arch/powerpc/kernel/switch.S | 1 - arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S | 2 -- 2 files changed, 3 deletions(-)
The following build warning have been reported:
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.o: warning: objtool: .text+0xe84: intra_function_call not a direct call
arch/powerpc/kernel/switch.o: warning: objtool: .text+0x4: intra_function_call not a direct call
This happens due to commit bb7f054f4de2 ("objtool/powerpc: Add support
for decoding all types of uncond branches") because that commit decodes
'bl .+4' as a normal instruction because that instruction is used by
clang instead of 'bcl 20,31,+.4' for relocatable code.
The solution is simply to remove the ANNOTATE_INTRA_FUNCTION_CALL
annotation now that the instruction is not seen as a function call
anymore.
Reported-by: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/8c4c3fc2-2bd7-4148-af68-2f504d6119e0@linux.ibm.com
Fixes: bb7f054f4de2 ("objtool/powerpc: Add support for decoding all types of uncond branches")
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/switch.S | 1 -
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S | 2 --
2 files changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/switch.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/switch.S
index 608c0ce7cec6..59e3ee99db0e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/switch.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/switch.S
@@ -39,7 +39,6 @@ flush_branch_caches:
// Flush the link stack
.rept 64
- ANNOTATE_INTRA_FUNCTION_CALL
bl .+4
.endr
b 1f
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
index ea7ad200b330..83f7504349d2 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
@@ -1524,14 +1524,12 @@ kvm_flush_link_stack:
/* Flush the link stack. On Power8 it's up to 32 entries in size. */
.rept 32
- ANNOTATE_INTRA_FUNCTION_CALL
bl .+4
.endr
/* And on Power9 it's up to 64. */
BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
.rept 32
- ANNOTATE_INTRA_FUNCTION_CALL
bl .+4
.endr
END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300)
--
2.47.0
On Wed, 05 Mar 2025 00:00:19 +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> The following build warning have been reported:
>
> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.o: warning: objtool: .text+0xe84: intra_function_call not a direct call
> arch/powerpc/kernel/switch.o: warning: objtool: .text+0x4: intra_function_call not a direct call
>
> This happens due to commit bb7f054f4de2 ("objtool/powerpc: Add support
> for decoding all types of uncond branches") because that commit decodes
> 'bl .+4' as a normal instruction because that instruction is used by
> clang instead of 'bcl 20,31,+.4' for relocatable code.
>
> [...]
Applied to powerpc/next.
[1/1] powerpc: Fix 'intra_function_call not a direct call' warning
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/382094a41c706bf9d990a224d5d4d34c02a21f15
Thanks
Hello Christophe,
On 05/03/25 4:30 am, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> The following build warning have been reported:
>
> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.o: warning: objtool: .text+0xe84: intra_function_call not a direct call
> arch/powerpc/kernel/switch.o: warning: objtool: .text+0x4: intra_function_call not a direct call
>
> This happens due to commit bb7f054f4de2 ("objtool/powerpc: Add support
> for decoding all types of uncond branches") because that commit decodes
> 'bl .+4' as a normal instruction because that instruction is used by
> clang instead of 'bcl 20,31,+.4' for relocatable code.
>
> The solution is simply to remove the ANNOTATE_INTRA_FUNCTION_CALL
> annotation now that the instruction is not seen as a function call
> anymore.
>
> Reported-by: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/8c4c3fc2-2bd7-4148-af68-2f504d6119e0@linux.ibm.com
> Fixes: bb7f054f4de2 ("objtool/powerpc: Add support for decoding all types of uncond branches")
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/switch.S | 1 -
> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S | 2 --
> 2 files changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/switch.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/switch.S
> index 608c0ce7cec6..59e3ee99db0e 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/switch.S
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/switch.S
> @@ -39,7 +39,6 @@ flush_branch_caches:
>
> // Flush the link stack
> .rept 64
> - ANNOTATE_INTRA_FUNCTION_CALL
> bl .+4
> .endr
> b 1f
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
> index ea7ad200b330..83f7504349d2 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
> @@ -1524,14 +1524,12 @@ kvm_flush_link_stack:
>
> /* Flush the link stack. On Power8 it's up to 32 entries in size. */
> .rept 32
> - ANNOTATE_INTRA_FUNCTION_CALL
> bl .+4
> .endr
>
> /* And on Power9 it's up to 64. */
> BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
> .rept 32
> - ANNOTATE_INTRA_FUNCTION_CALL
> bl .+4
> .endr
> END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300)
Applied this patch on top of linux-next 20250303, and it fixes the below
reported warning.
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.o: warning: objtool: .text+0xe84: intra_function_call not a direct call
arch/powerpc/kernel/switch.o: warning: objtool: .text+0x4: intra_function_call not a direct call
Please add below tag:
Tested-By: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>
Regards,
Venkat.
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.