On Fri, 20 Sep 2024, WangYuli wrote:
> There is a spelling mistake of 'ACCCESS_LOCAL' which should be
> instead of 'ACCESS_LOCAL'.
"instead of ACCESS_LOCAL" means opposite of what you intended. I'd just
drop "instead of".
> Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
> Signed-off-by: WangYuli <wangyuli@uniontech.com>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c
> index c04bb7f97a4d..7680474c4f96 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c
> @@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ static int intel_pmt_populate_entry(struct intel_pmt_entry *entry,
> /*
> * Some hardware use a different calculation for the base address
> * when access_type == ACCESS_LOCAL. On the these systems
> - * ACCCESS_LOCAL refers to an address in the same BAR as the
> + * ACCESS_LOCAL refers to an address in the same BAR as the
The change is fine.
--
i.