added by > > > get_maintainer.pl (drivers/phy/ingenic missing in MAINTAINERS > > > record?) > > > > > > drivers/phy/ingenic/phy-ingenic-usb.c | 1 - > > > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/phy/ingenic/phy-ingenic-usb.c > > > b/drivers/phy/ingenic/phy-ingenic-usb.c > > > index eb2721f72a4c1..35984dd8a1bd7 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/phy/ingenic/phy-ingenic-usb.c > > > +++ b/drivers/phy/ingenic/phy-ingenic-usb.c > > > @@ -124,7 +124,6 @@ static int ingenic_usb_phy_exit(struct phy > > > *phy) > > > struct ingenic_usb_phy *priv = phy_get_drvdata(phy); > > > > > > clk_disable_unprepare(priv->clk); > > > - regulator_disable(priv->vcc_supply); > > > > > > return 0; > > > } > >
On 14-03-25, 11:33, Paul Cercueil wrote: > Vinod, can you take this? I dont seem to have this in my queue, can you pls post it again -- ~Vinod
Hi Vinod, > Am 16.03.2025 um 17:39 schrieb Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>: > > On 14-03-25, 11:33, Paul Cercueil wrote: >> Vinod, can you take this? > > I dont seem to have this in my queue, can you pls post it again > > -- > ~Vinod > Here it is: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-phy/patch/96da5fe557f3b2501447358895bd78decc4633ef.1735482146.git.hns@goldelico.com/ Strangely it wasn't collected by https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mips/list/ BR and thanks, Nikolaus
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.