From DT point of view, in general, drivers should be asking for a
specific port number because their function is fixed in the binding.

of_graph_get_next_endpoint() doesn't match to this concept.

Simply replace

        - of_graph_get_next_endpoint(xxx, NULL);
        + of_graph_get_endpoint_by_regs(xxx, 0, -1);

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-raspberrypi-touchscreen.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-raspberrypi-touchscreen.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-raspberrypi-touchscreen.c
index 4618c892cdd65..e10e469aa7a6c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-raspberrypi-touchscreen.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-raspberrypi-touchscreen.c
@@ -400,7 +400,7 @@ static int rpi_touchscreen_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c)
 	rpi_touchscreen_i2c_write(ts, REG_POWERON, 0);
 
 	/* Look up the DSI host.  It needs to probe before we do. */
-	endpoint = of_graph_get_next_endpoint(dev->of_node, NULL);
+	endpoint = of_graph_get_endpoint_by_regs(dev->of_node, 0, -1);
 	if (!endpoint)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
-- 
2.43.0