[PATCH 0/2] selftests/damon: fix and validate memcg filter memcg_path handling

niecheng posted 2 patches 1 week, 4 days ago
Only 0 patches received!
tools/testing/selftests/damon/_damon_sysfs.py |  2 +-
tools/testing/selftests/damon/sysfs.py        | 13 +++++++++++--
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
[PATCH 0/2] selftests/damon: fix and validate memcg filter memcg_path handling
Posted by niecheng 1 week, 4 days ago
This series fixes memcg_path handling in DamosFilter and adds memcg
filter validation to the DAMON sysfs selftest.

The first patch fixes DamosFilter so memcg_path is stored as a string
for sysfs staging.  The second patch adds memcg filter validation by
checking the memcg_path sysfs readback.

niecheng (2):
  selftests/damon: fix DamosFilter memcg_path assignment
  selftests/damon: validate memcg filter sysfs readback

 tools/testing/selftests/damon/_damon_sysfs.py |  2 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/damon/sysfs.py        | 13 +++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

-- 
2.51.0
Re: [PATCH 0/2] selftests/damon: fix and validate memcg filter memcg_path handling
Posted by SeongJae Park 1 week, 4 days ago
Somehow the mails of this series don't have correct 'in-reply-to' field, and
therefore not constructed as a single thread but three individual threads.
Please check your setup for next time.

On Thu, 28 May 2026 16:10:37 +0800 niecheng <niecheng1@uniontech.com> wrote:

> This series fixes memcg_path handling in DamosFilter and adds memcg
> filter validation to the DAMON sysfs selftest.
> 
> The first patch fixes DamosFilter so memcg_path is stored as a string
> for sysfs staging.  The second patch adds memcg filter validation by
> checking the memcg_path sysfs readback.

Nice catches and improvements, thank you!

I left a few comments on individual pattches, though.


Thanks,
SJ

[...]
Re: [PATCH 0/2] selftests/damon: fix and validate memcg filter memcg_path handling
Posted by niecheng 1 week, 3 days ago
On Thu, 28 May 2026 07:32:03 -0700 SeongJae Park wrote:

> Somehow the mails of this series don't have correct 'in-reply-to' field,
> and therefore not constructed as a single thread but three individual
> threads.  Please check your setup for next time.

Sorry about that.  I will be more careful when sending patches going
forward.

> Nice catches and improvements, thank you!
>
> I left a few comments on individual pattches, though.

Thank you!  I will address the comments on the individual patches and
send a v2 soon.

Thanks,
Cheng Nie