This patch was initially written for the Linux Kernel Bug Fixing Mentorship
program. The patch adds a temporarily stubbed section on Acceleration Nodes
to resolve a documentation warning.

This resolves the warning:
./Documentation/gpu/drm-internals:179: ./include/drm/drm_file.h:411: WARNING: undefined label: drm_accel_node

I would appreciate any feedback on what should be documented here.

Signed-off-by: Dylan Le <self@dylanle.dev>
---
 Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst b/Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst
index ce47b4292..d25539862 100644
--- a/Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst
+++ b/Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst
@@ -175,6 +175,15 @@ other hand, a driver requires shared state between clients which is
 visible to user-space and accessible beyond open-file boundaries, they
 cannot support render nodes.
 
+.. _drm_accel_node:
+
+Acceleration nodes
+==================
+
+.. note::
+   There is not any documentation yet need to figure out what this is.
+
+
 Device Hot-Unplug
 =================
 
-- 
2.30.2

On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 02:52:52AM +0000, Dylan Le wrote:
> 
> This patch was initially written for the Linux Kernel Bug Fixing Mentorship
> program. The patch adds a temporarily stubbed section on Acceleration Nodes
> to resolve a documentation warning.
> 
> This resolves the warning:
> ./Documentation/gpu/drm-internals:179: ./include/drm/drm_file.h:411: WARNING: undefined label: drm_accel_node

Please write the patch description in imperative mood ("Do foo" instead
of "This patch does foo").

> 
> I would appreciate any feedback on what should be documented here.

I think above is better placed between the three dashes and diffstat ...


> ---

like here.

>  Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 

> +.. _drm_accel_node:
> +
> +Acceleration nodes
> +==================
> +
> +.. note::
> +   There is not any documentation yet need to figure out what this is.

I'd like to write this stub as generic .. admonition:: block [1] instead,
with the content which is "This section is empty, add appropriate
documentation here." or similar.

[1]: https://docutils.sourceforge.io/docs/ref/rst/directives.html#generic-admonition

Thanks. 

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

On Wednesday, February 22nd, 2023 at 11:25 PM, Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 02:52:52AM +0000, Dylan Le wrote:
> 
> > This patch was initially written for the Linux Kernel Bug Fixing Mentorship
> > program. The patch adds a temporarily stubbed section on Acceleration Nodes
> > to resolve a documentation warning.
> > 
> > This resolves the warning:
> > ./Documentation/gpu/drm-internals:179: ./include/drm/drm_file.h:411: WARNING: undefined label: drm_accel_node
> 
> 
> Please write the patch description in imperative mood ("Do foo" instead
> of "This patch does foo").
> 
> > I would appreciate any feedback on what should be documented here.
> 
> 
> I think above is better placed between the three dashes and diffstat ...
> 
> > ---
> 
> 
> like here.
> 
> > Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst | 9 +++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> > +.. _drm_accel_node:
> > +
> > +Acceleration nodes
> > +==================
> > +
> > +.. note::
> > + There is not any documentation yet need to figure out what this is.
> 
> 
> I'd like to write this stub as generic .. admonition:: block [1] instead,
> with the content which is "This section is empty, add appropriate
> documentation here." or similar.
> 
> [1]: https://docutils.sourceforge.io/docs/ref/rst/directives.html#generic-admonition
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> --
> An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

Thank you Bagas for the feedback,

I prematurely sent a v2 of this patch taking into account your feedback, but I will hold off on other changes. Since there seems to be another discussion about a broken reference in drm_file.h.

If there is something I can look at in the meantime let me know.

Thanks,
Dylan Le

I'm thinking the drm_file.h reference is broken.  I suspect it should
reference Documentation/accel/index.rst

Oded?

On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 9:25 PM Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 02:52:52AM +0000, Dylan Le wrote:
> >
> > This patch was initially written for the Linux Kernel Bug Fixing Mentorship
> > program. The patch adds a temporarily stubbed section on Acceleration Nodes
> > to resolve a documentation warning.
> >
> > This resolves the warning:
> > ./Documentation/gpu/drm-internals:179: ./include/drm/drm_file.h:411: WARNING: undefined label: drm_accel_node
>
> Please write the patch description in imperative mood ("Do foo" instead
> of "This patch does foo").
>
> >
> > I would appreciate any feedback on what should be documented here.
>
> I think above is better placed between the three dashes and diffstat ...
>
>
> > ---
>
> like here.
>
> >  Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst | 9 +++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >
>
> > +.. _drm_accel_node:
> > +
> > +Acceleration nodes
> > +==================
> > +
> > +.. note::
> > +   There is not any documentation yet need to figure out what this is.
>
> I'd like to write this stub as generic .. admonition:: block [1] instead,
> with the content which is "This section is empty, add appropriate
> documentation here." or similar.
>
> [1]: https://docutils.sourceforge.io/docs/ref/rst/directives.html#generic-admonition
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

On 2/27/23 23:43, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> I'm thinking the drm_file.h reference is broken.  I suspect it should
> reference Documentation/accel/index.rst
> 

I think so, but since the doc tree above only contains "Introduction"
doc, the reference should be that doc, right?

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara